Re: [Larceny-users] ERR5RS Default Record Printer

2007-11-25 Thread William D Clinger
Ray Racine asked: Is (record-updater (record-type-descriptor thread-rtd) 'printer) ...) valid ERR5RS or shall it be considered as a Larceny and therefore non-portable extension? That's Larceny-specific and therefore non-portable. There are likely to be some implementations of ERR5RS that

[Larceny-users] ERR5RS Default Record Printer

2007-11-24 Thread Ray Racine
I may have missed this in the new doc/scheme-punks wiki, but can one set a default printer for an ERR5RS record? Is (record-updater (record-type-descriptor thread-rtd) 'printer) ...) valid ERR5RS or shall it be considered as a Larceny and therefore non-portable extension? Thanks, Ray