On 8/28/06, Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should be aware that Qt 4 bindings for Free Pascal already exist
for many months now, and there is even a partially working Qt
interface for Lazarus Component Library.
This doesn't mean that it's easy to use, i.e. deriving your own
Using C++ libraries from other languages is either bloat or hard to use.
The problem of the C++ widget libraries is that they are meant to be used
directly, not to base a higher level widget set (like LCL) with an own set
of properties on them.
If you try that you end up actually working
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Using C++ libraries from other languages is either bloat or hard to use.
The problem of the C++ widget libraries is that they are meant to be used
directly, not to base a higher level widget set (like LCL) with an own set
of properties on them.
If you try that
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:00:03 +0200, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Using C++ libraries from other languages is either bloat or
hard to use.
C++ libraries hard to use?
Can you give me examples?
Try to make good and easy to use (object) pascal
J. Peter Mugaas wrote:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:00:03 +0200, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Using C++ libraries from other languages is either bloat or
hard to use.
C++ libraries hard to use?
Can you give me examples?
Try to make good and easy to
On 8/28/06, J. Peter Mugaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think QT would be easy at all.
You should be aware that Qt 4 bindings for Free Pascal already exist
for many months now, and there is even a partially working Qt
interface for Lazarus Component Library.
My feeling about GTK2 is that you probably should make the headers
dynamically load GTK2, determine the version, and with a thin wrapper, use
the appropriate widgets depending on version. I say that because there
are some depreciated widgets and newer widgets may not be in an older GTK
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 8/28/06, J. Peter Mugaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think QT would be easy at all.
You should be aware that Qt 4 bindings for Free Pascal already exist
for many months now, and there is even a partially working Qt
interface for Lazarus Component
Alexsander Rosa wrote:
Light? It reminds me FLTK:
Using C++ libraries from other languages is either bloat or hard to use.
http://www.fltk.org
2006/8/20, Aleš Katona [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And is already done...
And is crappy and slow...
Using C++ libraries from other languages is either bloat or hard to use.
In theory, many C++ libraries should be faster, in practice they're not.
This is due to the fact that many C++ developers are just to desperate to
start programming, skipping the design process.
Remember that Pascal was
Light? It reminds me FLTK:
http://www.fltk.org
2006/8/20, Aleš Katona [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And is already done...
And is crappy and slow...
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the
And is already done...
And is crappy and slow...
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
Graeme,
Does the widget also support Unicode and implementation of algorithms
such as Bi-Directional inside the components ?
Ido
On 8/19/06, Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The documentation will be online over the weekend.
As promised, the documenation for fpGUI (not complete)
On 8/19/06, ik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the widget also support Unicode and implementation of algorithms
such as Bi-Directional inside the components ?
Not yet. ;-)
I don't personally need Unicode support, so it is low on the priority
list, but it is on the list. :-)
Regards,
- Graeme
The documentation will be online over the weekend.
As promised, the documenation for fpGUI (not complete) is available on
the website at:
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/docs/
Regards,
- Graeme -
_
To unsubscribe: mail
Why not wxWidgets?
Linux map to GTK - GTK 2.0 alread done
Windows to Native widget set
Mac to Cocoa
Serious, I still dont undertande why not, is a licence issue?
[]s
Cesar Romero
http://blogs.liws.com.br/cesar
As promised, the documenation for fpGUI (not complete) is available on
the website
On 8/19/06, Cesar Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not wxWidgets?
Linux map to GTK - GTK 2.0 alread done
Windows to Native widget set
Mac to Cocoa
Serious, I still dont undertande why not, is a licence issue?
* I want it light-weight. The less dependancies the better. It then
makes for a
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Cesar Romero wrote:
Why not wxWidgets?
Linux map to GTK - GTK 2.0 alread done
Windows to Native widget set
Mac to Cocoa
Serious, I still dont undertande why not, is a licence issue?
Because no-one has started it yet.
And on Linux, I think it would be a very bad
Graeme's stuff is directly on top of X, which means 3 libraries less.
- Faster.
- Less resource usage.
- No workarounds for different quircks of different libraries
Not to mention the fact that wxWidgets is basicly the same thing as
LCL...
Ales
Not to mention the fact that wxWidgets is basicly the same thing as
LCL...
And is already done...
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
archives at
Am Samstag, 19. August 2006 17:48 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
* I want it to work identical on all platforms. By this I mean every
component - even to the point where if there was a bug under Windows
in the listview component, that bug should also be there for Linux
too. This may sound weird
.
Regards.
-Mensaje original-
De: Sebastian Kraft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Sábado, 19 de Agosto de 2006 01:03 p.m.
Para: lazarus@miraclec.com
Asunto: Re: Free Pascal widget set
Am Samstag, 19. August 2006 17:48 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
* I want it to work identical on all
On 8/19/06, Cesar Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to mention the fact that wxWidgets is basicly the same thing as
LCL...
And is already done...
With Free Pascal?
Graeme.
--
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
_
To
Am Samstag, 19. August 2006 20:08 schrieb Sergio Samayoa:
This is one reason why I'm looking forward to your widgetset. Write
once,
run
everywhere nowadays only works with some workarounds or quite simple
Thats not true.
You can get the same feel look and behavior with Java/Swing.
On 8/19/06, Sergio Samayoa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is one reason why I'm looking forward to your widgetset. Write once,
run
everywhere nowadays only works with some workarounds or quite simple
That's not true.
You can get the same feel look and behavior with Java/Swing.
Also, you can
25 matches
Mail list logo
