On Wednesday 10 July 2002 00:27, kitakura wrote:
Don't worry. I am following GPL .
Thank-you :-)
I'm looking forward to seeing IPNuts succeed,
and I appreciate your time and effort with my concerns.
--
~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn
guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
From: Jeff Newmiller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Richard Doyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copies to: Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Leaf-devel] Bering RC3 build with uClibc
Date sent: Tue, 9 Jul
Everyone,
Lynn found a way to ensure files are downloaded from cvs as binaries. He
changed the content type at the end of the ViewCVS download url to
application/octet-stream.
--
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/
Mike and I were discussing cvs off-list. Since much of this is
un-structured now, perhaps, we can impose some user-friendly and
consistent form on our cvs tree.
I am starting to realize that, perhaps, I should take a directory based
approach to helices' cvs tree.
I have not settled on any
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Mike and I were discussing cvs off-list. Since much of this is
un-structured now, perhaps, we can impose some user-friendly and
consistent form on our cvs tree.
A topic with a long history...
I am starting to realize that, perhaps, I should
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 13:01, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
David Douthitt has advocated (and it sounds good to me but I haven't done
it myself) a mechanism whereby sources obtained from other sources are
kept in original form and a parallel directory containing patchfiles and
compilation instructions
Hi,
I used with success the Simon Blake's instructions to upgrade Bering to
Glibc 2.2
I had a small problem and I found the solution by myself but I think I would
be usefull
to put some comments in the mailing list archive...
I built the initrd and root.lrp on a RedHat 7.3 running on a VmWare
Jeff Newmiller wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
[ snip ]
[1] Should I have separate trees for different underlying versions of
net-snmp? For example, I committed net-snmp v4.2.4. I am contemplating
building and committing both v4.2.5 and the totally different
Yes, I agree. However, I am dealing with somebody else's software and
making it suitable for leaf. Obviously, I can have several iterations
of net-snmp v4.2.4 that address various leaf concerns.
Also, I must be prepared for somebody else's version upgrades causing
problems that do not
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 15:39, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Under this scenario, committing to cvs directory structures, cvs is
responsible for knowing whether or not a specific file or directory
has changed? Any change, including mod/grp/own?
CVS doesn't track file permissions or
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 15:16, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Jeff Newmiller wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
[ snip ]
[1] Should I have separate trees for different underlying versions of
net-snmp? For example, I committed net-snmp v4.2.4. I am contemplating
Mike Noyes wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 15:16, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Jeff Newmiller wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
[1] Should I have separate trees for different underlying versions of
net-snmp? For example, I committed net-snmp v4.2.4. I am
Several months ago, Charles and I had an off-list discussion regarding
several dcd related issues. I know that he has his todo list, to which
I've contributed possible solutions; but, I also have issues with which
I've struggled on my own.
One thing that Charles and I want to do is remove all
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 17:41, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 15:16, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
CVS retains all previous versions of a file in the repository. You can
specify a specific version for retrieval.
Example:
Michael D. Schleif wrote:
[ snip ]
One thing that Charles and I want to do is remove all user configurable
parameters from all init scripts. To that end, I have reviewed all
/var/lib/lrpkg/*.conf, based on this list of packages that I use:
[ snip ]
My removal recommendations are based
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 19:41, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Yes, these are our (leaf) _cvs_ versions. However, how can a user
select net-snmp v4.2.4 when my net-snmp version is 1.1?
Well, the editor session that pops up during a commit can be avoided
with the -m text switch added to the
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 20:06, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Also, in standard dcd v1.0.2, what program uses /etc/rpc?
NFS and SUN login. I think a few people are using this style
of access on LEAF boxes.
--
~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn
guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
guitarlynn wrote:
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 20:06, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Also, in standard dcd v1.0.2, what program uses /etc/rpc?
NFS and SUN login. I think a few people are using this style
of access on LEAF boxes.
O, now I see it:
/etc/init.d/mountnfs.sh
OK, /etc/rpc
18 matches
Mail list logo
