On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 08:42:07AM +0200, Jacques Nilo wrote:
Georges:
If you do not feel confortable using Bering, please do not use it.
Bering has been developped by me and Eric as a hobby, on our spare time
outside of our regular jobs.
I do feel it is an innovative quality project. Please
Everyone,
Which of these export date commands is recommended method for exporting
the current tree. Is the quote nesting I used in the first example
technically correct? Both examples below appear to function as expected.
cvs -d:ext:mhnoyes@cvs1:/cvsroot/leaf -q export -D \
`date '+%Y-%m-%d %T
Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps they
won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few people *think*.
IANAL, I am a software engineer. I am also not an OSS zealot. My
philosophy tends more towards Cluetrain than anything else.
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002,
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 11:43, John Klar wrote:
Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps they
won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few people *think*.
[2] Pointing requestors to the upstream source is NOT good enough. The
distributor is required to
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 12:20, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 11:43, John Klar wrote:
Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps they
won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few people *think*.
[2] Pointing requestors to the upstream source
On Sunday 14 July 2002 14:20, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 11:43, John Klar wrote:
Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps
they won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few
people *think*.
[2] Pointing requestors to the upstream
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 13:16, Richard Doyle wrote:
Personally, I don't care whether sources are provided directly or
upstream as long as they are publicly accessible. Unfortunately, this is
not always the case for LEAF releases, which can include binaries
compiled from modified sources, where
