On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:54:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a linux server running kernel 2.6.19 that is connected with 2
seperate 100Mbit links to the same isp:
+---+
+---+ | I |
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 06:44:54PM -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 01/15/07 15:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, that's a complicated solution. Nicely done:) But I think that's a
bit too complicated for my setup thx for the input anyway.
Thanks.
Indeed the set up is not simple. You
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:03:21AM +0100, Jordi Segues wrote:
Hello,
I've done this some montsh ago, with a command like:
ip route add default equalize scope global nexthop via $EXTGW1 dev
$EXTIF1 weight 1 nexthop via $EXTGW2 dev $EXTIF2 weight 1
However, this is not the problem.
While
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Jordi Segues wrote:
the above is actually covered in the wiki howto. Bu tyou need to setup
snat on
each interface, then connection tracking takes care of sending each stream
out
the right interface, you need to use snat and not MASQ.
Great news
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:53:23PM +, Andrew Beverley wrote:
I'm not aware of one, and I think it's an excellent idea.
There's some great software available for LARTC, and some of the
documentation is very good, but unfortunately it's all a bit disparate.
A wiki would be a great start.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:14:56AM +0900, GodSharp wrote:
Hi Guys,
Just wondering for some reason when I switched providers(DSL) IP aliasing
stopped working. And, I am not sure what kind of modem this is, the previous
one had some Ethernet ports at the back(it has a bult-in 4 port switch)
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:17:03PM +0100, Fabio Muzzi wrote:
Hi, this is my first post to the list.
I have googled a lot, and still cannot find a proper solution. I hope
someone here will be able to shed some light on my doubts.
I have set up a firewall using kernel 2.6.15
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:50:13PM +0100, Paul Viney wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up a computer with 2 routes to the internet, much as
described at http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html .One of my
interfaces (eth5, 192.168.2.2) is only used for traffic originating
:40, Alex Samad wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:50:13PM +0100, Paul Viney wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up a computer with 2 routes to the internet, much as
described at http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html .One
of my interfaces (eth5, 192.168.2.2) is only used
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:30:48AM +0100, Paul Viney wrote:
I still seem to have much the same problem. I no longer get ICMP
unreachable errors, but the packet just seems to disappear - I can't see
it being forwarded on any interface, nor can I find any kind of reply -
icmp or
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:23:42PM +0800, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
From: Luciano Ruete [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This solution works in theory and in practice, so plz, get your hands dirty
before you post your next great idea.
I understand your explanation fully but believe me I also have got
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:12:17AM +0700, Denny Zulfikar wrote:
Hello korey,
I don't think your configuration will work well, because there're
balancing using weight connection. So, if you have
connection-oriented-application that must sure passing their traffic
only from one connection
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:22:13AM +0530, Manish Kathuria wrote:
On 3/2/07, Tom Lobato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
After that good thread DGD patch not detecting dead gateway I was
able to set up a Load Balancing with ping based DGD (without Julian
Anastasov patch). But
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:34:34PM +0100, francesco messineo wrote:
I solved this exact problem (with incoming connections on three
different adsl) markin packets on PREROUTING chain. Obviously with
three different routing tables.
# incoming connections for DNAT to DMZ need to be marked here
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:50:30AM +0800, Salim S I wrote:
I solved it, thought a bit ugly.
Have two more rules now in ip ru
32150: from all lookup main
32201: from all fwmark 0x200/0x200 lookup wan1_route
32202: from all fwmark 0x400/0x400 lookup wan2_route
32203: from 10.20.0.137
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 05:54:46PM -0500, Greg Scott wrote:
Hi -
Still plugging away at my Linux bridge/firewall and thinking through the
consequences. In a normal firewall situation, the Internet is on one
side, the internal LAN on the other. Duh! But now, with a Linux bridge
in the
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:35:46PM -0500, Greg Scott wrote:
out of curiosity why would you want to bridge at the firewall. is
this meant to be a drop in-line firewall appliance
Long story but yes, it is essentially a drop in-line system. It's a
mess.
So will that Internet router
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:35:13PM +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Grant Taylor wrote:
I need a way for the Linux kernel to try to use a default gateway and
switch to another one if it does not see any traffic.
should something like this work
default proto static metric 5 nexthop via
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 04:24:19PM -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 06/21/07 16:01, Alex Samad wrote:
should something like this work
default proto static metric 5
nexthop via 58.173.108.1 dev vlan2 weight 10
nexthop via 10.20.20.106 dev ppp0 weight 20
and then let the dgd
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:23:23PM -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 06/21/07 17:18, Alex Samad wrote:
sorry yep, just woken up, reading and answering whilst eating breakfast
*nod*
okay then why not
default via preffered path
default via backup path metric 100
I've done
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 03:25:11PM +0500, Arman wrote:
Thats fine but primary problem is that only one connection is used at a time
but I want to utilize both at the same time. Please guide
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jorge Evangelista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:36:18PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to create a routed VPN using OpenVPN - and having trouble with
the routing concepts involved. Let me see if I can properly describe my
current topology:
Server -
LAN, with both local workstations and remote
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:40:29PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Alex Samad wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:36:18PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to create a routed VPN using OpenVPN - and having trouble with
the routing concepts involved. Let me see if I can
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 03:48:13PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:40:29PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Alex Samad wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:36:18PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to create a routed VPN
Hi
Currently I use snmp to scrap information from my router about its interfaces,
does any one have an easy way of scaping information from tc rules to place
into a rrd db ?
do I need to put together a perl script to extract it from the output ?
Alex
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:07:10PM +1000, Tim Groeneveld wrote:
Greeting all,
I have a bit of a complicated question.
I have two ethernet devices, eth1 and eth2.
eth1 is where my internet comes from. It is in the form of
202.172.122.208/29.
It has another IP range, 202.172.122.72/29.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 02:00:14PM -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
On 10/25/07, Peter Rabbitson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately not easy without doing local NAT (from the local interface
to another local interface).
Can you use marking, mark the packet in the mangle table, us iptables to
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:09:52PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
see cache_peer !!
squid can load balance between 3 servers and cache it !!
run squid on your box with real ip..
Thanks for your quick answer. I know about reverse proxy. I wanted to know
that without squid,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:19:22AM +0100, Radek 'Goblin' Pieczonka wrote:
Suppose, I have 3 mail servers @ DMZ zone with one real ip. the situation
as before?
in that case, What can I do?
your could use exim/postfix and route the mail to the right server, but I
guess you are trying
+1
-Original Message-
From: lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-boun...@mailman.ds9a.nl] On
Behalf Of Russell Stuart
Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2011 9:41 AM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] List fault?
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:24 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
All in
30 matches
Mail list logo
