2009/5/6 Ramana Kumar ramana.ku...@gmail.com:
is there a good argument for set! to return unspecified?
Because Scheme is not C. Or C++ for that matter.
In more obfuscated terms: Mixing the state monad with referentially
transparent expressions is generally a bad idea. Scheme believes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felix Klock wrote:
Marijn (cc'ing larceny-users)-
On May 5, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
I have written syntax-case macro code that should construct this
function for arbitrary dimension, except I cannot get it to work. I
You'd be surprised. I have read those 'formal comments'; I just don't
think they contain any reasons to downgrade the formal semantics into
an optional appendix. Not one. Not a single one.
On May 5, 2009, at 12:42 PM, William D Clinger wrote:
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
For whatever
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
You'd be surprised. I have read those 'formal comments'; I just don't
think they contain any reasons to downgrade the formal semantics into
an optional appendix. Not one. Not a single one.
Well, no one ever said the R6RS was perfect.
Will
