On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 06:11:26AM +0200, Daniel Frederiksen wrote:
> Ok folks, here goes..
>
> I have been boggling with a problem for the past week, and still haven't
> found a solution..
>
> I'm trying to route traffic from two providers through a Linux machine.
> But that is not the problem.
Hi
Can any one point me to any doco on the multipath patches that have been
added to the 2.6.13+
There now seems to be modules multipath_cached multipath_random
multipath_rr etc
Thanks
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
LARTC mailing
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:59:32PM -0500, Jody Shumaker wrote:
> I found that for ppp devices, i should ony define the next hop with the
> dev, not a via. However this still didn't fix my problem, but I've narrowed
> down my problem a little further.
>
> # ip route get 66.189.123.136
> 66.189.12
the reverse order it was ppp0.
> All this by only changing the order of the nexthops. I went through and
> double checked that I did apply julian's patches to the kernel source I last
> built with.
>
> - Jody
>
> On 1/16/06, Alexander Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
EMPT w/ julian's patches and iptables
> v1.3.4
>
> - Jody
>
> On 1/17/06, Alexander Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:37:48AM -0500, Jody Shumaker wrote:
> > > Yes, it just shows you what is in the cache, but I was speci
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:30:48PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> Ive had a poke around through various linux routing documents,
> but haven't found what I think is an elegant solution to a
> routing issue I'm having with a hosting provider and RHEL ES 4 running
> in a VMware VM.
>
> H
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:49:02PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
> Alexander Samad wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 01:30:48PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
> >>
> >>Hello,
> >>Ive had a poke around through various linux routing documents,
> >>but haven
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 12:57:10PM -0800, Marius M wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a linux router with 2 interfaces(eth0 - ISP and
> eth1 - LAN). I've established a VPN
> connection(openvpn) over eth0 with a friend of mine =>
> tun0 interface.
>
> I want half of my LAN to have Internet access thro
Hi
I have just moved my firewall from a 2.6 debian machine to a 2.4.30
openwrt (linksys wrt54gs) box.
I orginially had this working with 2 isp, 1 cable 1 adsl and dyndns.
Now when i have moved to 2.4.30 I am having problems. Everything else
is working fine except when I DNAT packets from the fi
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:04:18AM +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have just moved my firewall from a 2.6 debian machine to a 2.4.30
> openwrt (linksys wrt54gs) box.
>
> I orginially had this working with 2 isp, 1 cable 1 adsl and dyndns.
>
> Now when i have mov
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:27:53AM +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:04:18AM +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have just moved my firewall from a 2.6 debian machine to a 2.4.30
> > openwrt (linksys wrt54gs) box.
> >
> &g
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:44:57AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Damjan wrote:
> >>> I wonder about the performance of a Linux box used as router (I guest I'm
> >>> not the first :). Althought I know it mainly depends on the hardware, I'm
> >>> trying to find some references on the topic o
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 04:03:29AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Alexander Samad wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:44:57AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> >> Damjan wrote:
> >>>>> I wonder about the performance of a Linux box used as router (
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 02:33:02PM +0300, Wennie V. Lagmay wrote:
> Hi all,
> I want to create a log on Iptables wherein to store and to identify which
> private Ip is connected on public Ip on a certain date and time. Can you
> help me on this
tcpdump
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wennie
>
>
Yes, agree, affirmative, aye
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Russell Stuart
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:06 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
>> Seeing that now messages seem to be flowing in a timely manner, I'd
>> suggest that we give this list a week to a month probation to see if
>> it has str
Hi
I am trying to setup symetrical routing to a mutlihomed linux box.
Basically I haev a linux box with 3 interfaces front, back and backup
From another pc (3-4 hops away )) I would like to be able to ping both
the front and have the return path take the same route.
so server
eth0 10.124.167.2
what do you get when you try
ip r g 3030::254
A
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:57:17AM +0100, filipe abrantes wrote:
> * sorry for the other schema, it came out a mess. I hope this one is
> understandable.
>
> hi:
>
> I have this 2 boxes set up like this:
>
>
> 2020::2/128
54
> 3030::254 via 3030::254 dev eth0 src 2020::2 metric 0
> cache mtu 1500 advmss 1440
>
>
>
> Alexander Samad wrote:
> what do you get when you try
>
>
> ip r g 3030::254
>
> A
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:57:17AM +0100,
Hi
What you can do is mark the packets in netfilter (iptables) and then use
the marks to assign the packets to classes
you can do something like
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s AddrIWantToShape -j mark 0x02
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s AddrIWantToShape2 -j mark 0x03
iptables -t nat -
Hi
I think what you need to look for is marking of packets with netfilter -
let it classify and then used tc to place the properly marked packets
into the proper queue
Because you can mark in the PREROUTING table in mangle before it is enc
Alex
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:01:57PM -0600, Jamin W.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:31:28PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:16:54AM +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
> >
> > I think what you need to look for is marking of packets with netfilter -
> > let it classify and then used tc to place the properly ma
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 10:46:01PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >But will the mark still exist after the encryption/encapsulation?
> >>not so about ingres, but the marking stay with the packet after the enc
> >>( well on 2.6 with native stack it does). I use this for marking
> >>packets.
>
>
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:05:41AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Host A has two interfaces: eth0, tap0.
> I want that all locally generated traffic from user 1004 goes through
> tap0.
>
> This is what I did:
>
> iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -m owner --uid-owner 1004 -j MARK --set-mar
Hi
would it be possible to post the scripts that set this up ???
Alex
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 05:55:36PM +0100, Neil Greatorex wrote:
> Many thanks to both of you for your replies.
>
> I have managed to get the setup working how I intended now - by using HTB
> classes/qdiscs. I had tried this a
Hi
I have been trying to setup multiple defaults routes with equal
weighting I can do it with
route add -net default gw 10.18.141.254
route add -net default gw 10.18.141.252
route add -net default gw 10.18.141.253
but if I try this setup with ip r i have to place each one on different
weight le
Hi
I have setup iproute2 and need a bit of help reading the stats from it
= output
qdisc htb 1: r2q 10 default 20 direct_packets_stat 0 ver 3.17
Sent 547326809 bytes 1342627 pkts (dropped 9303, overlimits 2817572
requeues 0)
backlog 46p
qdisc sfq 10: limit 128p quantum 1514b flows 128/10
tc_start
;;
show)
tc_show
;;
*)
tc_show
#exit 1
;;
esac
exit 0
Thanks
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:18:29PM +0200, Stef Coene wrote:
> On Thursday 21 October 2004 11:59, Alexander Samad wrote:
> > class htb 1:30
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:31:52PM +0100, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Adrian Turcu wrote:
> >Hello list members,
>
> There is alot of work going on with tc at the moment - There are/will be
> lots more matches and the ability to run iptables commands from filters.
Is there any doco on this functionali
Hi
Recently I upgraded my kernel to 2.6.11 (debian) and applied some
patches from pom-ng (netfilter) and the iproute2-ss050330 package
I have been experiencing a lot of crashes in the kernel (snip below)
==
Apr 5 20:00:21 sydlxfw01 kernel: Unable to handle kernel
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:58:00AM +0200, Arjen Meek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:15:19AM +0200, Michael Renzmann wrote:
> > I agree, but I also see no reason to have this discussion arising over
> > and over again. Local filtering should do the trick until that moron
> > understands that
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:41:55PM -0700, gypsy wrote:
> Christian Schmid wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
>
> > 80.237.244.0/26 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 80.237.244.52
> > default
> > nexthop via 80.237.244.1 dev eth1 weight 100
> > nexthop via 80.237.244.33 dev eth1 weigh
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 04:06:12PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 20:11 +0200, Markus Schulz wrote:
> > Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 16:05 schrieb Rafael A Barrero:
> > > Hi guys;
> > >
> > [...]
> > > Here's what I want to know:
> > > 1. Does an updated guide exist for multiple p
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:02:20PM +0200, Markus Feilner wrote:
> Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 17:58 schrieb Sylvain BERTRAND:
> > On Lun 9 mai 2005 17:14, Rafael A Barrero a ?crit :
> > > Hey;
> > >
> > > I guess I should have included that aspect : what I want to
> > > achieve.
> > >
> > > I'd ideally
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Paulo Andre wrote:
> Markus Schulz wrote:
> > Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 16:05 schrieb Rafael A Barrero:
> >
> >>Hi guys;
> >>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>Here's what I want to know:
> >>1. Does an updated guide exist for multiple providers?
> >
> >
> > Look at
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 08:00:30AM +0200, Hamish Whittal wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have the following configuration:
> ___
> ++/
> diginet link
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:40:56AM +0200, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> On Jeu 12 mai 2005 8:14, Lee Sanders a ?crit :
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been playing with QOS for a short while now and have worked out how
> > to do
> > what I want using HTB. Great queuing discipline btw.
> >
> > My problem is th
36 matches
Mail list logo
