William D Clinger wrote:
Here's a brief report on their status
in the current development version of
Larceny: [...]
Thanks for all of this (the website
restyling is also good). In the next
weeks I will try to add support for
Larceny to my infrastructure.
Can I ask for a word on the status of
the
2008/12/24 Marco Maggi marco.maggi-i...@poste.it:
Can I ask for a word on the status of
the FFI? I do not strictly need the
callbacks right now, but can I trust
the callout mechanism and the raw
pokers and peekers?
Well this falls into the works for me category, but it works for me :)
I
On Dec 24, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Marco Maggi wrote:
Can I ask for a word on the status of
the FFI? I do not strictly need the
callbacks right now, but can I trust
the callout mechanism and the raw
pokers and peekers?
I think those are all trust-worthy, and their interface is unlikely to
Jon Wells wrote:
Has there ever been any discussion of allowing import clauses to appear
anywhere other than the toplevel...
Yes, there has been some discussion. However...
So one could...
(import (rnrs))
:
(if some-arbitrary-condition
(import (a guff))
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:20 -0500, William D Clinger wrote:
Jon Wells wrote:
Has there ever been any discussion of allowing import clauses to appear
anywhere other than the toplevel...
That would be a bad idea for several reasons. For
one thing, the scope of the conditional imports
would
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 23:11 -0500, William D Clinger wrote:
v0.97 is also expected to allow
dir-in-path/uriel/lang/compat.larceny.sls
Slightly off topic but it seems to me that burying the name of an
implementation in a file name as a mechanism for locating that
implementation's
Jon Wells wrote:
Has there ever been any discussion of
allowing import clauses to appear
anywhere other than the toplevel...
I cannot speak for R6RS requests, but
Ikarus allows it in non-R6RS mode.
--
Marco Maggi
Now feel the funk blast!
Rage Against the Machine - Calm like a bomb
Marco Moggie wrote:
Of course I can write a shell script that
makes use of an environment variable to build
the -path argument, but... make it simple!
You could, for example, edit the startup.sch file
documented in sections 3.2.4 of Larceny's User
Manual. If you prefer to use an environment
William D Clinger wrote:
Marco Moggie wrote:
(I am not a cat :-)
You could, for example, edit the
startup.sch file documented in sections
3.2.4 of Larceny's User Manual. If you
prefer to use an environment variable,
then you could edit the shell scripts
provided with Larceny.
All of this