paths again to the
fpc.cfg (and the situation is pretty much the same as before i started
with the packages)
Is this normal, or i'm i overlooking something? How can i share the nice
package idea's with the compiler?
Greetings,
Marius
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Marius schreef:
Vincent
lazbuild yourproject.lpi
Mattias
So that was the whole trickery (i never used lazbuild before)
Thanks!
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
archives at
I keep learning from my mistakes, i did not even what the .compiled was
and why it was there. Now i can turn the .compiled with little effort
into a batch file!
Thanks.
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Is this normal, or i'm i overlooking something? How can i share the nice
package idea's with
can't see head or tails in the project at this moment (need to look
deeper, but it looks like its just unix for now).
Greetings,
Marius
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
Lee Jenkins wrote:
I've used powtils a bit. Fast, very fast.
Yeah it is. However it looks like theres little classes and structure,
but thats just the impression i got after a few hours in comparison to a
standard cgi application.
The only thing I don't like
is with standard cgi you
Bee wrote:
Yup. But FPC also has its own CGI framework. It might be a good
alternative besides Powtils. I never use it though.
Pretty and simple as far i can see with the tcgiapplication. The lcl cgi
package addon is not really helpfull (i have some problems with the
tdatamodule properties
Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Lee, please read the last post in my blog (Powerful CGI applications).
It's an example on how to resolve that problem using PowUtils.
This one i assume?
http://leonardorame.blogspot.com/2007/12/powerful-cgi-applications.html
So if i understand correctly you add an
I need to add paths for indy and a few from lazarus\components for
example which i mostly create at runtime, constantly changing the
project compiler options (other sources only used by IDE) is becoming
boring.
Is there a place in lazarus to add search paths so lazarus can open
3thparty
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Create a package for the units.
Should i create a (dummy) package to add search paths to lazarus???
Installing and recompiling the whole ide just to add a few paths sounds
kind of stupid. (The tools do not contain any design stuff). Then again
if this works it saves
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
The package system of lazarus is different from Delphi. You don't need to
install a package to use it.
Here i went wrong, i thought i always needed to install it into the IDE!
Thanks..
_
To
Cause seems to be passing a read only property into the var parameter
of: ReadXMLFile(var ADoc: TXMLDocument; ).
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.3.1 [2008/01/29] for i386
Copyright (c) 1993-2007 by Florian Klaempfl
Target OS: Win32 for i386
Compiling lazarus.pp
).
But what would be the best approach? Sofar i have only seen cgi.
Standard cgi, powutils or even fastcgi on top of apache can do the job
as far as i can see. Is anybody using these cgi-tools? Any good
combination? Or are there other way's to create a agile and secure
webserver?
Thanks,
Marius
methods. This mailing
list is the easiest as its delivered right into youre mailbox.
Greetings,
Marius
Sergio Samayoa wrote:
Interesting.
What puzzles me is the very low traffic on forums and this list: Very few
active posters.
Regards
I just hope the Lazarus community isn't discouraged by those negative comments.
;-) Everything there is being bashed. In my opinion nothing in that
forum should ever be taken to serious (including the teamb or
codegear-team msgs).
Its all free advertisement in the end (that included the
Paul, i think you solved the win32 docking problem with the 13775 fix.
(and it reminds me painfully i have been investigating those ws_child
options myself without solving it :))
Anywhay, very exciting docking news, finally i can old style dock my
configuration forms like i did in delphi. A
there other way's to get the attention of more developers?
Greetings,
Marius
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
I have created a little universal Docking unit (all new code).
I'm just testing it on GTK2, QT and Win32.
Great, did you manage to fix the win32 docking bug? (i have been
looking, but was unable to narrow down that problem)
Greetings,
Marius
as a dinosaur
before i noticed lazarus/fpc ;-)
Greetings,
Marius
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
client to FPC. It is
one of the most CPU extensive applications i know.
I also want to experiment with NVIDIA or ATI GPU instructions but i have
yet no idea how to do this (also need a new computer for this).
Greetings,
Marius
).
Greetings,
Marius
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
In Delphi there is a a class TExample defined in file1.pas.
TExample=class
protected
FValue:longint;
end;
in file2.pas I did:
use file1;
{...}
Example:=TExample.Create;
if Example.FValue=0 then begin...
{...}
When compiling with FPC and $MODE DELPHI I get an Identifier not
found error.
Any
But I'm shure there's no Class-descendant in file2.
Am I right that the handling of protected-statements should be the
same in D7 and FPC? Then I'm looking elsewhere for the solution to this
mysterious phenomenon... *bg*
AFAIK they behave exactly the same.
I can only think you are
I would like to use virtualtreeview in the IDE for the future project
manager. Its the only component that combines a tree, icons and multiple
columns with some nice colors.
However the first project manager will just be a simple list of projects.
Bee wrote:
Hi all,
I propose to Lazarus
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:42:41 +0100
Marius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to use virtualtreeview in the IDE for the future project
manager. Its the only component that combines a tree, icons and
multiple columns with some nice colors.
The IDE can only use
recompiling Lazarus.
Besides dragdrop are there any things you would like to see implemented
in a new approach? For instance Mattias wants autodocking and he wants
to save the dock-layout (desktop ideas?)
Youre ideas, opinions and observations please
Greetings,
Marius
a hint for me or have a quick solution?
Greetings,
Marius
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
var AForm: TForm;
begin
AForm := TForm.Create(Self);
AForm.Parent := TWinControl(Self);
AForm.Align := alTop;
AForm.Color := clGreen;
AForm.Visible := true;
AForm.Visible := true
Never mind, both are known problems.
http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=10420
http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=1052
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
, line and claw) with
the new text you would also have a nice logo.
Then again i'm sure there any many other nice ideas.
Greetings,
Marius
Bee wrote:
Hi all,
Continuing Laurent's work, I can manage my graphics designer to make a
new Lazarus splash image. The image at http://i5.tinypic.com
, line and claw) with
the new text you would also have a nice logo.
Then again i'm sure there any many other nice ideas.
Greetings,
Marius
Bee wrote:
Hi all,
Continuing Laurent's work, I can manage my graphics designer to make a
new Lazarus splash image. The image at http://i5.tinypic.com
them the same as i still work in
delphi a lot.
Greetings,
Marius
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:51:49 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/12/2007, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Ctrl-Shift-G shows the procedure list
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
If it helps them to decide:
I'm currently writing specs for a 'serious' application (a grade tracker
for teachers) which will use (embedded) firebird as a back-end database,
which will be using tiOPF or InstantObjects and LazReport - all this in
Lazarus. This
Seems that 80% of firebird users are Delphi users
if i look at this pool votes (the one on the right sidebar)
http://www.firebirdnews.org/
In a way is no shock to me - i started working as an interbase / Delphi
programmer
I think Lazarus+firebird package needs more attention (better
Tony Maro wrote:
Meh... I just installed Ubuntu for AMD 64.
So far, the few small apps I've tried to compile from source have
failed (C, not Pascal.)
Can I safely make the assumption that trying to develop for I386
machines is going to be a pain in the butt, at least short-term?
Well
I downloaded fpc 2.0.1 source code and have some problems for building it
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/lazarus/fpc-2.0.1-050923.source.tar.gz?download
tar -zxvf fpc-2.0.1-050923.source.tar.gz
cd fpc
make build
/opt/fpc/bin/ppcx64 -Ur -Ur -Xs -n -Fi../inc -Fi../x86_64 -Fi../unix
34 matches
Mail list logo
