On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 09:52 +1200, Don Gould wrote:
I'm getting a small stream of old posts and spam off this list.
Are others seeing same?
I've just had a load. Maybe they were a pile of messages that were held
for moderation and have just all been approved?
Would be nice to see some
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 00:11 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
WHY DO I GET MESSAGES from the list if I am unsubscribbed since years?
Are you sure you were unsubscribed? The list has been very quiet for a
long time...
Andy
___
LARTC mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Same here...
On 05/04/2011 09:04 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 09:52 +1200, Don Gould wrote:
I'm getting a small stream of old posts and spam off this list.
Are others seeing same?
I've just had a load. Maybe they were a
On 2011-05-04 05:43, Andreas Unterkircher wrote:
Same here, after having not received mails from this list for a long,
long time.
On 05/03/2011 11:52 PM, Don Gould wrote:
I'm getting a small stream of old posts and spam off this list.
Are others seeing same?
Yes, same here, I have not
The list is alive! :-D
On 5/4/2011 10:26 AM, Kim Bak wrote:
On 2011-05-04 05:43, Andreas Unterkircher wrote:
Same here, after having not received mails from this list for a long,
long time.
On 05/03/2011 11:52 PM, Don Gould wrote:
I'm getting a small stream of old posts and spam off this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hehe,
must be my fault. I joined the list yesterday and have got nothing but
spam, old messages and comments on how broken the list is since ;-)
The web interface to mailman is painfully slow too.
Meanwhile I'll keep reading, maybe at some point
Anyone managing the list can shed some light on the status of this list?
I for once wouldn't mind doing some moderation (if needed of course)...
2011/5/4 Kim Bak bur...@clanpips.dk
On 2011-05-04 05:43, Andreas Unterkircher wrote:
Same here, after having not received mails from this list for
Unfortunately, I think it all went to h*ll and back. I'll be more than
willing to create a new list under my own domain and we can start
discussing Linux routing once more. Anybody want me to do that?
On 05/04/2011 04:02 PM, João Almeida wrote:
Anyone managing the list can shed some light on
On 04/05/2011 18:56, Radu Oprisan wrote:
Unfortunately, I think it all went to h*ll and back. I'll be more than
willing to create a new list under my own domain and we can start
discussing Linux routing once more. Anybody want me to do that?
Flip that would be awesome, and appreciated.
Linux
I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST). Think
we can get somebody else to join?
On 05/04/2011 08:02 PM, Brent Clark wrote:
On 04/05/2011 18:56, Radu Oprisan wrote:
Unfortunately, I think it all went to h*ll and back. I'll be more
than willing to create a new list
On 05/04/11 12:03, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST).
Think we can get somebody else to join?
I'm not opposed to a new mailing list in and of its self.
However I think that this list (LARTC) is well known and documented all
over the place.
Hello Andrew Beverley,
Am 2011-05-04 07:05:18, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 00:11 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
WHY DO I GET MESSAGES from the list if I am unsubscribbed since years?
Are you sure you were unsubscribed? The list has been very quiet for a
long
On 05/04/2011 09:06 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 12:03, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST).
Think we can get somebody else to join?
I'm not opposed to a new mailing list in and of its self.
However I think that this list (LARTC) is
Constantinescu Daniel Eduard
ASE_wsrgb
image001.jpg___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
I agree with Grant.
Greg.
On 04 Μαϊ 2011, at 21:06 , Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 12:03, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST).
Think we can get somebody else to join?
I'm not opposed to a new mailing list in and of its self.
However I
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
True. We shall wait then for more information. On the other hand, I will
try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to take over
this one.
I will say that this is the first time in approximately two years that
this mailing list has seemed
going to have to agree... is nice to see however. =)
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:11 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
True. We shall wait then for more information. On the other hand, I will
try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to take over
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list so
that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed
How to unsubscribe from this spam list ?
( i cannot receive password from reminder)
Please help me
Regards
Radek
--
From: Grant Taylor gtay...@riverviewtech.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 9:24 PM
To: Mail List - Linux Advanced Routing and
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:24 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
In Favor...
Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA
On 05/04/2011 12:24 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Agreed.
On 05/04/2011 10:24 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
so that it
On 05/04/11 14:33, Radoslaw Horodniczy wrote:
How to unsubscribe from this spam list ?
The list may be (have been) broken, but it's not a source of spam.
( i cannot receive password from reminder)
That's odd.
If you are able to receive posts to the list, you should be able to
receive the
Aye.
Greg
On 04 Μαϊ 2011, at 22:24 , Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list so
On 05/04/2011 10:24 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
so that it sets the
Am 04.05.2011 21:24, schrieb Grant Taylor:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
so that it sets the
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list so
that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed back to
the mailing list (as a discussion list)?
All in favor?
Any one against?
From RFC2822 (my emphasis):
When the Reply-To: field is present, it
On 05/04/2011 10:15 PM, Ruben Rögels wrote:
Am 04.05.2011 21:24, schrieb Grant Taylor:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to
Dear Spammers,
Thanks for waking everyone on the list up last night. ;)
Dear List,
Now that you're all awake, and following the number of requests for some
technical discussion, here's my current challenge on my little research
project...
Yes, I'm wanting to figure out the following for a
On 05/04/11 16:30, Don Gould wrote:
However I don't want people on 2.0 to be able to see computers in 3.0 or
4.0, etc.
What about 3.0 and 4.0 being able to see other subnets 2.0 / 4.0 and 2.0
/ 3.0 (respectively)?
I also don't want them to be able to establish windows networking
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:11 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
True. We shall wait then for more information. On the other hand, I will
try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to take over
this one.
I will say that this is the first time in
On 5/05/2011 9:45 a.m., Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 16:30, Don Gould wrote:
However I don't want people on 2.0 to be able to see computers in 3.0 or
4.0, etc.
What about 3.0 and 4.0 being able to see other subnets 2.0 / 4.0 and
2.0 / 3.0 (respectively)?
Sorry, my bad.
I want to block,
Hello Grant Taylor,
Am 2011-05-04 14:24:17, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
take over this one.
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the
I'm all for just seeing if we can get to the list admin and just get the
existing list back up to scratch.
Who is the list admin?
Do we just need a new admin or supporter? Has the existing person just
got past being able to do the role (ie busy with work, family, what ever
:) )
D
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:06 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 12:03, Radu Oprisan wrote:
I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST).
Think we can get somebody else to join?
I'm not opposed to a new mailing list in and of its self.
However I think that this
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:56 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:11 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
True. We shall wait then for more information. On the other hand, I will
try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to take
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:24 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
All in favor?
Any one against?
In favour.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
+1
-Original Message-
From: lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl] On
Behalf Of Russell Stuart
Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2011 9:41 AM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] List fault?
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:24 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
All in
+1
--Original Message--
From: Alex Samad
Sender: lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
ReplyTo: a...@samad.com.au
Subject: RE: [LARTC] List fault?
Sent: May 5, 2011 06:56
+1
-Original Message-
From: lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:06 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
Seeing that now messages seem to be flowing in a timely manner, I'd
suggest that we give this list a week to a month probation to see if
it has straightened up it's act.I'd also like a comment from the list
maintainer or a moderator in
Yes, agree, affirmative, aye
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Russell Stuart
russell-la...@stuart.id.au wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:06 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
Seeing that now messages seem to be flowing in a timely manner, I'd
suggest that we give this list a week to a month probation
Hello Grant Taylor,
Am 2011-05-04 14:24:17, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
(I'll make this pitch again.)
Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
so that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed
back to the mailing list (as a discussion list)?
42 matches
Mail list logo
