On 03/29/2011 09:16 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
The reference guide is also available online, so that is no reason.
Sorry for erroneous language. Here with online I meant pressing F1
when a language error occurs or a language keyword is under the cursor.
-Michael
--
On 03/30/2011 12:24 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Is it safe to use DebugLn from thread other than main?
No.
(Me again, but I could not resist: )
I suppose It would be very easy to make a thread save version of DebugLn
if TApplication.QueueAsyncCall would be fixed in GTK (and all other
On 30/03/2011 01:05, cobines wrote:
OK, thanks both for answers. DbgOutThreadLog function seems useful,
but I need to write to console so I'll use DebugLn via Synchronize.
If you take a look at the tiOPF v2 available from SourceForge.net, it
has tiLog, tiLogToGUI, tiLogToConsole,
On 29/03/2011 21:15, Marco van de Voort wrote:
With MPL and LGPL you are officially obliged to donate fixes to the relevant
packages back.
Correct.
The (L)GPL with exception bit absolves you from that.
Where does it say that? By LGPL with exception, I gather you mean like
the license
It seems it is enough to protect the call to DebugLn with a critical section:
var
cs: syncobjs.TCriticalSection;
procedure DebugLnThreadSafe(const s: String);
begin
cs.Acquire;
try
DebugLn(s);
finally
cs.Release;
end;
end;
--
cobines
--
Am 30.03.2011 09:30, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 30.03.2011 09:01, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 03/29/2011 09:16 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
The reference guide is also available online, so that is no reason.
Sorry for erroneous language. Here with online I meant pressing F1
when a language error
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 30/03/2011 01:05, cobines wrote:
OK, thanks both for answers. DbgOutThreadLog function seems useful,
but I need to write to console so I'll use DebugLn via Synchronize.
If you take a look at the tiOPF v2 available from SourceForge.net, it
On 30/03/2011 09:43, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I would not recommend using it, because this component hijacks the
command-line options.
No it doesn't! Why do you say that?
Yes there is a convenience unit that automatically registers the various
log output targets (the unit is
On 03/30/2011 09:34 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
If you follow the link in the second mail after Graeme's (leading to
the wiki), you'll see that the second one (language keywords) is also
supported.
saying
This feature exists since 0.9.15 and requires the FPC sources installed
locally.
So
On 30/03/2011 09:30, Sven Barth wrote:
At least the first one works if the right documentation is installed.
See this mail from Graeme (including screenshot):
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/2011-February/060170.html
And the second option works by using fpGUI's DocView
On 03/30/2011 01:05 AM, cobines wrote:
I'll use DebugLn via Synchronize.
Synchronize is not a good option for DebugLn, as (1) you need to pass
parameters and (2) it will stall the thread for an unforeseeable amount
of time. Application.QueuAsyncCall has been provided for exactly that
Hi,
Would it be desirable to be able to specify one's own defaults for each
component (without subclassing), similar to defining your own favourite
properties?
Eg. each time I drop a TPanel, I change BevelOuter to bvNone and the Caption
to nothing. Doesn't seem that RAD. (TPanels really
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 30/03/2011 09:43, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I would not recommend using it, because this component hijacks the
command-line options.
No it doesn't! Why do you say that?
Because last time I checked, it was so. I even reported it to
On 03/30/2011 09:16 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:e.
If you take a look at the tiOPF v2 ...
Do you happen ton know how this makes sure that it works in a
thread-safe way ?
(With our Delphi projects we do thread safe logging via PostMessage,
but with Lazarus this is a moving target, depending
On 03/30/2011 09:28 AM, cobines wrote:
It seems it is enough to protect the call to DebugLn with a critical section:
IMHO, not a good idea at all, as DebugLn, being a debug feature is
supposed to be as non-intrusive as possible. And a critical section
might stall the thread for an
On 03/30/2011 09:58 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
And the second option works by using fpGUI's DocView and the INF help
files. Integration with Lazarus IDE is dead simple via the External
Tools dialog (no need to recompile the IDE). You can even integrate
Kylix 3's help with Lazarus IDE.
On 30/03/2011 10:06, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Admittedly, this is a long time ago. Maybe the implementation has been
changed in the meantime.
That must have been a good few years ago (I think back in tiOPF v1
days). I just double checked tiOPF v2. None of the tiLogXXX units do any
On 30/03/2011 10:05, Michael Schnell wrote:
Do you happen ton know how this makes sure that it works in a
thread-safe way ?
The details are in the Core/tiLog.pas unit, and is not too complicated.
You are welcome to take a look at that code.
I just encountered a nasty problem:
When I have multiple Lazarus installations (trunk, branches,
snapshot...), the common Lazarus configuration is used by default (when
no --pcp is specified). Actually I wondered about many error messages on
an IDE rebuild, until I noticed that the (default)
Would it be reasonable to expect make clean to delete the
svn2revisioninc binary, since this is only used during the build process?
I've just been reminded of this one when using a tarball containing the
stable Lazarus sources on various machines to get them up to date- as
soon as I moved
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
I just encountered a nasty problem:
When I have multiple Lazarus installations (trunk, branches, snapshot...),
the common Lazarus configuration is used by default (when no --pcp is
specified). Actually I wondered about many error messages on
2011/3/30 Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com:
Can somebody please clarify the intended procedure for configuring multiple
parallel Lazarus installations?
Always specify the primary config directory, if you have multiple
parallel Lazarus installations. You may add the --pcp parameter in
On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:19 michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Well, definitely not on Unix.
On unix, the EXE directory should never contain config files.
That depends. I think I'm not the only Lazarus user who has Lazarus
installed in his home directory; i.e. without make install.
On 30/03/2011 10:56, Andreas Schneider wrote:
On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:19 michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Well, definitely not on Unix.
On unix, the EXE directory should never contain config files.
That depends. I think I'm not the only Lazarus user who has Lazarus
installed in
Michael Schnell schrieb:
On 03/29/2011 09:16 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
The reference guide is also available online, so that is no reason.
Sorry for erroneous language. Here with online I meant pressing F1
when a language error occurs or a language keyword is under the cursor.
That's
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
On 30/03/2011 10:14, Michael Schnell wrote:
It would be GREAT if Lazarus would provide all this right out of the box
I've been saying this for years, but the Lazarus developers can't seem
to make a decision on a offline help format... so we are all stuck (by
Andreas Schneider wrote:
On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:19 michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Well, definitely not on Unix.
On unix, the EXE directory should never contain config files.
That depends. I think I'm not the only Lazarus user who has Lazarus
installed in his home directory;
On 03/30/2011 10:39 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I've been saying this for years, but the Lazarus developers can't seem
to make a decision on a offline help format...
If DocView really is good, stable and open source, I don't see why its
not integrated
so we are all stuck (by default)
On 30/03/2011 12:02, Martin wrote:
The problem is many users install a 2nd copy, but do not know
True.
My idea (but I havent got the time) would be:
- lazarus remembers it's own exe-path in the enviroments-options.xml
- if the exe path changes, lazarus gives a warning (can be switched
On 30/03/2011 12:13, Michael Schnell wrote:
If DocView really is good, stable and open source, I don't see why its
not integrated
Because DocView is a part of the fpGUI Toolkit project, and probably
because MacOSX is not officially supported by fpGUI yet. And yes,
docview is open-source, its
On 30/03/2011 13:02, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
FPDoc Editor is fine, and it allows to update the help immediately. Even
no need to press F1, to get instant help on the identifier under the caret.
You cannot compare, because FPDoc Editor is only good for editing API
help (in fpdoc format).
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:08:14AM -0300, fluisgira...@gmail.com wrote:
And this version works on Windows and Linux, 32 and 64 bits. Maybe I'm
wrong, but the version of the PascalScript on Lazarus CCR don't work with 64
bits systems and the scriptengine2 don't work with linux. So, if you want
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
The (L)GPL with exception bit absolves you from that.
Where does it say that? By LGPL with exception, I gather you mean like
the license used by FPC? It that case, there is only a static linking
exception. You are still
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:01:34AM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 03/29/2011 09:16 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
The reference guide is also available online, so that is no reason.
Sorry for erroneous language. Here with online I meant pressing F1
when a language error occurs or a language
Thanks!
In fact I didn't find the sources earlier from RemObjects page.
Now I found them and updated the wiki page accordingly.
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Pascal_Script
PascalScript installed nicely now. The cross-platform porting has received
lots of work. It has assembly code written
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Juha (gmail) wrote:
Thanks!
In fact I didn't find the sources earlier from RemObjects page.
Now I found them and updated the wiki page accordingly.
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Pascal_Script
PascalScript installed nicely now. The cross-platform porting has
michael.vancann...@wisa.be kirjoitti keskiviikko, 30. maaliskuuta 2011
14:04:20:
It is needed to call native functions from within the scripting language.
Ok, it can do more than I first thought. I must learn more of this.
Juha
--
___
Lazarus
On 03/30/2011 12:59 PM, Juha (gmail) wrote:
I still don't understand why such program needs assembly at all.
This will just a few lines as wrappers for calling binary functions. I
suppose it should be not much work to enhance the code for additional
targets for someone who in fact needs it and
Juha (gmail) kirjoitti keskiviikko, 30. maaliskuuta 2011 13:59:26:
It has assembly code written for x86, x64 and ARM.
That means it is still not completely cross-platform. FPC supports more
processors than those 3.
Actually it supports also PowerPC. That makes 4 processors. Still better.
Juha
On 30/03/11 12:44, Juha (gmail) wrote:
Juha (gmail) kirjoitti keskiviikko, 30. maaliskuuta 2011 13:59:26:
It has assembly code written for x86, x64 and ARM.
That means it is still not completely cross-platform. FPC supports more
processors than those 3.
Actually it supports also PowerPC. That
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:37:06AM +0200, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Can somebody please clarify the intended procedure for configuring multiple
parallel Lazarus installations?
Always specify the primary config directory, if you have multiple
parallel Lazarus installations. You may add the
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nlwrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
The (L)GPL with exception bit absolves you from that.
Where does it say that? By LGPL with exception, I gather you mean like
the license used by
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com
wrote:
I just encountered a nasty problem:
When I have multiple Lazarus installations (trunk, branches, snapshot...),
the common Lazarus configuration is used by default (when no --pcp is
specified). Actually I
Hi
I changed the shortcut for Toggle Comment into Ctrl+T.
I also added some more shortcuts.
Shortcut for ecToggleComment was defined as: Ctrl+VK_OEM_2.
It was displayed in menu caption as garbage.
And:
VK_OEM_2 = $BF;
// Used for miscellaneous characters; it can vary by keyboard.
// For the
Juha (gmail) kirjoitti keskiviikko, 30. maaliskuuta 2011 15:46:36:
I changed the shortcut for Toggle Comment into Ctrl+T.
Sorry, I meant Ctrl+Shift+T.
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
2011/3/30 Juha (gmail) juha.mannine...@gmail.com:
Hi
I changed the shortcut for Toggle Comment into Ctrl+T.
I also added some more shortcuts.
Shortcut for ecToggleComment was defined as: Ctrl+VK_OEM_2.
It was displayed in menu caption as garbage.
And:
VK_OEM_2 = $BF;
// Used for
Zaher Dirkey parm...@gmail.com hat am 30. März 2011 um 14:26 geschrieben:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com
[mailto:drdiettri...@aol.com] wrote:
I just encountered a nasty problem:
When I have multiple Lazarus installations (trunk,
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
IMO the IDE should look for a configuration in the current (EXE)
directory first, and only into the common directory when no config can
be found there.
Well, definitely not on Unix. On unix, the EXE directory should never
contain config files.
I dare to
On 30/03/2011 12:16, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
IMO the IDE should look for a configuration in the current (EXE)
directory first, and only into the common directory when no config
can be found there.
Well, definitely not on Unix. On unix, the EXE
On 30/03/2011 14:23, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Zaher Dirkey parm...@gmail.com hat am 30. März 2011 um 14:26
geschrieben:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com mailto:drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
I just encountered a nasty problem:
When I have
Vincent Snijders kirjoitti keskiviikko, 30. maaliskuuta 2011 16:16:31:
Is ctrl + / still the default alternative shortcut?
Yes.
The benefit having it as an alternative (number 2 choice) is that the first
shortcut is shown in menu caption properly.
VK_OEM_2 was showing as garbage.
Juha
--
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
IMO the IDE should look for a configuration in the current (EXE) directory
first, and only into the common directory when no config can be found
there.
Well, definitely not on Unix. On unix, the EXE
Just tried on the mac mini. The demo runs up to 1000FPS which is the limit of
what I can measure. How nice to have hardware acceleration
One more thing tho, there seem to be a some bugs with key handling.
1) OnKeyPress, OnKeyDown and OnKeyUp are not fired for TOpenGLControl on win32
but
2011/3/30 Juha (gmail) juha.mannine...@gmail.com:
Vincent Snijders kirjoitti keskiviikko, 30. maaliskuuta 2011 16:16:31:
Is ctrl + / still the default alternative shortcut?
Yes.
The benefit having it as an alternative (number 2 choice) is that the first
shortcut is shown in menu caption
On 30/03/2011 14:49, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Don't try to force Windows habits on Unix users.
Beware!
It's more a single user versus multi user mindset. And it is a memory
optimization, by having the same executable on disk, and in memory, for
multiple users.
It has also the
Maybe Lazarus should simply come with a sh script and a batch script,
which would do:
./startlazarus --pcp=./config
and
startlazarus.exe --pcp=config
They could be called: singleuserlazarus.sh and singleuserlazarus.bat
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com hat am 30. März
2011 um 16:20 geschrieben:
Maybe Lazarus should simply come with a sh script and a batch script,
which would do:
./startlazarus --pcp=./config
and
startlazarus.exe --pcp=config
They could be called:
2011/3/30 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de:
It's not only for single user.
Maybe better localconfiglazarus?
Indeed, that's a better name.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 30/03/2011 13:56, Juha (gmail) wrote:
Juha (gmail) kirjoitti keskiviikko, 30. maaliskuuta 2011 15:46:36:
I changed the shortcut for Toggle Comment into Ctrl+T.
Sorry, I meant Ctrl+Shift+T.
Isn't that used by insert todo ?
--
___
Lazarus mailing
Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com hat am 30. März 2011 um 17:29
geschrieben:
[...]
What's the purpose of specifying a Lazarus directory, other than the one
with the IDE?
I guess, with 'IDE' you mean the lazarus executable.
This executable may be in the config directory, when the
Martin kirjoitti keskiviikko, 30. maaliskuuta 2011 17:46:22:
Sorry, I meant Ctrl+Shift+T.
Isn't that used by insert todo ?
Damn right! The shortcut space is getting crowded.
I am about to change it to Ctrl+Shift+W which is not used in the default
mapping.
Juha
--
I checked linux, and there the OnKeyXX also works correct. So this seems to be
a win32 specific thing.
Darius
On Mar 30, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
Just tried on the mac mini. The demo runs up to 1000FPS which is the limit of
what I can measure. How nice to have hardware
michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
IMO the IDE should look for a configuration in the current (EXE)
directory first, and only into the common directory when no config
can be found there.
Well, definitely
Hi all,
how do I link against dynamic libraries in linux? Currently I rewrite
the linker script
INPUT(
-ldl
-lpthread
-lX11
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0
-lgtk-x11-2.0
-lgdk-x11-2.0
-lgobject-2.0
-lglib-2.0
-lgthread-2.0
-lgmodule-2.0
-lpango-1.0
-latk-1.0
-lcairo
)
section by
INPUT(
-ldl
-lpthread
-lX11
I installed Lazarus 0,9,30 in Debian 6, but when trying to install the
Lazreport the following error knocks me down:
/usr/lib/lazarus/0.9.30/ide/lazconf.pp(1,1) Fatal: Can't find unit
DefineTemplates used by LazConf
As I could solve this, because I am jammed?
Regards
=
|| ISMAEL ||
Do you mean the default linker script doesn't work? Those -lxxx would be
linked against libxxx.so, so make sure you have them in PATH (usually
/usr/lib). Just create .so symlinks to those .so.0s
--
View this message in context:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:17:36PM +0100, Paulo Costa wrote:
It's more a single user versus multi user mindset. And it is a memory
optimization, by having the same executable on disk, and in memory, for
multiple users.
It has also the downside that, for it to be effective, it forces all the
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:02:11 +0200
Paul van Helden p...@planetgis.co.za wrote:
Hi,
Would it be desirable to be able to specify one's own defaults for each
component (without subclassing), similar to defining your own favourite
properties?
Yes.
[...]
Mattias
--
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:02:04 +0100
Martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 30/03/2011 10:56, Andreas Schneider wrote:
[...]
The problem is many users install a 2nd copy, but do not know
My idea (but I havent got the time) would be:
- lazarus remembers it's own exe-path in the
Martin schrieb:
But that is only where to search:
- That is: IF there was a config in the local director, then yes maybe
it would be good to use this local config
That's what I want.
- Except: people who had lazarus for a long time, and kept upgrading,
may still have an old 0.9.24 config
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
IMO the IDE should look for a configuration in the current (EXE)
directory first, and only into the common directory when no config
can be found there.
Well,
Paulo Costa schrieb:
On 30/03/2011 14:49, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Don't try to force Windows habits on Unix users.
Beware!
It's more a single user versus multi user mindset.
Right, and Lazarus is in what category???
In a multi-user environment (company network) an administrator
On Tuesday 29 March 2011 02:07:56 lyh1 wrote:
;-)
It is painful to use a 4 inch device for development, but it is fun to see.
I will do some more research later on, and see how Qt apps work on
android phone.
Running Lazarus on a Maemo (N900) device (4)
is not really usable because all
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:52:57 +0200
Darius Blaszyk dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
[...]
2) OnKeyDown and OnKeyUp for TForm always give an uppercase value for the key,
The Key parameter is the virtual key code.
only OnKeyPress gives the correct character (lower or uppercase) for win32.
On
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:28:50 -0400
Ismael L. Donis García ism...@citricos.co.cu wrote:
I installed Lazarus 0,9,30 in Debian 6, but when trying to install the
Lazreport the following error knocks me down:
/usr/lib/lazarus/0.9.30/ide/lazconf.pp(1,1) Fatal: Can't find unit
DefineTemplates
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:45:54 +0200
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
ZeelandNet Webmail
Hi,
Here's a nice demo which I reworked to
FPC/Lazarus of an IMGUI implementation. An IMGUI is a different approach
to implementing a widget toolkit and may be of interest in some
applications.
On Mar 30, 2011, at 8:26 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:52:57 +0200
Darius Blaszyk dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
[...]
2) OnKeyDown and OnKeyUp for TForm always give an uppercase value for the
key,
The Key parameter is the virtual key code.
only OnKeyPress
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
IMO the IDE should look for a configuration in the current (EXE)
directory first, and only into the common directory
- Original Message -
From: Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de
To: lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Error to reconstruct ide version 0.9.30 in Debian 6
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:28:50 -0400
Ismael L. Donis García
You all repeat another discuses, while the end user like me, still have
problem to share him config espicialy for IDE.
The real question, without using command line how to share config file
between Windows and Linux at the same computer, (export/import it is bad
idea).
Let me point where is my
I found many of {$IFDEF SYN_LAZARUS} in SynEdit, my ask is SynEdit used
outside Lazarus (like Delphi for example)?
Thanks in advance.
--
Zaher Dirkey
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
You all repeat another discuses, while the end user like me, still have problem
to share him config espicialy for IDE.
The real question, without using command line how to share config file between
Windows and Linux at the same computer,
On 30/03/2011 22:47, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
I found many of {$IFDEF SYN_LAZARUS} in SynEdit, my ask is SynEdit
used outside Lazarus (like Delphi for example)?
they are a relict from another time
They were once meant to mark all places were SynEdit in Lazarus changed
from the original
On 29/3/2011 09:15, Paul Ishenin wrote:
29.03.2011 20:08, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
Hi List.
After updating to latest trunk version of Lazarus i've experience
something quite strange.
I'm using: Lazarus 0.9.31 r30067M FPC 2.4.2 x86_64-linux-gtk 2
I've created a link to a gif that
Hi,
Is there any (more or less) reliable way to detect the size of the
desktop (that is: on the active screen, the space a form can occupy so
that it will take in account the presence of a taskbar etc.)
I need something like this to keep a form that I create at runtime in
view on the desktop
On 29/3/2011 13:42, Liyuan García Caballero wrote:
On Kubuntu 10.04 x86_32 with lazarus 0.9.30 and fpc 2.4.2:
/usr/lib/lazarus/0.9.30/components/luicontrols/togglelabel.pas(65,15)
Error: There is no method in an ancestor class to be overridden:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 30/03/2011 22:47, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
I found many of {$IFDEF SYN_LAZARUS} in SynEdit, my ask is SynEdit used
outside Lazarus (like Delphi for example)?
they are a relict from another time
They were once meant to
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
You all repeat another discuses, while the end user like me, still have
problem to share him config espicialy for IDE.
The real question, without using command
Before install Sqlite.lpk on component folder lazarus work fine, but
since i have installed sqlite.lpk lazarus got an error, sqlite.dll not
found..
does any body have ever found this error ?
Rgds,
Dians
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 31/03/2011 00:31, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Martin laza...@mfriebe.de
mailto:laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 30/03/2011 22:47, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
I found many of {$IFDEF SYN_LAZARUS} in SynEdit, my ask is
SynEdit used outside Lazarus (like
2011/3/31 Martin laza...@mfriebe.de
On 31/03/2011 00:31, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 30/03/2011 22:47, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
I found many of {$IFDEF SYN_LAZARUS} in SynEdit, my ask is SynEdit used
outside Lazarus (like Delphi
On 3/30/2011 08:18, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
The (L)GPL with exception bit absolves you from that.
Where does it say that? By LGPL
On 3/30/2011 09:49, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
I dare to disagree. A SVN checkout is writeable, and this is where the EXE is
stored, along with the related source files. Consequently the config should be
stored there as well.
No, no
Well you should have sqlite libraries installed (either put in lazarus folder
or wherever in PATH) since the IDE needs it to manipulate database at design
time.
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Sqlite-dll-tp2756499p2756924.html
Sent from
does sqlite.dll already on windows or should download before ? i
search on C:\ got sqlite.dll on folder adobe or any other folder not
on windows folder, i have put it on lazarus folder and show any error
sqlite_change
On 3/31/11, leledumbo leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id wrote:
Well you should have
2011/3/31 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara luiz...@oi.com.br:
On 29/3/2011 13:42, Liyuan García Caballero wrote:
On Kubuntu 10.04 x86_32 with lazarus 0.9.30 and fpc 2.4.2:
/usr/lib/lazarus/0.9.30/components/luicontrols/togglelabel.pas(65,15)
Error: There is no method in an ancestor class to be
2011/3/31 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara luiz...@oi.com.br:
Please report bugs in http://code.google.com/p/luipack/issues/list
Added to http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lui_Controls#Bugs
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
97 matches
Mail list logo
