Re: [Larceny-users] recursive lists and C-c problems

2008-12-09 Thread David Van Horn
William D Clinger wrote: Marco Maggi wrote: v0.97b1 is newer and should have fewer bugs. Is it also still open to very small non-language related changes? Yes. Fine. But is there a switch that makes larceny print some non-infinite output in R6RS-compatible-mode-for-everything-else?

Re: [Larceny-users] recursive lists and C-c problems

2008-12-09 Thread David Van Horn
David Van Horn wrote: William D Clinger wrote: No, but there should be. I'm waiting to see what happens with SRFI 38 and SRFI 97. SRFI 97 should be final by the end of the week. SRFI 37 was one of the omitted SRFIs from that proposal, so what exactly are waiting to see about, or what

Re: [Larceny-users] recursive lists and C-c problems

2008-12-09 Thread William D Clinger
David Van Horn wrote: Are you just waiting for SRFI 97 to go final? I have also been waiting for the end of the semester so I'd have time to work on v0.97 again. With the end of the semester upon us, I'm just waiting to see whether there will be any further changes to SRFI 97 before I start to

[Larceny-users] ANF size error with 0.97b1

2008-12-09 Thread Marco Maggi
With larceny-0.97b1-bin-native-ia32-linux86 I get this output: ANF size: 20396 and on the same program with larceny-0.963-bin-native-ia32-linux86 I get ANF size: 20416 the program works with both Ikarus and Ypsilon. It is complex to provide code, because I am using the R6RS port of the SRFI

Re: [Larceny-users] ANF size error with 0.97b1

2008-12-09 Thread William D Clinger
Marco Maggi (and I hope I typed it right this time!) wrote: Is it something to report as a bug? The ANF size: reports come from the compiler, and provide an estimate of the code size. Those messages were added to help us track down some performance bugs in compiler optimization. They shouldn't

Re: [Larceny-users] finding libraries

2008-12-09 Thread Jon Wells
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 23:11 -0500, William D Clinger wrote: v0.97 is also expected to allow dir-in-path/uriel/lang/compat.larceny.sls Slightly off topic but it seems to me that burying the name of an implementation in a file name as a mechanism for locating that implementation's

Re: [Larceny-users] ANF size error with 0.97b1

2008-12-09 Thread Marco Maggi
William D Clinger wrote: Is it something to report as a bug? The ANF size: reports come from the compiler, and provide an estimate of the code size. [...] It would probably be better for me to file that bug report. Thanks. The following script triggers the output; the import specs I have

Re: [Larceny-users] finding libraries

2008-12-09 Thread Marco Maggi
Jon Wells wrote: Has there ever been any discussion of allowing import clauses to appear anywhere other than the toplevel... I cannot speak for R6RS requests, but Ikarus allows it in non-R6RS mode. -- Marco Maggi Now feel the funk blast! Rage Against the Machine - Calm like a bomb