I am having problems finding a way on Linux to stop a form flickering as it is
repainted when resized. On Delphi I used to do this by processing the Windows
Erase Background message and supressing the OS background fill (WM.Result=0).
When I converted this to the Equivalent LM message it didn't
http://online-judge.uva.es/board/viewtopic.php?t=10919
These people need to get out of their boat to see the world! :D
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:31:48 +0100
Paul Michell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having problems finding a way on Linux to stop a form flickering as
it is repainted when resized. On Delphi I used to do this by processing
the Windows Erase Background message and supressing the OS background fill
Well, this is normal.
All the C/C++ developers always say the same thing. For C/C++ developers, only exists C/C++. Probably, they sense _cool_ for this. Is the hackers life.
Today, i readed a message in a spanish web, about ADA. Well, a user post a comment about, ADA is not good because his
Thanks for the reply,
Is there any way on GTK1 of preventing the background fill?
My app will redraw the entire client from a bitmap and not need
the background fill first.
On Thursday 15 June 2006 10:54 am, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:31:48 +0100
Paul Michell [EMAIL
and powerfull
2006/6/15, Adilson Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Bisma Jayadi escreveu:
http://online-judge.uva.es/board/viewtopic.php?t=10919 These people need to get out of their boat to see the world! :DI learned to ignore this kind of discussion ages
My app will redraw the entire client from a bitmap and not needthe background fill first.
Do you look at
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/Developing_with_Graphics#Motion_Graphics_-_How_to_Avoid_flickering
I use the custom control option for my Skychart application and this work very
Why have their never been any successful Pascal dirivitive languages?
From C we have Java, C#, ActionScript, haXe etc. Why are there no real child
languages of Pascal?
-Original Message-
From: Bisma Jayadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 June 2006 14:20 PM
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, William Cairns wrote:
Why have their never been any successful Pascal dirivitive languages?
Because pascal is perfect. Why change a perfect language ?
Michael.
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 15 June 2006 08:23, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, William Cairns wrote:
Why have their never been any successful Pascal dirivitive languages?
Because pascal is perfect. Why change a perfect language ?
Michael.
What about Delphi, Modula 2, Action, the Apple
Good answer lol
Well, Java is like CAda is like Pascal etc..
Much languajes (can you say all except C) has something from Pascal.
2006/6/15, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, William Cairns wrote: Why have their never been any successful Pascal dirivitive
This one might be interesting - History of computer languages:
http://www.digibarn.com/collections/posters/tongues/ComputerLanguagesChart.png
As you see, with creation of Object Pascal the Pascal language is
absolutely finished and there is nothing more to be added to it.
BTW almost the same is
Why have their never been any successful Pascal dirivitive languages?
Because pascal is perfect. Why change a perfect language ?
What about Delphi, Modula 2, Action, the Apple Lisa Development Environment,
the whole UCSD P System..
I carefully said successful :) While I agree that
On 6/15/06, Alexander Todorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Borland is one company that provides commercial pascal compilers I
haven't heard of others.
Maybe not for windows =)
But for mobiles:
http://www.midletpascal.com/
In the past both Microsoft and Apple provided pascal compilers. There
was
At 11:20 15/06/2006, you wrote:
http://online-judge.uva.es/board/viewtopic.php?t=10919
These people need to get out of their boat to see the world! :D
-Bee-
As Peter 'N' Lewis said some years ago in an
interview (They asked why does he choose Pascal
for development and not c or c++)
' I
On 6/15/06, Alexander Todorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one might be interesting - History of computer languages:
http://www.digibarn.com/collections/posters/tongues/ComputerLanguagesChart.png
As you see, with creation of Object Pascal the Pascal language is
absolutely finished and there is
On 6/15/06, William Cairns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking more in the line of the way Java has taken over the world.
This all has to do with Sun Mirosystems, a lot of money and marketing
strategies.
Things that FPC/Lazarus doesn't have ATM.
I'd however like to see Pascal being moved
At 14:23 15/06/2006, you wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, William Cairns wrote:
Why have their never been any successful Pascal dirivitive languages?
Because pascal is perfect. Why change a perfect language ?
It's not needed. Pascal is a designed language by engineers, so it
has a slow study
On 6/15/06, William Cairns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like being able to compile Pascal to JavaByte code (Dont send me links on why
FPC cant - I've read them all - I still would like it though)
Althought a nice feature to have this isn´t indispensable. We can just
port Free Pascal to almost all
On 6/15/06, Alexander Todorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The key to increasing pascal usage is promotion. Something like
Microsoft and Sun do about their products. They are not the best but
they urge you to use them, promote them in various ways and in the end
there is the result.
Depends very
On 6/15/06, William Cairns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Midlet Pascal is nice - but it:
2. Not activly developed.
Really? The last version is from January, doesn´t seam so far away.
If so, maybe talking to the right people could get it open sourced.
More to do maintenance, avoid death, and build
Midlet Pascal is nice - but it:
2. Not activly developed.
Really? The last version is from January, doesn´t seam so far away.
I've been a member on their forums since sometime in January. I dont think I
have ever seen one of the developers post :( Unlike th eFPC and Lazarus
enviornment.
Midlet Pascal is nice - but it:
1. Doesn;t support Classes
2. Not activly developed.
All the mobile games I have made so far were done in MidletPascal so I know it
quite well.
-Original Message-
From: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 June 2006 15:21 PM
To:
Bram Kuijvenhoven wrote:
Al Boldi wrote:
Bram Kuijvenhoven wrote:
function TAncestor.ToStringSafe:string;
begin
if self=nil then Exit('nil');
Result:=ToString; // now it's safe to call the virtual method
end;
Are you sure it's really safe to call?
I think so:
Thanks Patrick,
I had seen that page on my search. If I am not mistaken, the custom control
will presumably have the same background fill event before you paint the star
chart? I am guessing that you have set the form's colour to black so that the
flicker on re-sizing the window is not so
I have a number of custom components which I've installed on an Extra
tab on the IDE toolbar.
I've tried the method described in the /components/custom directory, and
many variations on the theme, but the net result is always the same:
only the default icon is shown, so that all my components
Hello,
I implemented some very basic color handling for Qt widgets. Attached you can
find a patch for the Qt interface. Maybe later a different approach can be
followed,
but for the time being this just works.
bye
colors.tar.gz
Description: application/tgz
hi,
I am trying to implement mouse event handling for Qt widgets and have some
questions about the way the modifier keys are handled.
In Forms.pp : implementation of KeysToShiftState contains GetKeyState(VK_MENU).
I don't quite understand why the Keys parameter shouldn't contain the ALT key.
Is
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:59:51 +0200
Giuliano Colla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a number of custom components which I've installed on an Extra
tab on the IDE toolbar.
I've tried the method described in the /components/custom directory, and
many variations on the theme, but the net result
1. class that can have more then one object as it's parent (at this
Multiple Inheretance. Difficult to understand, difficult to implement,
but I have a problem where multiple inheretance was the solution, instead
of multiples interfaces.
2. Powerful containers for class usage such as class X
On 6/15/06, ik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
10. The infamous support of ... for infinite' parameters (You can
make open array's to work like that).
You can do that with a array of const type. Then you type:
Proc(param1, [param2, param3, param4,.])
Declared as:
procedure Proc(param1: Type;
On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. The amount of classes that comes with Java as part of the compiler :P
Can live with them. Make your own libraries.
i think that is wrong thinking. one of the reasons i was drawn to
freepascal, and then lazarus, being a java
32 matches
Mail list logo