Re: [Larceny-users] Larceny Runtime - SIGPIPE Handled?

2008-05-20 Thread William D Clinger
Ray Racine wrote: My test case is pretty easy on my side, but I'm struggling for a simple test case for the Larceny developers to test cross O/S. I think we can proceed on the basis of what you've already given us. OTOH, we may have a SIGPIPE put Larceny in the debugger by default, just as a

Re: [Larceny-users] Larceny Runtime - SIGPIPE Handled?

2008-05-19 Thread Ray Racine
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 23:18 -0500, Chris Brannon wrote: Are you checking the return value of write(2), to make sure that you don't do a partially successful write? Most people only check for a negative return value, assuming that they check at all. If your write(2) call doesn't write all

[Larceny-users] Larceny Runtime - SIGPIPE Handled?

2008-05-18 Thread Ray Racine
I have been doing some load testing, lots of threads/tasks with lots of socket io on my Larceny WebServer. Current test goes like this: 1. Client (browser, curl hammer scripts) makes an HTTP request to my Larceny WebServer. 2. The Larceny server in handling the request opens additional out