Re: [Larceny-users] procedure introspection

2009-03-15 Thread William D Clinger
Jose A Ortega Ruiz (jao) wrote: Unless procedure-arity is extended to provide them, i'd be using procedure-expression to get the arguments' *names*, to display short help notices in emacs echo area (using eldoc). Larceny already retains the variable names, but we never extended

Re: [Larceny-users] incremental development in ERR5RS/larceny

2009-03-15 Thread William D Clinger
Jose A Ortega Ruiz (jao) wrote: Now, i'm wondering to what extent such an interactive way of hacking is possible in ERR5RS and, in particular, its Larceny incarnation (R6RS being out of the question since it ditchs the REPL). If i'm understanding things correctly, the ERR5RS equivalent of,

Re: [Larceny-users] turning on optimizations

2009-03-15 Thread William D Clinger
Marijn wrote: Am I doing it wrong or is there something that is just not implemented yet here? Larceny's benchmark-block-mode doesn't work, and hasn't for some time. The incremental compiler just ignores that switch, but compile-file reports the error you encountered if that switch is turned