Re: [leaf-devel] git should not track conf/buildtool.conf globally

2015-10-15 Thread Andrew
Hi. Use buildtool.local instead. 15.10.2015 00:38, Erich Titl пишет: > Hi Folks > > stupid question... > > How do you avoid the following > > mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/bering-uclibc$ git status > Auf Branch maint > Ihr Branch ist auf dem selben Stand wie 'origin/maint'. > > Änderungen, die

[leaf-devel] apkg -u, the deception?

2015-10-15 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP > I also _believe_ , that integration of apkg -u into the upgrade script will > be > easier to accomplish the then smaller changes and more helpful, than reinvent > apkg and configdb. I have been thinking hard about this and I believe you are wrong in this aspect. Let me state why I

Re: [leaf-devel] apkg -u, the deception?

2015-10-15 Thread Erich Titl
Am 15.10.2015 um 20:17 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Hi Erich; > > Am Donnerstag, 15. Oktober 2015, 19:16:19 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Hi KP >> >> Am 15.10.2015 um 18:41 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: >>> Hi Erich; >> >> .. >> >>> No; we only need the new package with the AC1 and the AC', which is in >>>

Re: [leaf-devel] apkg -u, the deception?

2015-10-15 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Hi Erich; Am Donnerstag, 15. Oktober 2015, 08:27:56 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > > I also _believe_ , that integration of apkg -u into the upgrade script > > will be easier to accomplish the then smaller changes and more helpful, > > than reinvent apkg and configdb. > > I have been thinking

Re: [leaf-devel] apkg -u, the deception?

2015-10-15 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP Am 15.10.2015 um 18:41 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Hi Erich; > .. > > No; we only need the new package with the AC1 and the AC', which is in > configdb.lrp. > If you call apkg -u it will detect the changed file and it will offer you to > either Keep your version, Show differences, Edit