On 07/23/2013 01:03 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I like the idea of a veto but only if it's used for when a particular language has had it's
translations broken or corrupted in some way. Obviously the example of French was a
bit daft because the French translation is always excellent.
2013/7/23 Krunoslav Šebetić kruno0...@gmail.com
On 07/23/2013 01:03 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I like the idea of a veto but only if it's used for when a particular
language has had it's translations broken or corrupted in some way.
Obviously the example of French was a bit daft because
On 07/23/2013 01:53 PM, Krunoslav Šebetić wrote:
On 07/23/2013 01:45 PM, Sérgio Marques wrote:
2013/7/23 Krunoslav Šebetić kruno0...@gmail.com
mailto:kruno0...@gmail.com
On 07/23/2013 01:03 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I like the idea of a veto but only if it's used for
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Krunoslav Šebetić kruno0...@gmail.com wrote:
We also have problem with that - it's only our fault...
I disagree: why is it our fault? Shouldn't LibreOffice handle styles
in a translation-agnostic way in the first place?
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
2013/7/23 Krunoslav Šebetić kruno0...@gmail.com
On 07/23/2013 01:45 PM, Sérgio Marques wrote:
I'm fallowing this list for a few years but wasn't active till now, and
I'm not sure how it merged but bug is there.
Also:
If the only problem is same translation for Heading and Title my
I have a solution.
PO files do have a comment field.
This was unused before because the actual strings resided in sdf files
and po files were just a derivative of sdf files. But now PO and POT
files are the true base.
So I guess it is job of authors of strings and documentation team to
write to
2013/7/23 Martin Srebotnjak mi...@filmsi.net
I have a solution.
PO files do have a comment field.
This was unused before because the actual strings resided in sdf files
and po files were just a derivative of sdf files. But now PO and POT
files are the true base.
So I guess it is job of
Hi Sérgio, *,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Sérgio Marques smarque...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/7/23 Martin Srebotnjak mi...@filmsi.net
Why was there no announcement when getting the changes from pootle?
→ because there was no check that triggered a warning. Also there was
no merge-conflict, as
Would such comment be a solution, really?
For one, PO fileset is local. Work put there is
being constantly lost, if slowly.
Now, is there a POT fileset serving as the root
source of English strings?
Is one Andras publishes such root source?
Or is there one more root-ish than that?
-Yury
Le 23/07/2013 17:39, Yury Tarasievich a écrit :
Would such comment be a solution, really?
I don't know, we find the bug because we use the same set of docs during
the tests of FR versions. Then we narrow that the EN version was ok and
the bug appears between beta1 and beta2 and was present
On 07/23/2013 06:48 PM, Sophie wrote:
...
Now, is there a POT fileset serving as the
root source of English strings?
Is one Andras publishes such root source?
Or is there one more root-ish than that?
The latest pot file is published here by Andras
2013/7/23 Yury Tarasievich yury.tarasiev...@gmail.com:
Would such comment be a solution, really?
For one, PO fileset is local. Work put there is being constantly lost, if
slowly.
Now, is there a POT fileset serving as the root source of English strings?
Is one Andras publishes such root
On 07/23/2013 07:23 PM, Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
SDF is deprecated - POT files are generated directly from code, and PO
files are directly checked back into code.
So where would the comment come from after the
re-generation?
-Yury
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
2013/7/23 Yury Tarasievich yury.tarasiev...@gmail.com:
So where would the comment come from after the re-generation?
I have written that already in another mail - from the code, from the
same place where the string comes. There should be some refactoring of
the toolkit to get pot files
So effectively such placing of the comments is a
thing of future, relying on several changes in
the technological process (comments proper +
toolkit refactored)?
I was more interested in what might be done in
that matter sort of now and read your message
from a wrong perspective.
-Yury
2013/7/23 Yury Tarasievich yury.tarasiev...@gmail.com:
So effectively such placing of the comments is a thing of future, relying on
several changes in the technological process (comments proper + toolkit
refactored)?
I was more interested in what might be done in that matter sort of now and
16 matches
Mail list logo
