David Rush wrote: > I'm pretty sure that both PLT and Gambit have weak-reference and/or > object-finalization systems and I will try to take a look in the next > few days to express a preference.
Okay. > In the meantime, I guess I will > have to find out just how much memory I'm going to end up using > without fancy cache expiration machinery. It's always good to measure > first :) Bounded caches with timeouts are easy to implement in Larceny. Will _______________________________________________ Larceny-users mailing list Larceny-users@lists.ccs.neu.edu https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
