Hi,
I dont remember this. Was it done for sl and sr as well? Probably I forgot
...
Lp, m.
19. dec. 2016 12.21 je oseba "Christian Lohmaier"
napisala:
> HI Martin, *,
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Martin Srebotnjak
> wrote:
> >
> > I do not
Hi *,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:51 PM, khagaroth wrote:
>> it seems the goal is to move away from .xhp to .xhtml
>>
> I hope you meant HTML 5, because XHTML is a dead end (and good riddance).
What will be in the installation set of course is independent of what
is used as
Hi Jan, *,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Jan Iversen píše v Pá 16. 12. 2016 v 16:27 +0100:
>
>> > this change is supposed to be transparent for L10n and
>> > Documentation teams, but they should know :-)
>>
>> It does not seem transparent for the
Hi, Jan,
2016-12-16 17:38 GMT+01:00 Jan Holesovsky :
> > It does not seem transparent for the few languages that do not use
> pootle (sl and sr) please do not forget those.
>
> Thanks for the reminder. I hope Cloph can do the upgrade for them some
> way that fits them too,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:51:41PM +0100, khagaroth wrote:
> > there are many ways how to describe the same thing in html ('s and 's
> > vs. and vs. 's with css vs. who-knows-what)
>
> CSS is the preferred way, its the same as with styles and direct formatting
> in Writer.
CSS is preferred for
>
> it seems the goal is to move away from .xhp to .xhtml
>
> I hope you meant HTML 5, because XHTML is a dead end (and good riddance).
html does not have markup for some of the semantics that we have (and need)
> in the help files (like or to name few)
>
Both and are part of HTML 5 and
Hi Jan,
Jan Iversen píše v Pá 16. 12. 2016 v 16:27 +0100:
> > this change is supposed to be transparent for L10n and
> > Documentation teams, but they should know :-)
>
> It does not seem transparent for the few languages that do not use pootle (sl
> and sr) please do not forget those.
Thanks