At 06:34 PM 2/11/2005, you wrote:
Remove the {$R *.LFM) line completely.
Figured that out a minute ago by looking at a new blank
project, so I made the project file look like the new
project.
Added:
{$mode objfpc}{$H+} in both the project file and Unit 1
initialization
{$I unit111.lrs}
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 19:01:38 +1100
John Samperi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
LazarusResources.Add;('TForm1','FORMDATA',[ etc...
unit1.lrs (3,1) Error identifier not found LazarusResources
Add LResources to uses clause.
Mattias
Please note that this is the troublesome line
LazarusResources.Add;('TForm1','FORMDATA',[ etc...
note semicolon *
I manually fixed the line and it all built.
Then I renamed the file and did a build all
Now the line is generated correctly, no semicolon.
Well I'm up to the next stage now, trying to convert my
pride and joy to Lazarus.
Apart from Cport not being there yet it is complaining about
Rich Edit. Did a quick search of Lazarus but did not come
up with anything. May try and just use Edit as my requirements
are not complicated.
I think
Lazarus resources and windows resources are quite different, the
application icon is automatically loaded by windows if you use a
resource file, you may look at lazarus's source and rc file or at this
project
Below a hard copy of the screen with the messages I receive when I try to
install the 2 packages that are needed for installation of Lazaris 0.9.10.
Translated to english the seems like:
1:fpc warning: The user mattias doesn't exist - using root
warning: group mattias doesn't exist - using root
Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote:
Lazarus resources and windows resources are quite different, the
application icon is automatically loaded by windows if you use a
resource file, you may look at lazarus's source and rc file or at this
Thanks,
Lazarus refuses to link if I feed it with the same .res
Wise boy! Do you think that I didn't see if the packages are installed before
post the message here?
I never would spend the time of this mailing list if the installation was
successful.
The trouble, then, remains...
[ ]
Ricardo
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:49:53 -0200, Felipe Monteiro de
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:34:26 -0200
Wise boy! Do you think that I didn't see if the packages are installed before
post the message here?
I never would spend the time of this mailing list if the installation was
successful.
The trouble, then, remains...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# rpm
Two new questions:
How do I report a bug?
How can I solve my problem?
[ ]
Ricardo
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:36:30 +0100, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escreveu:
De: Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:36:30 +0100
Para: lazarus@miraclec.com
Assunto: Re:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:50:47 -0200
Two new questions:
How do I report a bug?
Use the bug tracker on the website.
How can I solve my problem?
Install the xxx.i386.rpm instead of the xxx.src.rpm.
Mattias
_
To
Thank you for your lesson. But I obtain the packages names in the list of
dependencies that appears when I try to install de Lazarus 0.9.10 package.(If I
can't trust in the linux messages in what kind of thinks I must get correct
package names?)
As you can see in the msg sent by mr. Mathias
Thank you! I'll try this!
[ ]
Ricardo
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:00:41 +0100, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escreveu:
De: Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:00:41 +0100
Para: lazarus@miraclec.com
Assunto: Re: [lazarus] Re: Errors during installation of FPC
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 17:17:08 -0200
Thank you for your lesson. But I obtain the packages names in the list of
dependencies that appears when I try to install de Lazarus 0.9.10 package.(If
I can't trust in the linux messages in what kind of thinks I must get correct
package names?)
As you
Maxim Ganetsky wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
пиÑеÑ: Reupdate, you updated between two commits of
me :) Yes it works again. Only make install
seems to give still problems. You can use "svn export"
as a workaround. It is ugly but works.I think the above is the best
hint because some
I install the #8220;fpc i386#8221; packages as suggested by mr. Mattias and
Lord Satan. Then I installed #8220;desktop-file-utils#8221; package.
I make a test with de package of Lazarus 0.9.10 and it points to the
gtk+-devel.
When I test the dependencies of the gtk+-devel i receive:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 18:39:57 -0200
I install the #8220;fpc i386#8221; packages as suggested by mr. Mattias and
Lord Satan. Then I installed #8220;desktop-file-utils#8221; package.
I make a test with de package of Lazarus 0.9.10 and it points to the
gtk+-devel.
When I test the dependencies
Glib-devel ist he suse name for it i think and it is avalible from ftp
server on my single 9.3 dvd it isn't avalible ...
Regards
Christian
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the
Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Hi,
I'm having difficulties installing the rpm's on my SuSE 9.3 machine.
I'm having dependency problems which I seem unable to resolve.
My output :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Documents rpm -Uvh lazarus-0.9.10-0.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
gtk+-devel is needed
Andrew Haines wrote:
Malcolm Poole wrote:
I have been trying to translate gtkmozembed.h, in the hope that I
could produce FreePascal/Gtk programs incorporating an HTML
browser. Has anyone else tried this or am I trying to do the
impossible?
I'm not 100% sure but I tinkered around
Hello Lazarus users/developpers,
I started this year with Delphi at school, and essentially because I
didn't
have Windows, I searched for an alternative and I found Lazarus through
FreePascal.
At first I tried to convert some very basic Delphi projects into
Lazarus-compatible
Matej Hausenblas wrote:
At first I tried to convert some very basic Delphi projects into
Lazarus-compatible code without completely destroying the original delphi
code. The conversion was successfull and now the tested code compiles under
the two compilers (fp+d6).
Did the projects include
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 23:11 -0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Matej Hausenblas wrote:
I've already asked on the IRC channel and was told that it should be
possible
to do with delphi6/7 but not 5.
Why not Delphi 5? AFAIK conversion between forms only requires the
delphi
-Original Message-
From: Matej Hausenblas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 November 2005 00:31
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Subject: [lazarus] Code universalizator (D6/FreePascal)
I told this to my delphi teacher and he asked if I'd be
intrested in creating
a GUI which
24 matches
Mail list logo
