Re: [libreoffice-l10n] About Calc function FORECAST_ETS_ADD

2016-05-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi, Le 09/05/2016 09:51, winfrieddonk...@libreoffice.org a écrit : > Hi hihgly-respected translaters, > > I think I used consistent instead of constant because the interval may > be in months, which numerically is not constant (with months having > different lengths). Indeed, but only if the

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] About Calc function FORECAST_ETS_ADD

2016-05-09 Thread winfrieddonkers
Hi hihgly-respected translaters, I think I used consistent instead of constant because the interval may be in months, which numerically is not constant (with months having different lengths). And I wasn't consistent in my choice of words... Probably, 'constant' will be clearer to the user

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] About Calc function FORECAST_ETS_ADD

2016-05-08 Thread Olivier Hallot
Hello Jean Baptiste The source of this information states "consistent" (bug 97021) but I agree that mathematicaly, "consistent" does not mean much and the context call for "constant" instead. Poking Winfried... Kind regards Olivier Em 08/05/2016 07:57, Jean-Baptiste Faure escreveu: > Hi, > >

[libreoffice-l10n] About Calc function FORECAST_ETS_ADD

2016-05-08 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi, Trying to translate UI for FORECAST_ETS_ADD function, I read its online help to understand what this function does. In the help we have "The time line values must have a consistent step between them." and "If a constant step can't be identified in the sorted time line, the functions will