Jose A Ortega Ruiz (jao) wrote:
Unless procedure-arity is extended to provide them, i'd be using
procedure-expression to get the arguments' *names*, to display short
help notices in emacs echo area (using eldoc).
Larceny already retains the variable names, but we never
extended
Jose A Ortega Ruiz (jao) wrote:
Now, i'm wondering to what extent such an interactive way of hacking is
possible in ERR5RS and, in particular, its Larceny incarnation (R6RS
being out of the question since it ditchs the REPL). If i'm
understanding things correctly, the ERR5RS equivalent of,
Marijn wrote:
Am I doing it wrong or is there something that is just not
implemented yet here?
Larceny's benchmark-block-mode doesn't work, and hasn't for
some time. The incremental compiler just ignores that switch,
but compile-file reports the error you encountered if that
switch is turned