Wow, is that what I really sound like? tl;dr,ldo
What I meant to say was:
I am developing a Delphi+Lazarus TCollection descendant that needs a fancy
designer window. What is the best approach to get one's Designer into both
IDE's?
Thanks, and sorry for so many words.
-gmt
- Original
I use neither Ubuntu nor Gnome nor Unity, but I'm curious:
1 Are other applications broken too?
2 Using LCL-Qt the problems appear too?
3 Using LCL-fpgui (but obviously not in the IDE) the problems appear too?
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
___
Gregory M. Turner g...@malth.us hat am 19. Oktober 2011 um 08:10
geschrieben:
Wow, is that what I really sound like? tl;dr,ldo
What I meant to say was:
I am developing a Delphi+Lazarus TCollection descendant that needs a fancy
designer window. What is the best approach to get one's
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Henry Vermaak henry.verm...@gmail.com wrote:
That's good news, thanks!
Hello, Could you test the very latest Pascal Widestring Manager? Just
disable cwstring and then add paswstring as the first unit in your
projects uses clause.
The Pascal Widestring Manager is
- Original Message -
Gregory M. Turner g...@malth.us hat am 19. Oktober 2011 um 08:10
geschrieben:
Wow, is that what I really sound like? tl;dr,ldo
What I meant to say was:
I am developing a Delphi+Lazarus TCollection descendant that needs
a fancy designer window. What is
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:31:20PM +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Ok, I changed the define in rev 32655.
But you should note that when paswstring gets finished it will phase
out cwstrings.
Not that I know. And btw, I also use arm-linux without android, so please
keep that target
Can somebody explain the purpose of e.g. WindowProc, WndProc and
MainWndProc, in the LCL?
What's the purpose of TWinControl.MainWndProc, when it's never called or
used otherwise, does nothing, and is not virtual?
In Delphi MainWndProc calls the handler assigned to WindowProc, enclosed
in
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
Not that I know. And btw, I also use arm-linux without android, so please
keep that target intact and aligned with normal linux ports.
What is the difference between using cwstring and paswstring? Any
reason for not
On Wednesday 19 October 2011 13.14:50 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl
wrote:
Not that I know. And btw, I also use arm-linux without android, so please
keep that target intact and aligned with normal linux ports.
What
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
Can somebody explain the purpose of e.g. WindowProc, WndProc and
MainWndProc, in the LCL?
Delphi compatibility. AFAIK WndProc works for messages = WM_USER
In Delphi MainWndProc calls the handler assigned to
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:31:20PM +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Ok, I changed the define in rev 32655.
But you should note that when paswstring gets finished it will phase
out cwstrings.
Not that I know. And btw, I also use arm-linux without android,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Martin Schreiber mse00...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is paswstring?
http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/components/lazutils/paswstring.pas?view=markuproot=lazarus
It uses lazutf8 (which includes most importantly UTF16ToUTF8 and
viceversa and
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
Can somebody explain the purpose of e.g. WindowProc, WndProc and
MainWndProc, in the LCL?
Delphi compatibility. AFAIK WndProc works for messages = WM_USER
WndProc can
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
WndProc can preprocess *any* kind of messages, which must be handled in a
non-standard way in a specific control, e.g. the TripleClick messages.
WndProc finally calls Dispatch, to invoke the implemented message
2011/10/19 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
WndProc can preprocess *any* kind of messages, which must be handled in a
non-standard way in a specific control, e.g. the TripleClick
Am 19.10.2011 14:08, schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:31:20PM +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
wrote:
Ok, I changed the define in rev 32655.
But you should note that when paswstring gets finished it will phase
out cwstrings.
Not that I
Hi, I'm trying to compile Trunk with fpc 2.7.1 (also from trunk), and I'm
getting this while trying to do a make clean all:
lconvencoding.pas(6123,8) Hint: Conversion between ordinals and pointers is not
portable
lconvencoding.pas(6163,8) Hint: Conversion between ordinals and pointersis not
On 2011-10-19 11:13:13 -0300, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to compile Trunk with fpc 2.7.1 (also from trunk), and I'm
getting this while trying to do a make clean all:
lconvencoding.pas(6123,8) Hint: Conversion between ordinals and pointers is
not portable
Does it compile with rev 32982 (latest svn)?
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 2011-10-19 16:44:50 +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Does it compile with rev 32982 (latest svn)?
Yes, thanks!.
--
Leonardo M. Ramé
http://leonardorame.blogspot.com
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
What I was against, is letting all windows messages bubble up from the
win32 widgetset interface into the LCL. I am more a proponent of only
passing those messages to the LCL what are handled by the LCL, not all
and very messages that the win32 widget generate.
IMO
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
I also don't understand the parallel or different WM..., LM..., CM... and
CN... message IDs. Is that separation related to messages handled (or not
handled) by widgets or by the LCL? Or have the LM... message IDs been added
only to prevent cyclic unit
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 01:14:50PM +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
Not that I know. And btw, I also use arm-linux without android, so please
keep that target intact and aligned with normal linux ports.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
Moreover you are stating something as a fact here that was not discussed at
all.
I am confused by your statements, the discussion here is about the
usage of cwstring in the LCL, then I said that I want to replace
2011/10/19 Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com:
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
What I was against, is letting all windows messages bubble up from the
win32 widgetset interface into the LCL. I am more a proponent of only
passing those messages to the LCL what are handled by the LCL, not all
On Wednesday 19 October 2011 18.59:06 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
Moreover you are stating something as a fact here that was not discussed
at all.
I am confused by your statements, the discussion here is
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:59:06PM +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I am confused by your statements, the discussion here is about the
usage of cwstring in the LCL, then I said that I want to replace
cwstring with paswstring in the LCL (after making sure it is
completely equivalent).
2011/10/19 Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:59:06PM +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I am confused by your statements, the discussion here is about the
usage of cwstring in the LCL, then I said that I want to replace
cwstring with paswstring in the LCL
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Martin Schreiber mse00...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it use locale specific collation in PasUnicodeCompareStr and
PasUnicodeCompareText?
Good point, no, not yet. But this affects only turkish, azeri and
lithuanian AFAIK
Adding turkish and azeri is trivial, because
On 10/19/11, Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess Felipe gave up waiting on a Unicode RTL for the time being and
goes for a full UTF8 pseudo RTL in LazUtils.
Well, after a lot of discussion I got convinced that Lazarus should
give a try at the UTF-8 mode of the RTL when
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 10/19/11, Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess Felipe gave up waiting on a Unicode RTL for the time being and
goes for a full UTF8 pseudo RTL in LazUtils.
Well, after a lot of discussion I got convinced that
2011/10/19 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 10/19/11, Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess Felipe gave up waiting on a Unicode RTL for the time being and
goes for a full UTF8 pseudo RTL in LazUtils.
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
What I was against, is letting all windows messages bubble up from the
win32 widgetset interface into the LCL. I am more a proponent of only
passing those messages to the LCL what are handled by the LCL, not all
and very messages that the win32 widget generate.
IMO
Hello,
On 2011-10-19 21:03, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Martin Schreibermse00...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it use locale specific collation in PasUnicodeCompareStr and
PasUnicodeCompareText?
Good point, no, not yet. But this affects only turkish, azeri and
Hello,
2011/10/19 Žilvinas Ledas zilvinas.le...@dict.lt:
I am native Lithuanian so I think can help at least providing info, but I
must understand what is the problem first.
I am mostly interested in LowerCase / UpperCase. Could you explain how
it works in Lithuanian and provide test cases for
35 matches
Mail list logo
