I have a unit (sarala_text.pas) which is part of a package (sarala_tools) that
uses the LCLProc unit.
My package file lists LCLBase as a requirement
I am able to compile the package from the package viewer
I can ctrl+click on the unit name LCLProc and it takes me there
I can ctrl+click on proc
> From the CodeRage 6 videos all I could see is that they now
differentiate between VCL (eg: vcl.forms.pas) and FireMonkey (eg:
fm.forms.pas) units.
Too bad... now they will face problems when refactoring the framework,
possibly causing users to create ifdefs in uses clause. I don't really know
> I cannot confirm that, seeing no such option in the IDE.
Well, do you have it installed? Or at least have you read
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/KOL-CE this ?
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Support-for-dotted-unit-name-tp3476470
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
wrote:
Lazarus only supports one GUI: LCL.
False, KOL-CE works in Lazarus too.
I cannot confirm that, seeing no such option in the IDE.
The new strings also are an FPC issue, which may require a diff
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
wrote:
> Lazarus only supports one GUI: LCL.
False, KOL-CE works in Lazarus too.
> The new strings also are an FPC issue, which may require a different LCL.
Based on what you say that? I fixed trunk usage with FPC 2.7 today
with trivial chang
Sven Barth schrieb:
Am 04.11.2011 13:08, schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
Sven Barth schrieb:
I don't think that Embarcadero considers dotted unit names as a relict
as they've improved the concept with a "default namespace" in XE2 (I
don't know whether I personally consider that as a improvement
I checked my Lazarus options and I had auto-rename and rename stuff in
general disabled. I always use camel hump format for unit names.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo
On 04/11/2011 14:21, Andrew Brunner wrote:
Updated to todays Lazarus from svn/trunk and started work... Only to
have my entire project build folder nuked by DoOpenEditorFile fixing
case routine...
/Developer/Source/Linux/64 was transformed into a binary file and
wiped out all sub folders. I had
Updated to todays Lazarus from svn/trunk and started work... Only to
have my entire project build folder nuked by DoOpenEditorFile fixing
case routine...
/Developer/Source/Linux/64 was transformed into a binary file and
wiped out all sub folders. I had to rm 64 and restore :-(
Ubuntu 11.10 x64
"Christian-W. Budde" hat am 4. November 2011 um
13:04 geschrieben:
> Hello,
>
> > This is the explanation for using unitname.identifier, which worked
> > since many years.
> >
> > Dotted unit name means dots in the unit name itself. For example
> > an.example.pas. I don't know a good example
At 2011-11-04 14:56:33,zeljko wrote:
> No, I think it's gtk2 version related, someone already reported problems with
> 2.24.7, and when downgraded to 2.24.6 it was ok.
> zeljko
Agree with you.
Checked again with 0.9.30.2rc2, check out from svn, no any modification
build command:
make dist
At 2011-11-04 12:06:39,cobines wrote:
>Maybe the same as this:
>
>http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/2011-November/068378.html
>
>Did you update GTK2 library recently?
I use archlinux, and update twice a week by pacman -Syu, So I use the newest
GTK version 2.24.7.
>
>--
>cob
On Friday 04 of November 2011 13:08:51 Martin wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 12:02, zeljko wrote:
> > On Friday 04 of November 2011 10:42:31 Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
> > > Hi List.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The auto completion feature (Ctrl+space, and possible others) does not
> > >
> > > seem t
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
wrote:
> Well, so what's the role of "Delphi" at all? What remains is an IDE and a
> compiler, with various GUI extensions.
Lazarus is already usable with 3rd party libraries, like KOL-CE works.
It also has non-GUI extensions, like fcl-web. Tha
The changes are reverted in r33296. I will see later what happened
there. Please test.
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Am 04.11.2011 13:08, schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
Sven Barth schrieb:
I don't think that Embarcadero considers dotted unit names as a relict
as they've improved the concept with a "default namespace" in XE2 (I
don't know whether I personally consider that as a improvement though
^^) and also i
Am 04.11.2011 13:04, schrieb Christian-W. Budde:
I have never used .NET, nor am I a Delphi fan-boy, but I think this
scoping is useful and I hope it will be supported by FPC. It is
discussable, whether it shall be used in Lazarus, but it should be
supported.
In 2.7.1 this is already supported,
On 2011-11-04 13:02, zeljko wrote:
On Friday 04 of November 2011 10:42:31 Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> The auto completion feature (Ctrl+space, and possible others) does not
> seem to work in trunk after rev. 33274.
Current workaround:
Goto Options->KeyMappings->Click
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
wrote:
> There exist more relicts from .NET, like Unicode names for identifiers.
Unlike dots in unit names, this feature is useful for people in a
general way, not just for .Net / Java compatibility. Pretty much every
programmer which isnt flu
Hello,
> This is the explanation for using unitname.identifier, which worked
> since many years.
>
> Dotted unit name means dots in the unit name itself. For example
> an.example.pas. I don't know a good example.
For me, this makes perfect sense, because of many reasons. Here are a
couple.
I wor
Sven Barth schrieb:
I don't think that Embarcadero considers dotted unit names as a relict
as they've improved the concept with a "default namespace" in XE2 (I
don't know whether I personally consider that as a improvement though
^^) and also introduced dotted names for all RTL, VCL and FireMo
On 04/11/2011 12:02, zeljko wrote:
On Friday 04 of November 2011 10:42:31 Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> The auto completion feature (Ctrl+space, and possible others) does not
> seem to work in trunk after rev. 33274.
Current workaround:
Goto Options->KeyMappings->Click
On Friday 04 of November 2011 10:42:31 Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> The auto completion feature (Ctrl+space, and possible others) does not
> seem to work in trunk after rev. 33274.
Current workaround:
Goto Options->KeyMappings->Click LoadScheme -> Choose Lazarus and press ok.
On 11/4/11 3:17 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Dotted unit name means dots in the unit name itself. For example
> an.example.pas. I don't know a good example.
Well, if unit names are tied to file names and embedded dots are
becoming more common in file names, then I can understand the "pressure"
to
Am 04.11.2011 11:15, schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich:
William Oliveira Ferreira schrieb:
Sorry about my low knowlegde, maybe i am the most slow-learning mailer
of this list but i don't understand the advantage of using dots on
unit name. Could someon explain it to me?
It's not an advantage, only
Am 04.11.2011 11:42, schrieb William Oliveira Ferreira:
Wait, now i´ve better understand. FPC Team already added this feature to
compiler, ok, but, add it just to be delphi XE2 compatible?
Dotted unit names were already introduced by at least Delphi 2005 (some
sources even report Delphi 7) - N
Wait, now i´ve better understand. FPC Team already added this feature to
compiler, ok, but, add it just to be delphi XE2 compatible?
William de Oliveira Ferreira
Bacharel em Sistemas de Informação
2011/11/4 Graeme Geldenhuys
> On 4 November 2011 10:08, wrote:
William Oliveira Ferreira schrieb:
Sorry about my low knowlegde, maybe i am the most slow-learning mailer
of this list but i don't understand the advantage of using dots on
unit name. Could someon explain it to me?
It's not an advantage, only a relict from the (never finished) .NET
experiment.
On 4 November 2011 10:08, wrote:
> Weep, then, because as of Delphi XE2, they started using it a lot.
From the CodeRage 6 videos all I could see is that they now
differentiate between VCL (eg: vcl.forms.pas) and FireMonkey (eg:
fm.forms.pas) units. I don't have a copy of XE2, but other than to
On Friday 04 of November 2011 10:42:31 Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> The auto completion feature (Ctrl+space, and possible others) does not
> seem to work in trunk after rev. 33274.
>
> Should I report this as a bug?
No it will be fixed ASAP, it's introduced by Juha when rewor
Hi List.
The auto completion feature (Ctrl+space, and possible others) does not
seem to work in trunk after rev. 33274.
Should I report this as a bug?
Kind regards,
Torsten Bonde Christiansen.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freep
2011/11/4 tcoq :
> Hello silvio,
> 1.5E+000 is exactly 1.5, from a numerical point of view. It seems
> that you are getting what you need: storing a real.
> Why would you want to have the "1.5" string? What is the issue?
> Thierry
For transporting data to a database from a mobile, via WAP
On 2011-11-04 10:08, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 4 November 2011 09:17, Mattias Gaertner
wrote:
This is the explanation for using unitname.identifier, which worked
since many years.
I was just about to say the same thing.
Dotted u
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 4 November 2011 09:17, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
This is the explanation for using unitname.identifier, which worked
since many years.
I was just about to say the same thing.
Dotted unit name means dots in the unit name itself. For example
a
On 4 November 2011 09:17, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> This is the explanation for using unitname.identifier, which worked
> since many years.
I was just about to say the same thing.
> Dotted unit name means dots in the unit name itself. For example
> an.example.pas. I don't know a good example.
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:46:01 -0400
Rich Saunders wrote:
> On 11/3/11 7:03 PM, William Oliveira Ferreira wrote:
> > Sorry about my low knowlegde, maybe i am the most slow-learning mailer
> > of this list but i don't understand the advantage of using dots on
> > unit name. Could someon explain it t
36 matches
Mail list logo
