Do they charge you for download traffic or both for dowload/upload? If you
are in the first case, this slight modification in the wondershaper script
should do the trick.
## downlink #
# slow downloads down to somewhat less than the real speed to prevent
# queuing at our ISP.
Hi,
Related, not but strictly to do with tc, is there any way of concisely
and effectively logging connections between NATd users and external
IPs? I need to be able to maintain a log which tells me that a certain
user was connected to a certain remote host on a certain port at a
certain time
[Please keep me in CC/To, I don't read lartc often]
Mario Antonio Garcia wrote:
I used to get an average of 18900kbit.
My hope was that these new patches would bring better accuracy.
Well, you're up from 94.5% to 99.95%, so they seem to do :)
Notice the 24 cburst. I am just trying to
Ups, sorry, I did one mistake, I forgot we are filtering incoming traffic
and the we need to match destination ip. Also there is no need to filter the
hole subnet, so we can set the mask to 32. So this would be the result:
## downlink #
# slow downloads down to somewhat less
I just have noticed another thing, I just copied the filter but should be
given a different (lower) prio value. I'm not sure whether this is really
necessary, but I think that it is better to do so:
## downlink #
# slow downloads down to somewhat less than the real speed to
Sorry again and again, I've just noticed that gmail adds some odd
stuff to the text version of my mails, so this is the definitive (I
hope):
## downlink #
# slow downloads down to somewhat less than the real speed to prevent
# queuing at our ISP. Tune to see how high you can
On 9/2/07, Javier Ors [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry again and again, I've just noticed that gmail adds some odd
stuff to the text version of my mails, so this is the definitive (I
hope):
Hola Javier,
Thanks for your reply.
Replying to your first question, yes, both upload and download
I get following error while run the command
iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -m u32 --u32 160x0001=0x -j MARK
--set-mark 0x10
error iptables v1.2.11: Couldn't load match
`u32':/lib/iptables/libipt_u32.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
I m using FC3 Linux Kernel
I tried this, but it doesn't seem to be making any change at all,
unfortunately. I started a large download from ftp.kernel.org and it
was still coming full steam ahead. I let it go on for a minute or two,
hoping it would eventually start to be throttled, but no dice. Is
there perhaps any
On 9/2/07, Javier Ors [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know. You can also limit with iptables, but should be ok with
this tc filter. Did the script run without errors after making the
changes? Can you check that the filter is really present with tc
filter show dev (your-device) and paste the
Mm, could you please post the output of this other command?
tc -s filter show dev eth0 parent :
I've searched a little bit and I think that this solution is not going
to work, sorry, I would do the tests on my own machine but for the
moment this is not possible...
If it is what I'm
On 9/2/07, Javier Ors [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello again Javier
Mm, could you please post the output of this other command?
tc -s filter show dev eth0 parent :
Sure!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root# tc -s filter show dev eth0 parent :
filter protocol ip pref 49 u32
filter protocol ip
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 03:25:11PM +0500, Arman wrote:
Thats fine but primary problem is that only one connection is used at a time
but I want to utilize both at the same time. Please guide
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jorge Evangelista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On 8/31/07, DervishD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all :)
I think that this issue has already been discussed on this list, but
google didn't find anything interesting, so I'm bringing the subject
again.
The output of tc uses b meaning byte and bit for bit. The
official suffixes
14 matches
Mail list logo
