Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Release 2.0.0

2019-02-13 Thread Luca Olivetti via lazarus
El 5/2/19 a les 11:48, Mattias Gaertner via lazarus ha escrit: The Lazarus team is glad to announce the release of Lazarus 2.0.0. This release was built with FPC 3.0.4. The previous release Lazarus 1.8.4 was built with FPC 3.0.4 as well. Here is the list of changes for Lazarus and Free Pascal:

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus with fpc 3.2 [was Re: [fpc-devel] Suspicion about TThread.Synchronize]

2019-02-13 Thread Luca Olivetti via lazarus
El 13/2/19 a les 23:56, Werner Pamler via lazarus ha escrit: Am 13.02.2019 um 17:18 schrieb Luca Olivetti via lazarus: I added a note to the wiki that both lclextensions and virtualtreeview are now included with lazarus. Which article? I want to have a look and check whether it is correct.

Re: [Lazarus] GIT sha1 vs svn numbers

2019-02-13 Thread Martin Frb via lazarus
This was meant to go to some one else. autocompletion of mail addresses -- ___ lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] GIT sha1 vs svn numbers

2019-02-13 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys via lazarus
On 13/02/2019 22:24, Martin Frb via lazarus wrote: > I looked at a few ideas, if something like the svn numbers could be > retained. Why would you want to shoehorn Git (a distributed version control system) into the way SubVersion (a client/server based version control system) works? They are

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus with fpc 3.2 [was Re: [fpc-devel] Suspicion about TThread.Synchronize]

2019-02-13 Thread Werner Pamler via lazarus
Am 13.02.2019 um 17:18 schrieb Luca Olivetti via lazarus: I added a note to the wiki that both lclextensions and virtualtreeview are now included with lazarus. Which article? I want to have a look and check whether it is correct. Because the situation is more complicated: In Laz trunk (or

[Lazarus] GIT sha1 vs svn numbers

2019-02-13 Thread Martin Frb via lazarus
I looked at a few ideas, if something like the svn numbers could be retained. One approach would be to have a tag on each commit. That would mean that r54123 would be a replacement for the sha1 in almost all (if not all)  situations. Not tested, but likely that the server can add the tags,

Re: [Lazarus] alternative to web programming?

2019-02-13 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, duilio foschi via lazarus wrote: https://www.cybelesoft.com/thinfinity/virtualui/ has somebody tried the product above? Can it be a real alternative to web programming? Not really. It's basically a remote desktop session in a browser. Some kind of terminal server

Re: [Lazarus] alternative to web programming?

2019-02-13 Thread Anthony Walter via lazarus
IMO the best things about creating and using html + css for web applications is the power of the design. That is, you can easily style the look of a web application to be practically anything, including dead simple animations and transforms. So then using a framework where you have to design the

Re: [Lazarus] alternative to web programming?

2019-02-13 Thread Fabio Luis Girardi via lazarus
Maybe it's something similar to gtk3 Broadway? Em Qua, 13 de fev de 2019 16:41, duilio foschi via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org escreveu: > https://www.cybelesoft.com/thinfinity/virtualui/ > > has somebody tried the product above? > > Can it be a real alternative to web programming? >

[Lazarus] alternative to web programming?

2019-02-13 Thread duilio foschi via lazarus
https://www.cybelesoft.com/thinfinity/virtualui/ has somebody tried the product above? Can it be a real alternative to web programming? Thank you Peppe Polpo -- ___ lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org

[Lazarus] Windows startup infinite loop

2019-02-13 Thread Henry Vermaak via lazarus
We're having a strange problem here, an infinite loop happens on a customer's machine just after the main form is created. It doesn't happen when the program is run inside a debugger and it only happens on the customer's machine(s), so it's probably related to their Windows configuration. The

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus with fpc 3.2 [was Re: [fpc-devel] Suspicion about TThread.Synchronize]

2019-02-13 Thread Luca Olivetti via lazarus
El 13/2/19 a les 17:10, Luca Olivetti via lazarus ha escrit: El 13/2/19 a les 16:18, Luca Olivetti via lazarus ha escrit: No, you must use the VirtualTreeViews which comes with Lazarus (folder components/virtualtreeview). If you absolutely want to stay with this github version you should

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus with fpc 3.2 [was Re: [fpc-devel] Suspicion about TThread.Synchronize]

2019-02-13 Thread Luca Olivetti via lazarus
El 13/2/19 a les 16:18, Luca Olivetti via lazarus ha escrit: No, you must use the VirtualTreeViews which comes with Lazarus (folder components/virtualtreeview). If you absolutely want to stay with this github version you should replace "var" in the offending methods by a "const".

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus with fpc 3.2 [was Re: [fpc-devel] Suspicion about TThread.Synchronize]

2019-02-13 Thread Luca Olivetti via lazarus
El 13/2/19 a les 14:17, Werner Pamler via lazarus ha escrit: Am 13.02.2019 um 12:08 schrieb Luca Olivetti via lazarus: El 13/2/19 a les 9:50, Werner Pamler via lazarus ha escrit: I checked out r60392 but I still cannot compile VirtualTreeView (checked out from github

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus with fpc 3.2 [was Re: [fpc-devel] Suspicion about TThread.Synchronize]

2019-02-13 Thread Martok via lazarus
Am 13.02.2019 um 14:17 schrieb Werner Pamler via lazarus: > No, you must use the VirtualTreeViews which comes with Lazarus (folder > components/virtualtreeview). Sorry to barge in here, but is this version actively maintained again? I distinctly remember from 2016 that it was extremely outdated

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus with fpc 3.2 [was Re: [fpc-devel] Suspicion about TThread.Synchronize]

2019-02-13 Thread Werner Pamler via lazarus
Am 13.02.2019 um 12:08 schrieb Luca Olivetti via lazarus: El 13/2/19 a les 9:50, Werner Pamler via lazarus ha escrit: I checked out r60392 but I still cannot compile VirtualTreeView (checked out from github https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus.git, branch lazarus-master)

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus with fpc 3.2 [was Re: [fpc-devel] Suspicion about TThread.Synchronize]

2019-02-13 Thread Luca Olivetti via lazarus
El 13/2/19 a les 9:50, Werner Pamler via lazarus ha escrit: Please update your Laz-fixes installation: The patch for the issue with VirtualTreeView has been merged to fixes in r60091, that for the issue with TAChart in r60392. I checked out r60392 but I still cannot compile VirtualTreeView

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus with fpc 3.2 [was Re: [fpc-devel] Suspicion about TThread.Synchronize]

2019-02-13 Thread Werner Pamler via lazarus
Please update your Laz-fixes installation: The patch for the issue with VirtualTreeView has been merged to fixes in r60091, that for the issue with TAChart in r60392. -- ___ lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus with fpc 3.2 [was Re: [fpc-devel] Suspicion about TThread.Synchronize]

2019-02-13 Thread Mattias Gaertner via lazarus
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:30:24 +0100 Luca Olivetti via lazarus wrote: > El 6/2/19 a les 19:19, Luca Olivetti ha escrit: > > [The original thread was in fpc-devel, but this is a lazarus issue I > think] > > > > El 6/2/19 a les 18:51, Sven Barth via fpc-devel ha escrit: > > > >> Would you

[Lazarus] Lazarus with fpc 3.2 [was Re: [fpc-devel] Suspicion about TThread.Synchronize]

2019-02-13 Thread Luca Olivetti via lazarus
El 6/2/19 a les 19:19, Luca Olivetti ha escrit: [The original thread was in fpc-devel, but this is a lazarus issue I think] El 6/2/19 a les 18:51, Sven Barth via fpc-devel ha escrit: Would you nevertheless try with 3.2, please? Just in case it happens to be the problem I had fixed in