Mike Noyes wrote:
Everyone,
The last thing I did before disappearing for the last couple of
months, was to restructure our CVS repository. All developers now have
a personal tree in devel/yourname. There is a bin directory for
released files. The oxygen and dachstein trees are controlled
At 2002-01-07 11:07 +0100, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
The last thing I did before disappearing for the last couple of months,
was to restructure our CVS repository. All developers now have a personal
tree in devel/yourname. There is a bin directory for released files. The
oxygen
At 2002-01-07 12:32 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Would that 2.2 kernel be compatible with Dachstein? Do modules have
to be re-configured?
Yes, it's basically the 2.2.19 Dachstein kernel with the M-Systems DOC
patches applied.
Charles,
If you add DOC support to Dachstein, are you
I'd just like to introduce myself to the devel group.
My name is Lynn Avants, I have done admin. work w/Linux for a couple of years
now, some consulting with systems integration, and support for sites/groups
like Brainbuzz/Cramsession, Corel Linux, linuxjunior.org, linuxnewbie.org,
and
On 1/7/02 at 9:22 AM, Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The ash and glibc binaries came from Ewald, who I think
got it from David Douthitt.
The current version of busybox (0.60.2) contains ash. I've also added
a few patches of my own to busybox. I wondered if anyone else here
David Douthitt wrote:
snip
Interested? Are there Dachstein patches to busybox?
None that I know of. But POSIXness currently uses the ash getopts
builtin, so using busybox ash would either require enabling it in ash.c,
or some changes to POSIXness.
Ewald Wasscher.
