On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:16 PM Brian via Lazarus
wrote:
> ... and errors from deep inside code libraries tend to throw me,
> especially when it's object oriented code (yes, I'm that old).
ValidUTF8String and Utf8EscapeControlChars are global functions.
Nothing object oriented there. :)
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:16 PM Brian via Lazarus
wrote:
> Maybe not, but my point is that I was running the 1.8.4 .DEBs from
> SourceForge with no problems.
Yes but you are confusing unrelated things now.
You were running Lazarus 1.8.4 with no problems because it had only
deprecated
Am 24.10.2018 um 22:23 schrieb Luca Olivetti via Lazarus:
El 24/10/18 a les 22:11, Sven Barth via Lazarus ha escrit:
Am 24.10.2018 um 21:35 schrieb Luca Olivetti via Lazarus:
El 24/10/18 a les 13:10, Juha Manninen via Lazarus ha escrit:
Why old Lazarus 1.8.4? Why don't you use the new 2.0
El 24/10/18 a les 22:11, Sven Barth via Lazarus ha escrit:
Am 24.10.2018 um 21:35 schrieb Luca Olivetti via Lazarus:
El 24/10/18 a les 13:10, Juha Manninen via Lazarus ha escrit:
Why old Lazarus 1.8.4? Why don't you use the new 2.0 branch?
I still have to keep 1.6.4 around due to a bug
Am 24.10.2018 um 21:35 schrieb Luca Olivetti via Lazarus:
El 24/10/18 a les 13:10, Juha Manninen via Lazarus ha escrit:
Why old Lazarus 1.8.4? Why don't you use the new 2.0 branch?
I still have to keep 1.6.4 around due to a bug with bitpacked records
in fpc 3.
I use 1.8.4 for projects I
El 24/10/18 a les 13:10, Juha Manninen via Lazarus ha escrit:
Why old Lazarus 1.8.4? Why don't you use the new 2.0 branch?
I still have to keep 1.6.4 around due to a bug with bitpacked records in
fpc 3.
I use 1.8.4 for projects I can compile with fpc 3 (even if I provided
some bug reports
On 10/24/2018 11:54 AM, Juha Manninen via Lazarus wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:45 PM Brian via Lazarus
> wrote:
>> Well, here's an example for you of why people may refuse to use SVN.
>>
>> I downloaded the sources via svn and built Lazarus, no problem in that
>> step.
>>
>> Then I ran V2.0
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:52 PM Bo Berglund via Lazarus
wrote:
> I have always been using the tags list:
> https://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/tags/
> and here are only immutable snapsots where I select the latest not set as RCx.
> Is that a bad practice?
It is not bad but I think using the
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:05:05 +0200, Bo Berglund via Lazarus
wrote:
>"The file 'dl-error-skeleton.c' was not found.
>Do you want to locate it yourself?"
>
>So maybe a file needed by the Indy10 Pop3 component is not part of the
>package
>
Now I have nailed the problem with the
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:58:44 +0300, Juha Manninen via Lazarus
wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 4:22 PM Bo Berglund via Lazarus
> wrote:
>> >Why old Lazarus 1.8.4? Why don't you use the new 2.0 branch?
>> Because it was the latest release tag I found...
>
>You found the release tag in fixes_1_8
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 4:22 PM Bo Berglund via Lazarus
wrote:
> >Why old Lazarus 1.8.4? Why don't you use the new 2.0 branch?
> Because it was the latest release tag I found...
You found the release tag in fixes_1_8 branch?
Ok, 2.0 has not been released yet but it will be soon(?). I dare to
say
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:21 PM Brian via Lazarus
wrote:
> I can't speak for why other people won't do it, but before I retired,
> I worked for a division of an extremely large company with a 'managed
> PC' environment, where we were strictly forbidden to install anything
> which could be
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:10:33 +0300, Juha Manninen via Lazarus
wrote:
>Why old Lazarus 1.8.4? Why don't you use the new 2.0 branch?
Because it was the latest release tag I found...
--
Bo Berglund
Developer in Sweden
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 10/24/2018 05:19 AM, Juha Manninen via Lazarus wrote:
> Building Lazarus from sources using "svn co" and "make" is so easy
> that I wonder why people refuse to do it.
> People want to try anything except for this most obvious and easiest
> way, including fpcupdeluxe which is an overkill for
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 1:19 PM Bo Berglund via Lazarus
wrote:
> No, I decided to go the route of checking out the release sources and
> build from them. Needed the seed compiler 3.0.0 but advice here led me
> to where that could be fetched (important: It must be the 64 bit seed
> compiler!).
On 23/10/2018 23:42, Martin Grajcar via Lazarus wrote:
My process may get started with or without console. In the latter
case, any write leads to "Disk full" on MacOS. As I can't eliminate
all writes, I'd need to open both stdout and stderr as /dev/null.
Have a look at logger frameworks.
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:19:44 +0200, Bo Berglund via Lazarus
wrote:
>But I have another issue:
>My ported application uses Indy10 with the SMTP component and it must
>use SSL. On Windows I have put two SSL dll:s (libeay32.dll and
>ssleay32.dll) in the executable dir in order to get that going,
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 02:38:14 +0300, Juha Manninen via Lazarus
wrote:
>As an extra bonus you will get latest bug fixes in future by running "svn up".
>My prediction is that you will ignore this advice and start to bang
>your head with .deb packages like many others do. The forum is full of
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:21 AM Brian via Lazarus
wrote:
> FWIW, all that I've done (using Ubuntu 18.04, but also with previous
> versions of Ubuntu and Debian) is to lock all the FPC and Lazarus
> packages against upgrade from the repositories. When a new version
> comes out, I just download
On 10/24/2018 03:32 AM, Juha Manninen via Lazarus wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:40 AM Brian via Lazarus
> wrote:
>> Just out of curiosity, might I ask how you feel about running the
>> .DEBs downloaded from SourceForge?
>
> Apparently you have not read the forum threads about the issues
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:40 AM Brian via Lazarus
wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, might I ask how you feel about running the
> .DEBs downloaded from SourceForge?
Apparently you have not read the forum threads about the issues caused
by .DEBs. :)
There are literally hundreds of them. Here is one:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 4:57 AM Teresa Williams via Lazarus
wrote:
> I have done this several times on opensuse Leap 14 and 15. Each time I have
> had fpc installed first: is that what you meant? Or does the svn repository
> include fpc now?
Yes, FPC must be installed first. Version 3.02 is
22 matches
Mail list logo
