Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Another invalid xml tag

Hi Valter, *, On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Valter Mura wrote: >> […] >> Empty caseinline statements doesn't make sense at all, writing it in >> expanded form doesn't change the meaning. It then would still be >> pointless. >> >> In this case the whole switchinline

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Another invalid xml tag

Il 02/08/2016 12:18, Christian Lohmaier ha scritto: On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Le 31/07/2016 à 15:57, Martin Srebotnjak a écrit : 2016-07-31 12:28 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Faure

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Another invalid xml tag

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > Le 31/07/2016 à 15:57, Martin Srebotnjak a écrit : >> 2016-07-31 12:28 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Faure > >: > >> no, that tag is self-closed, just as

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Another invalid xml tag

Le 31/07/2016 à 15:57, Martin Srebotnjak a écrit : > Hi, > no, that tag is self-closed, just as (for line break) in HTML, > that is why there is that / at the end of tag and it does not need > another tag for closing. In that case, there is a bug in Pootle which detects these self-closing tags

[libreoffice-l10n] Another invalid xml tag

Hi, According to Pootle, in the string buNWf in https://translations.documentfoundation.org/fr/libo_help/translate/sdraw.po#unit=29707700 there is an invalid xml tag. I guess it is Shouldn't it be changed in ? Best regards. JBF -- Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos