Does ClickOnce run on FireFox?
Think it does
btw, here's some link on ClickOnce
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/t71a733d.aspx
This is much better higher level description of ClickOnce
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/netframework/aa497348.aspx
At the bottom of this page has
Ahh. Come on. I first thougth ClickOnce was a way to run
windows application as client-side web applications.
Now I see it´s just a new way to install software! Horrible. Microsoft
just reinvented software installing, WOW It´s the 2.0 version of
the autorun for pendrives and cdroms
This is another thing about microsoft. They create a great marketing
slogan, make it seam like a wonderful thing. Then you start reading,
feel like an idiot for not understanding what it does. Yet, it seams
wonderful, althougth you have no idea what it really does. And after a
while you realise
George Birbilis wrote:
I´ve already done some project on PHP, and it´s biggest
problem is that it takes too long to do trivial tasks such as
create a simple data-aware page.
They use others' snippets a lot and copy-pasting leads to spaghetti as
usual
That's not really PHP's problem; you
For those guys that liked Python, I think the following is a compiler, not
interpretter:
(it's IronPython for .NET, they say for ASP.net below cause they recently
released an integration package for using IronPython with VS.net and ASP.net
more easily)
Microsoft IronPython for ASP.NET
George Birbilis schrieb:
For those guys that liked Python, I think the following is a compiler, not
interpretter:
First, what has this to do with lazarus? This isn't discussion related
but plain advertisment. Further, no .Net language is really compiled but
only translated into CLI: see all
On 10/30/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. ASP.NET ties you to the Windows IIS server.Apache is still the mostused webserver, PHP the most used web scripting language.As a avid web developer I feel it worth mentioning that PHP is on it's way out. It is my somewhat informed
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Chad Crabtree wrote:
On 10/30/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. ASP.NET ties you to the Windows IIS server. Apache is still the most
used webserver, PHP the most used web scripting language.
As a avid web developer I feel it worth mentioning
As a avid web developer I feel it worth mentioning that PHP is on it's way
out.
I´ve already done some project on PHP, and it´s biggest problem is
that it takes too long to do trivial tasks such as create a simple
data-aware page.
In each case, I'm confident that Morfik will outdo ASP.Net
Anyway, as I said, all is a mater of personal taste, the more
options a
menu offers to choose from, the better ;o)
No. Using .Net is simply stupid and destroying your own. Some people
don't get this because they are almost brainwashed by MS but one can't
help them anyways anymore.
Now,
George Birbilis schrieb:
I wouldn't call the Ximian guys bad ones (even after they
were bought
by Novell), nor the GNU guys, do you?
Well, I guess you got that Microsoft invented .Net and
holds the .Net patents? Or didn't they tell you this at your
lessons about marketing .Net?
I don't get
that they used decompilation to make sure some features
would be implemented in mono exactly as they were implemented
in the .NET version of Microsoft
I meant to say used decompilation to make sure some features would behave
in mono exactly as they behave in the .NET version of Microsoft in
Sorry for replying after sometime, some of your mails had gone to my junk
folder
- What .NET version to target?
Any version.
That 9 folds the amount of work, since the whole lib must be
done several times.
The lib and IDE are / should be written in Pascal, so one just makes the FPC
Sir,
Respectfully, I think you should go to sourceforge.net, create a new
project (could be called fpc4dotnet or anything else you like), and
then create a new mailling list to discuss your project.
In here you can discuss Lazarus supporting plugins, and things like that.
At this point, this
On 11/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting David Mears [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The only two things Pascal really misses for me are think ability to
natively link with C++, and keyword level associative arrays. The later
What do you mean by keyword level associative arrays ?
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Lepidosteus wrote:
On 11/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Quoting David Mears [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The only two things Pascal really misses for me are think ability to
natively link with C++, and keyword level associative arrays. The later
What
Maybe not enough people have enough interest in Lazarus
future at all
Anyway you can put up a poll if you wish e.g. at the Lazarus site
Since the numbers increase steadily Lazarus is definitvely on
the right way. Following some shitty technology done by the
bad ugly guy in the IT world
George Birbilis schrieb:
Maybe not enough people have enough interest in Lazarus
future at all
Anyway you can put up a poll if you wish e.g. at the Lazarus site
Since the numbers increase steadily Lazarus is definitvely on
the right way. Following some shitty technology done by the
bad ugly
People always ask me what prgmLang to use, so I ask them which OS,
when they say Windows, I say go VS.
I ask what do you want to do?.
I'd say to them the same, but this is for standalone programmers and small
flexible teams of deeply knowledgeable (and thus adaptable) programmers. For
I wouldn't call the Ximian guys bad ones (even after they
were bought
by Novell), nor the GNU guys, do you?
Well, I guess you got that Microsoft invented .Net and
holds the .Net patents? Or didn't they tell you this at your
lessons about marketing .Net?
I don't get such lessons from MS,
Can we stop this stupid thread now.
Talking about .NET for 14 days now!
What does this have to do with lazarus?
do you think talking about a popular platform and whether Lazarus and FPC
should consider targetting it in the future is crap? As you wish...
anyway, we can rename any future
George Birbilis schrieb:
Portable.NET is interesting stuff too (different beast from
Ximian/Novell's Mono and from the reference CLR implementation or .NET
runtime from MS)
George Birbilis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Microsoft MVP J# 2004-2006
Borland Spirit of Delphi
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:55:23AM +0200, George Birbilis wrote:
later.
But I don't see FPC improving anything in ASP.NET, or having aspirations
to
do so.
FPC could be used as backend language for ASP.net apps (similar to how one
can use Borland and Chrome compilers), since ASP.net is
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:41:50PM -0800, johnf wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 14:12, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I think full time python programmers are more rare than full time
pascal/delphi programmers.
First let me say I'm not disagreeing or agreeing. But I hope it's true. I
just
.NET isn't a platform, it's a framework (a bad one).
This is your opinion, accepted, but unfounded
If you talk about a platform you should consider porting fpc
to the CLR.
Why? To compile to a platform you don't need to run on that platform the
compiler itself
If you need such a thing
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 00:43, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:41:50PM -0800, johnf wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 14:12, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I think full time python programmers are more rare than full time
pascal/delphi programmers.
First let me
George Birbilis schrieb:
.NET isn't a platform, it's a framework (a bad one).
This is your opinion, accepted, but unfounded
This is a fact.
Maybe not enough people have enough interest in Lazarus future at all
Anyway you can put up a poll if you wish e.g. at the Lazarus site
Since the
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:53:40PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Despite all FUD, afaik Delphi is still development system number #2 by
sales, after MS' VS.
But that is a far behind #2. No surprise though; it's pretty dumb to develop
on Windows with anything other
Quoting David Mears [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The only two things Pascal really misses for me are think ability to
natively link with C++, and keyword level associative arrays. The later
What do you mean by keyword level associative arrays ?
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:57:53AM +0200, George Birbilis wrote:
3. ASP.NET ties you to the Windows IIS server. Apache is still the
most used webserver, PHP the most used web scripting language.
Nope, ASP.net runs on Apache too (even without using mono, but classic .NET
runtime)
As far
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, George Birbilis wrote:
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers
what FPC can't do better without adding another dependency on
Microsoft.
Because there will be no more Win32 API use from Microsoft in the future.
Given that in Vista about 40 out
George Birbilis schrieb:
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers
what FPC can't do better without adding another dependency on
Microsoft.
Because there will be no more Win32 API use from Microsoft in the future.
Please stop spreading this FUD. This is the lazarus mailing
johnf schrieb:
If writting a wrapper was easy why haven't we got a completed QT interface?
Because Qt is GPL or expensive so few people are really interessted in it.
Why does the GTK2 have so many bugs?
I use lazarus gtk2 now daily and it works fine.
With regard to the speed of
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
George Birbilis schrieb:
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers
what FPC can't do better without adding another dependency on
Microsoft.
Because there will be no more Win32 API use from Microsoft in the future.
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
George Birbilis schrieb:
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers
what FPC can't do better without adding another dependency on
Microsoft.
Because there will be no more Win32 API use from Microsoft
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:57:53AM +0200, George Birbilis wrote:
3. ASP.NET ties you to the Windows IIS server. Apache is still the
most used webserver, PHP the most used web scripting language.
Nope, ASP.net runs on Apache too (even
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, George Birbilis wrote:
1. Uniform database access was available through ODBC already.
ODBC was and is an accepted standard. .NET data access is
necessarily slower and more cumbersome.
If ODBC was good, then why did Borland give for years its own database
I read the other day on OSNews about a company that developed a Object
Pascal compiler, that compiles to Java Bytecode. Maybe that will be
of interest to you. Search OSNews if you want to read the article.
thanks, will check it out, hadn't heard of it (hope they don't mean Apple's
older
On 10/31/06, Μπιρμπίλης Γιώργος [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, this is the official word from Microsoft. After all I'm a Microsoft MVP.
What is a MVP?
The question is whether Lazarus will be flexible enough at that time to
adapt. So better plan ahead a bit (say start by studying .NET a bit
Avalon etc. will be available on older OS'es too than Vista, just not
running natively (emulated or something)
Ummm... Just like DirectX 10???
Yes, it's a schedule issue, has been mentioned in the past by Microsoft,
that other platforms will follow either with native implementation or with
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:02:13PM -0800, johnf wrote:
If writting a wrapper was easy why haven't we got a completed QT interface?
The same reason as why GTK exists at all. QT had license problems for a long
while. There simply was not much interest.
Moreover, Lazarus is way more than a
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, George Birbilis wrote:
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers
what FPC can't do better without adding another dependency on
Microsoft.
Because there will be no more Win32 API use from Microsoft in the future.
Given that in Vista
George Birbilis schrieb:
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers
what FPC can't do better without adding another dependency on
Microsoft.
Because there will be no more Win32 API use from Microsoft in the
future.
Given that in Vista about 40 out of 2000 core libraries
I don't see why one would consider Win32 API a better architecture than
.NET.
My experience is different (I've been programming from 1986-87 or
something on
various languages and platforms including microprogramming and bytecoding
by
hand)
It's better because it can be accessed from any
On 10/31/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those are commercial products, plus not opensource. Borland Turbo
Delphi for .NET Explorer is free, but only for personal use I think
(maybe also free for free/opensource projects? Not sure) and Chrome's
command-line compiler is only
I'm speaking of MS new APIs and products.
Yes, which are dropped after a few years, see e.g. VB.
VB.net is VB on steroids in my opinion. Although I loved Turbo Basic and
PowerBasic, I never liked VB6 but Delphi instead (maybe cause I also liked
Turbo Pascal and Borland Pascal [but TurboVision
George Birbilis schrieb:
I'm speaking of MS new APIs and products.
Yes, which are dropped after a few years, see e.g. VB.
VB.net is VB on steroids in my opinion.
This doesn't help people losing their old code base. People followed
another Microsoft hype and now they are lost.
I didn't
Please, please, please.
STOP spreading this FUD. This is the lazarus mailing list and not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] now all we know that you are a MVP but please,
don´t make more merits.
I am another programmer that think that .NET is not the solution. Don´t
sell us .NET. I have never need it,
Ah, that triggered my memory... Here is the link.
http://www.webcom.com/mhc/pascal.html
Graeme.
On 31/10/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only found some stuff on Modula-2 (the descendent of Pascal)
http://freepages.modula2.org/oldnew.html
On 10/31/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason I'd see Lazarus support .NET is cause it's a target platform
separate from Win32 that it should take really seriously in my opinion
Yes, sure, there are lot´s of target platforms separate from Win32,
like SymbianOS, Java, PalmOS,
On 10/31/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are there FPC class libraries specially for WinCE features
We have some special libraries, like this:
http://ccrdu.de/docs/pkCEStuff.htm
But generally we just use Cross-platform solutions that work
everywhere. For database you can use
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:57:25AM +0200, George Birbilis wrote:
- What .NET version to target?
Any version.
That 9 folds the amount of work, since the whole lib must be done several
times.
Visual Studio.net can do similarly (you select the target .NET framework
dependency [can be set to
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 03:35, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:02:13PM -0800, johnf wrote:
If writting a wrapper was easy why haven't we got a completed QT
interface?
The same reason as why GTK exists at all. QT had license problems for a
long while. There simply
For your example about serial communication, see general
multiplatform hardware access tutorial here:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Hardware_Access
Thanks,
see http://www.mech.upatras.gr/~robgroup/teams/logic/demos/kaidan/index.html
in case your think it has something useful for porting
On 10/31/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* For example apps deployable via both offline media and network URLs or
webpages, that can check for updates automatically or manually and
autoupdate from the web,
You don´t need .NET for that. Just write a component that
automatically
That app is alive online after several years (was made with VS.net
2002 and
.NET1.0)
Initial project was just 1euro including the cleanup of the
original VB6
Outsourced to China?
Nope, implemented by myself:
1) Kept the ADO stuff instead of going to ADO.net (worked fine under
On 10/31/06, Lepidosteus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now this thread gets interesting ...
Is this just a plain new idea (maybe coming from this topic), or
something already discussed between the devs ?
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php?name=PNphpBB2file=viewtopict=2489highlight=intraweb
On 10/31/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks,see http://www.mech.upatras.gr/~robgroup/teams/logic/demos/kaidan/index.html in case your think it has something useful for porting to Lazarus sample
code (or if anyone want to make tutorials on how to convert serial accesscode from
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:08:46AM -0800, johnf wrote:
Now you really spoiled it. The only Ruby app I know is the FreeBSD
portupgrade package, and it is unbearably slow.
OK guys I like FPC because it's compiled. What I'm suggesting is the OOP in
python works. Is it perfect - no (no
On 10/31/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does ClickOnce run on FireFox?Think it does.BTW, I suppose FireFox does support Netscape-style plugin DLLs for runningstuff inside a webpage (.NET provides a host ActiveX control and plugin forWinForm controls and J# WebBrowser controls [=Java
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:10:07PM -0800, johnf wrote:
I am of the opinion that there maybe 1000's of apps written in Python. But I
could be wrong. However, I suggest you look at the job openings for python
programmers - http://www.python.org/community/jobs/ - for this month alone.
I
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 14:12, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I think full time python programmers are more rare than full time
pascal/delphi programmers.
First let me say I'm not disagreeing or agreeing. But I hope it's true. I just
wonder what evidence you have. I could use the evidence to
George Birbilis wrote:
There are a few .net resources here:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Using_Pascal_Libraries_with_.NET_and_Mono
thanks
not sure if you mention the GNU C# compiler there btw, might be helpful
to some people (compiles C# to native code, without dependency on .NET
Does ClickOnce run on FireFox?Think it does.BTW, I suppose
FireFox does support Netscape-style plugin DLLs for runningstuff
inside a webpage (.NET provides a host ActiveX control and plugin
forWinForm controls and J# WebBrowser controls [=Java applet class])
But Firefox doesn´t support
Why is it that every body and anything got a Dot Net version?
Cause .NET is a new and carefully designed OOP platform
Even Borland's got a dot net enabled Delphi coming it seems.
Delphi supports .NET since version 8 (version 7 had a preview .NET compiler
if I remember well - a command-line
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, George Birbilis wrote:
Why is it that every body and anything got a Dot Net version?
Cause .NET is a new and carefully designed OOP platform
That's what they want you to believe of course.
Reality is: Nothing new under the sun :)
[cut]
My colleagues in other
On 30/10/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nonsense. I improve every day. I don't waste my time learning another
language. I do learn new exciting things every day, and I apply them
best and fastest using the language I know best: Object Pascal.
Learning a new programming language
My colleagues in other departments like Physics and Math
regret they
dint go the CS route. But I regret I dint stick to Physics or
Mathematics. In these an Equation is always an equation. We dont
have another company coming up and throwing away an
equation for a
new one.
And
PM
To: 'lazarus@miraclec.com'
Subject: RE: [lazarus] Lazarus and DOT Net
My colleagues in other departments like Physics and Math
regret they
dint go the CS route. But I regret I dint stick to Physics or
Mathematics. In these an Equation is always an
equation. We dont
have
George Birbilis schrieb:
Who says you have to learn a new language? Since Borland did it with
Delphi.net and provided Object Pascal compiler for .NET with not many
changes to Object Pascal language, then FreePascal can also do it.
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers
On 30/10/06, Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers what FPC
can't do better without adding another dependency on Microsoft.
Exactly! Not to mention that Microsoft's .NET is not cross-platform.
Yes, Mono is trying to make it
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers what FPC
can't do better without adding another dependency on Microsoft.
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
David Mears schrieb:
What are you talking about, think about all the speed, power and control
you can give up in exchange for lots of extra programming time!
Feel free to use VS and get a happy hyper :)
_
To unsubscribe: mail
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers what FPC
can't do better without adding another dependency on Microsoft.
Exactly! Not to mention that Microsoft's .NET is not cross-platform.
Yes, Mono is trying to make it cross-platform, but they are forever
going to play the
Cesar Romero schrieb:
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers what FPC
can't do better without adding another dependency on Microsoft.
Exactly! Not to mention that Microsoft's .NET is not cross-platform.
Yes, Mono is trying to make it cross-platform, but they are forever
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
of skills, and on top I would know all these languages only superficially.
agreed 200%
and then RAD became RTTW (Rapid To The Wall) ;-)
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
Nah, the only language I ever loved was Pascal. I never cared for
anything that didn't compile to an executable of some sort. All of my
scripts are written in pascal rather than bash, Perl, or Python.
Consequentially, all of my scripts are lightening fast.
When there's a Linux version of
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:15:07PM +0200, George Birbilis wrote:
Why is it that every body and anything got a Dot Net version?
Cause .NET is a new and carefully designed OOP platform
As already said by others, the principles are not so new. Java of course,
but also UCSD and a lot other GCed
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:01:04PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
George Birbilis wrote:
If we could have Lazarus support many compilers via plugin packages, it
would be cool, cause one could create wrappers for both Chrome and
Borland's Object Pascal compilers for .NET
I love plug-ins!
The only two things Pascal really misses for me are think ability to
natively link with C++, and keyword level associative arrays.
Did you have a look at unit contnrs? If that fails, have a look at decal (in
contribs SVN).
_
But where is the advantage ?
Use code done and well tested, yes is a advantage, maybe not for
you or me, but someone can have the right to think that is a advantage.
Eg: When I start to write my OPF, tiOPF was there, stable and beautifull, but
doesnt matches with my needs at that moment.
On 30/10/06, Cesar Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eg: When I start to write my OPF, tiOPF was there, stable and beautifull, but
doesnt matches with my needs at that moment.
Could you mention what was wrong or missing in tiOPF to fulfill your
needs? What needs would that be? I'm always
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:01:04PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
George Birbilis wrote:
If we could have Lazarus support many compilers via plugin packages,
it would be cool, cause one could create wrappers for both Chrome and
Borland's Object Pascal compilers for
Python is nice OOP language
Can you name apps? Afaik it is mostly used for a bit of in application
scripting and some webapps. But is it really a Delphi replacement? I doubt
it. What does it use for GUI btw?
I assume you are not kidding about the apps. IMHO smart (a package updater
written in
Hy Graeme,
Could you mention what was wrong or missing in tiOPF to fulfill your
needs? What needs would that be? I'm always interesting in ideas that
can improve tiOPF.
I think that not wrong, just missing something at that time, I cant
remember right, it was more than 3 years ago, and after
George Birbilis wrote:
If we could have Lazarus support many compilers via plugin packages, it
would be cool, cause one could create wrappers for both Chrome and Borland's
Object Pascal compilers for .NET
You more or less already can. Go to the compiler options, last tab.
Change the Compiler
I'm not a Java fan, but I have a say about this:
Java is one language, many platforms.
.NET is many languages, one platform.
If we consider that Free Pascal is also one language, many platforms
and DOES NOT require a Virtual Machine, we are better served here.
2006/10/30, Marc Weustink [EMAIL
johnf schrieb:
Python is nice OOP language
Can you name apps? Afaik it is mostly used for a bit of in application
scripting and some webapps. But is it really a Delphi replacement? I doubt
it. What does it use for GUI btw?
I assume you are not kidding about the apps. IMHO smart (a package
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:57:57 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Cesar Romero wrote:
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers
what FPC can't do better without adding another dependency on
Microsoft.
[...]
So
I know it has been said here and there already, but a great addition
to lazarus/fpc would be RAD web developpment.
Aka develop your website using pascal and let the
always-the-same-boring-ugly-hard-to-figure-out javascript code be made
automagically.
AFAIK, IntraWeb while very powerfull now only
Since there's VCL.net port from Borland, Lazarus could also support .NET and
do similar port of its GUI libs in the future.
You got it all backwards. Exactly because there is VCL.NET and also
Chrome is that we definetively don't need a Free Pascal port to .NET,
after all Object Pascal users are
I do not recognize the reference to .PAS -- is this part of the FPC or Lazarus? If it's not, it needs a more 'searchable' name.
On 10/30/06, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:57:57 +0100 (CET)Michael Van Canneyt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Cesar
On 10/30/06, Howard Lee Harkness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not recognize the reference to .PAS -- is this part of the FPC or
Lazarus? If it's not, it needs a more 'searchable' name.
It was a joke.
He was demonstrating how one can suddently use something that already
existed to create a
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers
what FPC can't do better without adding another dependency on
Microsoft.
Because there will be no more Win32 API use from Microsoft in the future.
See article (from some years ago) on Borland community website by
vice-president and
On 31/10/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly! Not to mention that Microsoft's .NET is not cross-platform.
Yes, Mono is trying to make it cross-platform, but they are
forever going to play the catch-up game! Microsoft will keep
dictating .NET and forever break Mono. And
On 31/10/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not a Java fan, but I have a say about this:
Java is one language, many platforms.
Java is one language (there had been efforts to make other compilers produce
Java bytecode, esp. C/C++ but Sun wasn't very happy about it in the past
On 31/10/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And why should we do so? I still don't see what .Net offers
what FPC can't do better without adding another dependency on
Microsoft.
Because there will be no more Win32 API use from Microsoft in the future.
Don't count on that! Most
George Birbilis wrote:
RE: [lazarus] Lazarus and DOT Net
If you target .NET you have much of that stuff ready (for that target
at least), e.g. .NET Compact Framework for WinCE/PocketPC
i used to prototype and compare both vs and fpc for ppc progs.
and there was no doubt, even
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Thomas Miller wrote:
I think most people are interested in ASP.Net as it makes developing web
aps almost as easy as developing native aps in Delphi.
I still use Delphi for native and Chrome with ASP.Net for web development.
Thomas Miller schrieb:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Thomas Miller wrote:
I think most people are interested in ASP.Net as it makes developing web
aps almost as easy as developing native aps in Delphi.
I still use Delphi for native and Chrome with ASP.Net for web development.
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
