Felipe,
Have you tried NeoOffice? It's a native OO port for OS X. I don't think
many Mac users would be happy with an X11 version of OO.
http://www.neooffice.org/neojava/en/index.php
Thanks.
-Phil
-Original Message-
From: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I like the X11-version of OO way more better then the native one. The
native one works slower, a bit unstable, has less features but on the
other side more problems. (But I must admit, I tested it one year ago or
so.)
And it's also no problem to have X on your Mac OS X, it's installed by
default
Albert,
Please test the latest NeoOffice. I believe a year ago it was still at
OO 1.1. Much improved since then.
X11 is not installed by default on OS X.
Thanks.
-Phil
From: Albert Zeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 31,
On Thu, 31 May 2007 10:54:12 -0400
Hess, Philip J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Albert,
Please test the latest NeoOffice. I believe a year ago it was still at
OO 1.1. Much improved since then.
Maybe you missed the point of Felipe.
At the moment the only LCL interface for MacOSX that is good
Felipe,
You should be able to create an app bundle for Lazarus, even with its
dependence on needing X11 already running. See
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/OS_X_Programming_Tips. I had this
working at one time.
Note that you'll probably want to go a step further and try putting all
of the
Hess, Philip J schreef:
Also, since you have an Intel Mac, you should be able to install and run
the PowerPC version of FPC and Lazarus too and create PowerPC
executables without cross-compiling. One issue would be figuring out how
to install two versions of FPC since these file locations are
