Re: [LARTC] Routing problem (RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument) on multiple internet link.

2007-02-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 00:30 +0100, Paul Viney wrote: Wow! That made a difference. One echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth1/rp_filter and everything started working. Thanks a lot Torsten and Alex - I wouldn't have solved it without your suggestions. But the question I have had about this

Re: [LARTC] Routing problem (RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument) on multiple internet link.

2007-02-15 Thread Paul Viney
Wow! That made a difference. One echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth1/rp_filter and everything started working. Thanks a lot Torsten and Alex - I wouldn't have solved it without your suggestions. Paul Viney On Wednesday 14 February 2007 21:17, Torsten Luettgert wrote: This is one of my

Re: [LARTC] Routing problem (RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument) on multiple internet link.

2007-02-14 Thread Torsten Luettgert
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 22:54 +0100, Paul Viney wrote: I still seem to have much the same problem. I no longer get ICMP unreachable errors, but the packet just seems to disappear - I can't see it being forwarded on any interface, nor can I find any kind of reply - icmp or otherwise. This is

Re: [LARTC] Routing problem (RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument) on multiple internet link.

2007-02-14 Thread Alex Samad
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:30:48AM +0100, Paul Viney wrote: I still seem to have much the same problem. I no longer get ICMP unreachable errors, but the packet just seems to disappear - I can't see it being forwarded on any interface, nor can I find any kind of reply - icmp or

Re: [LARTC] Routing problem (RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument) on multiple internet link.

2007-02-13 Thread Alex Samad
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:50:13PM +0100, Paul Viney wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to set up a computer with 2 routes to the internet, much as described at http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html .One of my interfaces (eth5, 192.168.2.2) is only used for traffic originating

Re: [LARTC] Routing problem (RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument) on multiple internet link.

2007-02-13 Thread Paul Viney
Thanks for the advice, Alex. I've been able to add both default routes - I hadn't considered using the metric to avoid using the VPN link. I guess I wasn't very clear with my use of 64.233.183.103, which was meant to be a random internet address coming in over the VPN link, not the default

Re: [LARTC] Routing problem (RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument) on multiple internet link.

2007-02-13 Thread Alex Samad
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:54:51PM +0100, Paul Viney wrote: Thanks for the advice, Alex. I've been able to add both default routes - I hadn't considered using the metric to avoid using the VPN link. I guess I wasn't very clear with my use of 64.233.183.103, which was meant to be a random

Re: [LARTC] Routing problem (RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument) on multiple internet link.

2007-02-13 Thread Paul Viney
I still seem to have much the same problem. I no longer get ICMP unreachable errors, but the packet just seems to disappear - I can't see it being forwarded on any interface, nor can I find any kind of reply - icmp or otherwise. sounds like a firewall issue! It does sound like a

Re: [LARTC] Routing problem (RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument) on multiple internet link.

2007-02-13 Thread Paul Viney
If I type route add default gw 192.168.1.1 ip route flush cache then my forwarding suddenly starts working again, although the rest of my routing obviously doesn't do what I want any more. Weird. Paul Viney ___ LARTC mailing list