Re: [lazarus] Laz / Fpc function listing

2007-11-18 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 17/11/2007, James Chandler Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am not complaining, but it isn't realistic to expect everybody to know what to look for in advance, or to do the first level of a lazarus function-name search using Delphi help. Delphi is well worth the money for me, a bargain in

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus IDE revamp

2007-11-18 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On Nov 18, 2007 12:36 AM, Ciprian Mustiata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That solution is the today solution for two visions of the same problem: what means Lazarus to became easy and more accepted. For a short term, for sure Lazarus can be as Delphi 7 like as it wants. There seams to be some

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus IDE revamp

2007-11-18 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 18/11/2007, Ciprian Mustiata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the long term benefits: - will hopefully became the newbie version of Lazarus - will offer a mini-framework on top of LCL, so it will remove a lot of hand-made designed code - it will not have to be a 100% compliant rule UI as

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus IDE revamp

2007-11-18 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Ciprian Mustiata schrieb: The top of reason of forking is: Lazarus itself as IDE, has *not* that goals, and wanting to achieve that plans in Lazarus development today has no sense, so instead arguing and fight for every new extra change, is easier to redesign places where is considered more

Re: [lazarus] Carbon TMemo with invisible font

2007-11-18 Thread Tom Gregorovic
On Nov 18, 2007 12:15 AM, Tobias Giesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, some change made since last week caused my TMemo to use the same color for the font that is used for the background. Only selected text can be seen. It does not matter which colors I choose for foreground or background.

[lazarus] Status of visual form inheritance

2007-11-18 Thread Gerard N/A
Hi all, Can you tell me what is the current status of visual form inheritance? Is there somebody working on it? Is there any bounty for it? (I can't see any in http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Bounties) Best regards, Gerard. _

Re: [lazarus] Status of visual form inheritance

2007-11-18 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:25:37 +0100 Gerard N/A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Can you tell me what is the current status of visual form inheritance? Is there somebody working on it? Is there any bounty for it? (I can't see any in http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Bounties) It's

Re: [lazarus] Status of visual form inheritance

2007-11-18 Thread Gerard N/A
Hi Mattias, It's basically working. Cool. Missing features: - When descendant and ancestor forms are designed at the same time in the IDE and ancestor is changed: apply changes to descendants Would be nice, but for the moment I can live without that. If closing the descendants and reopening

Re: [lazarus] Status of visual form inheritance

2007-11-18 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:21:16 +0100 Gerard N/A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mattias, It's basically working. Cool. Missing features: - When descendant and ancestor forms are designed at the same time in the IDE and ancestor is changed: apply changes to descendants Would be nice,

[lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-18 Thread Giuliano Colla
Svn r 12899 doesn't compile under linux/fpc 2.0.4. The error reported is wrong number of parameters specified in two BoolToStr calls in lcl/graphtype.pp module. Commenting out the second parameter of the call , it compiles fine, but the application crashes with a sigsev in

Re: [lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-18 Thread Giuliano Colla
Giuliano Colla ha scritto: Svn r 12899 doesn't compile under linux/fpc 2.0.4. Sorry, I got the wrong version number. 12899 *did* compile, 12913 doesn't. The problem seems to have started with r. 12906. The error reported is wrong number of parameters specified in two BoolToStr calls in

Re: [lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-18 Thread Marc Weustink
Giulio Bernardi wrote: A little bit off topic... but does lazarus still need to support fpc 2.0.4? AFAIK fpc 2.2.0 runs on all platforms supported by lazarus... or am I missing something? nope. 2.2.0 fails on OSX when sources are located on a casesensitive filesystem. So initially I plead

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus IDE revamp

2007-11-18 Thread Vincent Snijders
Florian Klaempfl schreef: Ciprian Mustiata schrieb: The top of reason of forking is: Lazarus itself as IDE, has *not* that goals, and wanting to achieve that plans in Lazarus development today has no sense, so instead arguing and fight for every new extra change, is easier to redesign places

RE: [lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-18 Thread Giulio Bernardi
A little bit off topic... but does lazarus still need to support fpc 2.0.4? AFAIK fpc 2.2.0 runs on all platforms supported by lazarus... or am I missing something? bye, Giulio _ Discover the new Windows Vista

Re: [lazarus] [r12910][Ubuntu][GTK2] Compilation failed

2007-11-18 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 01:51:00 +0100 Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 18, 2007, at 1:33 AM, Damien Gerard wrote: I've got the following compilation error after update the head revision 12910 : The r12883 is the last revision which compiles under Linux for me. In

Re: [lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-18 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:14:42 + Giulio Bernardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A little bit off topic... but does lazarus still need to support fpc 2.0.4? AFAIK fpc 2.2.0 runs on all platforms supported by lazarus... or am I missing something? The released fpc 2.2.0 has a bug on MacOSX. A

Re: [lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-18 Thread Vincent Snijders
Mattias Gaertner schreef: On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:14:42 + Giulio Bernardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A little bit off topic... but does lazarus still need to support fpc 2.0.4? AFAIK fpc 2.2.0 runs on all platforms supported by lazarus... or am I missing something? The released fpc 2.2.0

Re: [lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-18 Thread Paul Ishenin
Giuliano Colla wrote: Svn r 12899 doesn't compile under linux/fpc 2.0.4. The error reported is wrong number of parameters specified in two BoolToStr calls in lcl/graphtype.pp module. Commenting out the second parameter of the call , it compiles fine, but the application crashes with a sigsev

Re: [lazarus] [r12910][Ubuntu][GTK2] Compilation failed

2007-11-18 Thread Damien Gerard
On Nov 18, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 01:51:00 +0100 Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 18, 2007, at 1:33 AM, Damien Gerard wrote: I've got the following compilation error after update the head revision 12910 : The r12883 is the last

Re: [lazarus] Carbon TMemo with invisible font

2007-11-18 Thread James Chandler Jr
Hi Tom You do great work! Here is a symptom which might be related (or not). Am only mentioning it because this also had an invisible font issue. Am busy in Win32 right now, and will trace the issue further (if it still exists) when I can get back to carbon in a few weeks. I had four

[lazarus] IDE Crashes on Mac OS (gtk)

2007-11-18 Thread Tobias Giesen
Hello, the latest SVN version crashes a little more often than usual. The Find in Files dialog does not appear at all, instead there is an access violation. This is on Mac OS X 10.4 (i386) under X11 (gtk). Cheers, Tobias _

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus IDE revamp

2007-11-18 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 18/11/2007, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then starting coding instead of lengthy mails :) Is there already a public svn? Just to show how tough it is to create a copycat ide, even with company funding Have a look and SpeedSoft's Sybil IDE. Has anybody ever looked at

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus IDE revamp

2007-11-18 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 18/11/2007, Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: with a bit of Google searching. I'll attach a screenshot in my next posting (just in case it's to big for this post) As promised. See attachment. Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpGUI - a

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus IDE revamp

2007-11-18 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 18/11/2007, Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18/11/2007, Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: with a bit of Google searching. I'll attach a screenshot in my next posting (just in case it's to big for this post) As promised. See attachment. Man looking at all

Re: [lazarus] IDE Crashes on Mac OS (gtk)

2007-11-18 Thread Damien Gerard
On Nov 18, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Tobias Giesen wrote: Hello, the latest SVN version crashes a little more often than usual. The Find in Files dialog does not appear at all, instead there is an access violation. This is on Mac OS X 10.4 (i386) under X11 (gtk). In the same time How do you

[lazarus] About and Help on Carbon Menu Bar

2007-11-18 Thread Tobias Giesen
Hello, is there a known best way to get the About My App menu item into the so-called Application Menu on the Mac OS Menu bar? Also is there a way to get the keyboard shortcut for Help to be Cmd-? rather than F1? If not I'll probably construct my menu directly using Carbon Menu Manager ...

Re: [lazarus] IDE Crashes on Mac OS (gtk)

2007-11-18 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On Nov 18, 2007 10:36 PM, Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the same time How do you re-build Lazarus with GTK2 ? http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/GTK2_Interface#Using_the_Gtk2_interface_under_Mac_OS_X However I'm not sure it's worth it, as gtk2 also requires X11, so it's not a big

Re: [lazarus] Laz / Fpc function listing

2007-11-18 Thread James Chandler Jr
- Original Message - From: Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ah.. this is a common issue. While a lot of ppl think all routines you use in delphi are from delphi, it in fact isn't. You have the ones made by Borland which you will find in the rtl or vcl and you have the translation of

Re: [lazarus] DataAccess components in lazarus 2.9.24

2007-11-18 Thread Lee Jenkins
Jury Azovtzev wrote: Hallo! I tryied to make education LiveCD with lazarus for students in local college. But when i run all i found out there is not transactions, Mysql and PostrgreSQL components in new lazarus anymore. Could someone explane? Are they in other place now? Or what i have to

Re: [lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-18 Thread Giuliano Colla
Paul Ishenin ha scritto: Giuliano Colla wrote: Svn r 12899 doesn't compile under linux/fpc 2.0.4. The error reported is wrong number of parameters specified in two BoolToStr calls in lcl/graphtype.pp module. Commenting out the second parameter of the call , it compiles fine, but the

Re: [lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-18 Thread Giuliano Colla
Mattias Gaertner ha scritto: On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:42:53 +0100 Giuliano Colla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giuliano Colla ha scritto: Svn r 12899 doesn't compile under linux/fpc 2.0.4. Sorry, I got the wrong version number. 12899 *did* compile, 12913 doesn't. The problem seems to

Re: [lazarus] IDE Crashes on Mac OS (gtk)

2007-11-18 Thread Damien Gerard
On Nov 18, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: On Nov 18, 2007 10:36 PM, Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the same time How do you re-build Lazarus with GTK2 ? http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/GTK2_Interface#Using_the_Gtk2_interface_under_Mac_OS_X I don't

Re: [lazarus] DataAccess components in lazarus 2.9.24

2007-11-18 Thread Damien Gerard
On Nov 18, 2007, at 11:43 PM, Lee Jenkins wrote: Jury Azovtzev wrote: Hallo! I tryied to make education LiveCD with lazarus for students in local college. But when i run all i found out there is not transactions, Mysql and PostrgreSQL components in new lazarus anymore. Could someone

Re: [lazarus] DataAccess components in lazarus 2.9.24

2007-11-18 Thread Chris Kirkpatrick
A live CD is one that you put in your CD rive and boot from it; it usually contains a distribution of linux, like Mepis, Ubuntu or Koppix, which gets installed in a RAMDISK and you can run it without involving the computer's hard drive. Good for evaluating software (you can run linux on

Re: [lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-18 Thread Paul Ishenin
Giuliano Colla wrote: Paul Ishenin ha scritto: Giuliano Colla wrote: Svn r 12899 doesn't compile under linux/fpc 2.0.4. The error reported is wrong number of parameters specified in two BoolToStr calls in lcl/graphtype.pp module. Commenting out the second parameter of the call , it compiles

Re: [lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-18 Thread Paul Ishenin
Paul Ishenin пишет: Giuliano Colla wrote: Paul Ishenin ha scritto: Giuliano Colla wrote: Svn r 12899 doesn't compile under linux/fpc 2.0.4. The error reported is wrong number of parameters specified in two BoolToStr calls in lcl/graphtype.pp module. Commenting out the second parameter of the

Re: [lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4

2007-11-18 Thread Jeff Steinkamp
- Original Message - From: Paul Ishenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lazarus@miraclec.com Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 20:39 Subject: Re: [lazarus] last svn problems under fpc 2.0.4 Paul Ishenin пишет: Giuliano Colla wrote: Paul Ishenin ha scritto: Giuliano Colla wrote: Svn r