Re: [Languagetool] Planning move to Maven

2012-10-03 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho
Hi, a good path to Maven Central is via the Sonatype OSS repository. This requires a LT maintainer to obtain a Jira account from Sonatype and open an issue requesting a Maven Central sync for the project. I'll already prep the POM for submission via Sonatype OSS. The process is documented here

Re: [Languagetool] Planning move to Maven

2012-09-16 Thread Daniel Naber
On 16.09.2012, 21:13:38 Nathan Wells wrote: > I think it will be great to have smaller downloads for each language. > Will this also translate to separate files for LibreOffice/OpenOffice > extensions to keep them small as well? Not in the first step I guess, but once we're more modular that sho

Re: [Languagetool] Planning move to Maven

2012-09-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho
Hello Daniel, Am 16.09.2012 um 17:23 schrieb Daniel Naber: >> Instead of scanning for subclasses, I'd suggest to define some location >> in META-INF where language modules can declare themselves. E.g. a file >> META-INF/org/languagetool/language-module.properties with a key/value >> like "languag

Re: [Languagetool] Planning move to Maven

2012-09-16 Thread Daniel Naber
On 16.09.2012, 16:35:16 Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: Hi Richard, thanks for your feedback. I'm not yet sure about this point: > Instead of scanning for subclasses, I'd suggest to define some location > in META-INF where language modules can declare themselves. E.g. a file > META-INF/org/lan

Re: [Languagetool] Planning move to Maven

2012-09-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho
Hi, > I'm not a Maven expert, so please provide your feedback about those ideas. I am picking up some sections from http://languagetool.wikidot.com/switching-to-maven: > To build all of LT in one go, we should have one "LanguageTool" Maven module > that includes all the other LT modules and wh

Re: [Languagetool] Planning move to Maven

2012-09-16 Thread Nathan Wells
Sounds good! I think it will be great to have smaller downloads for each language. Will this also translate to separate files for LibreOffice/OpenOffice extensions to keep them small as well? -nathan On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Daniel Naber wrote: > Hi, > > as you know, we're planning to

[Languagetool] Planning move to Maven

2012-09-16 Thread Daniel Naber
Hi, as you know, we're planning to have a Maven artifact for LT 1.9 - thanks to Richard supporting us with that. This will make it very easy for other Java developers to integrate LT. Which is important, considering the popularity of Maven in the Java ecosystem. The long-term goal however is n