moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kathy E wrote:
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very Funny Mac! LOL Y'all are giving TX a bad name, btw if you look
Florida is the one that has been "chair" happy lately, not TX.
Mornin' Kathy,
Yeah but Texas is darn right next door! Could save
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie:
Like Doc said, "said". :) Just seems funny that it wouldn't come up at
all until now, not even when he was accused of sexual problems with his
half sister. Wonder why it didn't come out then? I guess everything
will come out sooner or
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronald Helm wrote:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
I was wondering that myself. If I read the story correctly they are
saying the kid never told anyone about this until after the murders.
Doesn't that seem a bit odd?
Bill
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Doc
Agree it is "said" not collaborated. Quite a bit of commentary by locals
was included, as the town is so small and it would be very quickly known
here where he went to daycare. So don't know what more is going to be shown
here.
jackief
DocCec
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Bill:
There should be a semi adult place for these kids, with lots and lots of
counseling and help. They shouldn't be put into the adult prison
system, nor do I think that juvenile hall is appropriate either. 4
years for the murder of 5 people is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 07 Apr 1998 15:19:03 -0400 moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mornin' jackie,
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Sue
Yes, it seems strange. I am wondering how it is going to go over in the
town of Grand Meadow. This is a really small town, so I would imagine any
daycare provider, if the boy was there, would immediately be known by the
residents. Haven't seen
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DocCec wrote:
DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 98-04-07 21:32:22 EDT, you write:
The case under appeal is a hearing on Miranda rights. The state is
wanting the lower court's decision to suppress the confession because
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Kathy,
LOL...not only do you drag me into a discussion where I'm not commenting
about anything you misstate the facts. I never said anything about
"that's still a lot of executions." You must be thinking of someone
else.
As I've stated
DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 98-04-07 21:32:22 EDT, you write:
The case under appeal is a hearing on Miranda rights. The state is
wanting the lower court's decision to suppress the confession because
Miranda rights weren't given at the beginning of the interview with
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jackie Fellows wrote:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all
Just on the news this morning. Said he was abused repetitively by a
relative of the day care center he was in when 6 and/or 7. That's is
really all I heard--imagine there will
DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 98-04-07 07:06:12 EDT, you write:
Just on the news this morning. Said he was abused repetitively by a
relative of the day care center he was in when 6 and/or 7. That's is
really all I heard--imagine there will be more.
jackief
At
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mornin' jackie, I'm surprised it took this long for the defense to
put this story out.
...Mac
Hi Mac,
I was wondering that myself.
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
I was wondering that myself. If I read the story correctly they are
saying the kid never told anyone about this until after the murders.
Doesn't that seem a bit odd?
Bill
Incredible, now even little criminals are aware that the "abuse excuse"
14 matches
Mail list logo
