America’s Upside-Down Morality: Bradley Manning Apologizes for Doing the
Right Thing


By Robert Parry <http://www.globalresearch.ca/author/robert-parry> 

Global Research, August 15, 2013

Consortiumnews <http://consortiumnews.com/> 

 private manning
<http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/private-manning-400
x346.jpg> 

Pvt. Bradley Manning has prostrated himself before his court-martial judge,
apologizing for leaking documents on U.S. government wrongdoing and
referencing his psychological problems as reasons for mercy. The sad
spectacle underscores how upside-down American morality now is.

Having covered the U.S. government for nearly 36 years, I am not so naïve as
to expect perfection or even anything close. But there are times when the
immoral dimensions of Official Washington stand out in the starkest shades,
not in variations of gray but in black and white.

Such was the gut-wrenching moment on Wednesday when Pvt. Bradley Manning,
who exposed U.S. government war crimes and other wrongdoing, made a
groveling apology for doing the right thing – when there has been next to no
accountability for the officials and their media collaborators who did
innumerable wrong things.

 <http://consortiumnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/collateralmurder.jpg>


Photo: A scene from the “Collateral Murder” video in which an Iraqi man
stops his van to aid those wounded in a lethal U.S. helicopter attack in
Baghdad on July 12, 2007, only to be killed by the American gunners.

While no one in power seems to expect even an apology from – let alone
punishment of – former President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney
and their subordinates who facilitated acts of torture and who deceived the
American people into an unprovoked invasion of Iraq, 25-year-old Bradley
Manning finds himself having to beg for mercy to avoid what could be a
90-year prison sentence.

At his court-martial sentencing hearing, Manning’s attorneys presented the
brave whistleblower as a psychologically confused young man who mistakenly
thought he was doing something good when he was really doing something bad.
They even released a photo of him dressed as a woman, setting the stage for
Manning’s apology.

“I’m sorry that my actions hurt people,” Manning told the court martial
judge. “I’m sorry that they hurt the United States. At the time of my
decision, as you know, I was dealing with a lot of issues, issues that are
ongoing and continue to affect me.”

But there has been no serious evidence that Manning’s disclosure of hundreds
of thousands of classified U.S. government records “hurt people” – and they
only “hurt the United States” in the sense that many of Official
Washington’s misdeeds and manipulations were exposed for the world to see.
Some of Manning’s critics say U.S. diplomats now won’t be so forthcoming in
describing these realities out of fear that some future Manning might do
more leaking, but there’s no evidence of that either.

In contrast to the lack of evidence regarding harm, there were undeniable
benefits to democracy and human rights from what Manning did reveal.
Manning’s documents provided the detailed “ground truth” that has enabled
Americans to better understand what their government did in Iraq and
Afghanistan – and how grotesque many of those crimes were.

For instance, because Manning disclosed a classified videotape, we know that
the much-heralded “successful surge” in Iraq in 2007 included the slaughter
of innocent Iraqis walking down the streets of Baghdad as well as the
slaying of a Good Samaritan who stopped his van, carrying his own children,
in a vain attempt to help the wounded. The trigger-happy helicopter gunners
killed the man and wounded his kids, too.

Manning’s leaks also revealed the U.S. government’s awareness of gross
corruption in “allied” countries, such as Tunisia where the revelations
helped spark an uprising that drove out a longtime dictator and gave
Tunisians a chance at democracy.

Iran’s Nuclear Program

Another important Manning disclosure, which may have deterred another
catastrophic war in the Middle East, was how the U.S. government had
manipulated the election of the new director general to the International
Atomic Energy Agency. U.S. Embassy cables, exposed by Manning, showed that
Japanese diplomat Yukiya Amano had been installed in 2009 as something of a
U.S.-Israeli puppet.

The significance of this information was that, without it, Amano’s IAEA
could have advanced the goal of Israeli leaders and U.S. neoconservatives
for war with Iran over its nuclear program by exaggerating the danger. That
propaganda strategy was undercut by Manning’s revelation that Amano was not
only installed by the U.S. government but was meeting secretly with Israeli
officials, ironically with Amano raising no complaints about Israel’s own
rogue nuclear arsenal.

When the cables about Amano came out a year after his appointment, Amano’s
IAEA was busy feeding the hysteria over Iran’s nuclear program with reports
that were trumpeted by major U.S. news outlets. IAEA’s alarm undercut Iran’s
denial about building a bomb and a 2007 U.S. intelligence estimate which
concluded that Iran had stopped work on a bomb in 2003.

So, I found it useful to examine the detailed documents regarding Amano’s
election. What those classified State Department cables showed was that
Amano credited his election largely to U.S. government support and then
stuck his hand out for more U.S. money. Further, Amano left little doubt
that he would side with the United States in its confrontation with Iran.

According to U.S. embassy cables from Vienna, Austria, the site of IAEA’s
headquarters, American diplomats in 2009 were cheering the prospect that
Amano would advance U.S. interests in ways that outgoing IAEA Director
General Mohamed ElBaradei wouldn’t.

In  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/216128> a
July 9, 2009, cable, American chargé Geoffrey Pyatt said Amano was thankful
for U.S. support of his election. “Amano attributed his election to support
from the U.S., Australia and France, and cited U.S. intervention with
Argentina as particularly decisive,” the cable said.

The appreciative Amano informed Pyatt that as IAEA director general, he
would take a different “approach on Iran from that of ElBaradei” and he “saw
his primary role as implementing safeguards and UNSC [United Nations
Security Council]/Board resolutions,” i.e. U.S.-driven sanctions and demands
against Iran.

Amano also discussed how to restructure the senior ranks of the IAEA,
including elimination of one top official and the retention of another. “We
wholly agree with Amano’s assessment of these two advisors and see these
decisions as positive first signs,” Pyatt commented.

A Hand-Out

In return, Pyatt made clear that Amano could expect strong U.S. financial
support, stating that “the United States would do everything possible to
support his successful tenure as Director General and, to that end,
anticipated that continued U.S. voluntary contributions to the IAEA would be
forthcoming. … Amano offered that a ‘reasonable increase’ in the regular
budget would be helpful.”

Pyatt learned, too, that Amano had consulted with Israeli Ambassador Israel
Michaeli “immediately after his appointment” and that Michaeli “was fully
confident of the priority Amano accords verification issues.” Michaeli added
that he discounted some of Amano’s public remarks about there being “no
evidence of Iran pursuing a nuclear weapons capability” as just words that
Amano felt he had to say “to persuade those who did not support him about
his ‘impartiality.’”

In private, Amano agreed to “consultations” with the head of the Israeli
Atomic Energy Commission, Pyatt reported. (It is ironic indeed that Amano
would have secret contacts with Israeli officials about Iran’s alleged
nuclear weapons program, which has yet to yield a single bomb, when Israel
possesses a large and undeclared nuclear arsenal.)

 <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/230076> In a
subsequent cable dated Oct. 16, 2009, the U.S. mission in Vienna said Amano
“took pains to emphasize his support for U.S. strategic objectives for the
Agency. Amano reminded ambassador [Glyn Davies] on several occasions that …
he was solidly in the U.S. court on every key strategic decision, from
high-level personnel appointments to the handling of Iran’s alleged nuclear
weapons program.

“More candidly, Amano noted the importance of maintaining a certain
‘constructive ambiguity’ about his plans, at least until he took over for DG
ElBaradei in December” 2009.

In other words, Amano was a bureaucrat eager to bend in directions favored
by the United States and Israel, especially regarding Iran’s nuclear
program. Amano’s behavior surely contrasts with how the more
independent-minded ElBaradei resisted some of Bush’s key claims about Iraq’s
supposed nuclear weapons program, correctly denouncing some documents as
forgeries.

The Amano cables, which Manning supplied to WikiLeaks, were first
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/julian-borger-global-security-blog/2010/nov
/30/iaea-wikileaks> spotlighted by the U.K. Guardian in 2010. However,
because the full cables were posted on the Internet, I was later able to dig
through them to find additional details, such as Amano asking for more U.S.
money.

Without this level of “ground truth,” Americans would be at the mercy of the
major U.S. news media, which seemed as much on board for a war with Iran as
it was for war with Iraq. The major U.S. news outlets have ignored the
cables about Amano and continue to present him and his IAEA as honest
brokers regarding Iran’s nuclear program. But millions of Americans know
better because of Pvt. Manning’s selfless disclosures.

Thus, the depth of gratitude for Manning’s actions should run deep. Indeed,
it is hard to calculate how many lives his disclosures may have saved and
how many mistakes he has helped the United States avoid. In a moral society,
he would be hailed as a national hero, rather than face prosecution and be
forced to humiliate himself in a desperate bid to avoid spending the rest of
his life in prison.

This injustice becomes even starker when you watch the choreographers of
George W. Bush’s torture policies and the architects of his Iraq War go
free. Or when you see the key “journalists” who facilitated the Bush-Cheney
crimes remain in high-paying and high-profile jobs.

After taking office, President Barack Obama let these war criminals and
their accomplices evade accountability with his infamous dictum about
“looking forward, not backward.” Yet, the ultimate hypocrisy in the case of
Bradley Manning is that Obama’s leniency only seems to apply to the war
criminals, not to the truth-tellers who expose the war criminals.

Investigative reporter Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories
for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s.

 

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to