Okay gang, just got an e-mail from SourceForge about site changes. I think
it's really kickass that we can use http://leaf.sf.net now, but one thing
concerned me:
Since the download services have been ramped up to meet the evolving
needs of our project constituency, we will now be removing
On Thu, 17 May 2001, George Metz wrote:
Since the download services have been ramped up to meet the evolving
needs of our project constituency, we will now be removing project FTP
services and provide that additional bandwidth to the download servers.
The first phase of this removal process
George Metz, 2001-05-17 03:45 -0400
Okay gang, just got an e-mail from SourceForge about site changes. I
think it's really kickass that we can use http://leaf.sf.net now, but
one thing concerned me:
Since the download services have been ramped up to meet the evolving
needs of our project
George Metz wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
I'm also considering the use of GRUB, but I don't know where exactly
Out of curiosity, why would you want to use GRUB? Isn't that a little over
the top, even for Oxygen? What advantage would it give/disadvantage would
it
George Metz wrote:
Why I never went anywhere with mine was mostly because I sent out several
e-mails to this list, and the lack of a response was almost deafening in
it's silence. If I recall, not even you commented David. I assumed that
people had weighed the concept and decided it wasn't
Mike Noyes, 2001-05-17 06:25 -0700
David's Oxygen directory will need to move (David I'll take care of the
move for you).
David,
I copied your Oyxgen directory to:
/home/groups/l/le/leaf/devel/ddouthitt
Everyone,
I moved most of our content out of the anonymous ftp area.
ToDo:
Update
Mike Noyes, 2001-05-17 07:17 -0700
The following developers have files in the anonymous ftp area that will
eventually need to move into our web area.
snip
I'll create an admin task for this shortly. As soon as I know a timetable
for the move I'll update the task. Again, I apologize for any
Jonathan French, 2001-05-17 09:41 -0700
Hi Mike,
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub and leaf.sf.net/pub both seem to work
well.
Jonathan,
Thanks for checking. If we don't find any problems with my changes, I'll
ask the SF staff to remove the two remaining directory trees in our ftp
area on
Check the disk...
# ls -l oxygen3.ima
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1720320 May 17 12:25 oxygen3.ima
Try using the mkdosfs from the LRP package (Debian 2.1?):
# ./mkdosfs oxygen3.ima
./mkdosfs 0.3b (Yggdrasil), 5th May 1995 for MS-DOS FS
./mkdosfs: no disk geometry for this file size
David Douthitt wrote:
Pim van Riezen wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
I must say I've been surprised at all the excitement over Linux
2.4. I've noticed that all of you kernel wizards are scrambling to
get Linux 2.4 installed on LRP, while glibc 2.1 gets ignored.
For me,
On Thu, 17 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
Why I never went anywhere with mine was mostly because I sent out several
e-mails to this list, and the lack of a response was almost deafening in
it's silence. If I recall, not even you commented David. I assumed that
people had weighed the
Ewald Wasscher wrote:
David Douthitt wrote:
Pim van Riezen wrote:
if I want to produce binaries I'll have to use three different
environments if I want to cater for all glibc variations. Now that
RH7/glibc2.2 is gaining acceptance that'll be four:
libc5
Is anyone still using
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-17 22:33 +0200
Everybody,
I forget to mention that with *BSD you can check out the source code from
CVS and simply do something like:
root@mybsd:/usr/src # make world
And rebuild the entire system from scratch. I think that is so _very_
cool. That is one more reason
David Douthitt wrote:
I'd vote for 2.2. It may be bigger, but 2.1 will be unmaintained rather
soon I'm afraid. So when we choose for glibc 2.1 we might end up with
the same mess as we have for glibc 2.0 now in a year or so. Unless one
of us is capable of backporting security fixes 2.2 is the
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
Ewald,
Would this make it more difficult for us to track our changes to the
original tarballs?
That's fairly trivial to solve though; just do a cleanroom tree that
contains the original, as-released, unmodified source. Then you can diff
the cleanroom
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
New structure:
/home/groups/l/le/leaf/pub
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub
Thanks for all the work.
Dale.
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
16 matches
Mail list logo
