[leaf-devel] Fwd: making heyu.lrp ???

2014-03-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello list, Can someone help Jean-Roch with this package? I don't have a development environment at the moment. Thanks, Eric Begin forwarded message: *From:* jeanro...@users.sf.net *Date:* 8 maart 2014 04:24:23 CET *To:* espak...@users.sf.net *Subject:* *making heyu.lrp ???* *Reply-To:*

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: module options for auto-loading

2010-11-15 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Kp, That's it ;) Eric 2010/11/15 KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net Am Montag, 15. November 2010, 14:09:29 schrieb Eric Spakman: David, If I remember correctly, the option Check tainted module is needed. But I can't remember which modules needed it. Please check before

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Suggested Change to Default Configuration for dhcpcd

2010-10-26 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello David, The reason for that was that the dnsmasq is serving as dns server, it gets its upstream servers from /etc/dhcpc/resolv.conf See also: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/buci-dnsmasq3.html http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/buci-network3.html Eric 2010/10/25 davidMbrooke

Re: [leaf-devel] The packaging of Haserl.

2008-03-30 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Mats Erik, I have no objection in putting these binaries in a seperate package. Especially if it makes maintaining easier. Regards, Eric Hello folks, I will the next few days commit a major overhaul of Webconf, resulting in new versions of at least five webconf packages. The most

Re: [leaf-devel] Alpha Test File Server Add-On Packages - Where Should I Put Them?

2008-03-19 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi David, Very nice! NFS support indeed needs an uClibc change (which adds a lot of size), but LVM2 only needs a kernel module AFAIK so would be an easy one. Anyway, people who need NFS server support can create there own packages if they like with the provided documentation. The setup can be

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering uClibc with Kernel 2.6

2008-03-11 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi David, (2) with a 2.6 you can embed your whole file system into the kernel and boot and go just from the kernel -- no file system at all -- that way you don't have to pivot-root from the initrd -- just stay there. That's not correct. Indeed you can make a choice to include the initramfs

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering uClibc with Kernel 2.6

2008-03-11 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi David, (2) with a 2.6 you can embed your whole file system into the kernel and boot and go just from the kernel -- no file system at all -- that way you don't have to pivot-root from the initrd -- just stay there. I'm sort of fishing for stories about why that might be a bad idea,

Re: [leaf-devel] etc.local

2008-02-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, I understand your proposal, but it doesn't work reliable. The reason is that other packages explicitly include specific files in those directories. Adding a rule in etc.local to include all files could confuse the backup logic. I can understand this, although scheduling a

Re: [leaf-devel] etc.local

2008-02-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, The problem is that the sha1sums are calculated multiple times, it should work but gives some overhead and is not very clean. I see, the sha1sum files appear to be claculated on the contents of package.list, not on package.local, which holds files and directories to be backed up.

Re: [leaf-devel] etc.local

2008-02-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, The problem is that the sha1sums are calculated multiple times, it should work but gives some overhead and is not very clean. I see, the sha1sum files appear to be claculated on the contents of package.list, not on package.local, which holds files and directories to be backed up.

Re: [leaf-devel] Intel e1000 network drivers

2008-02-18 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, If the patched 7.6.15 e1000 driver works I will post the patch to the e1000 driver list. Still, where is it best placed here? I see my mess from the r1000 driver is still lying around in CVS :-( Just send it to me. For removing the previous mess ;-) we need some sourceforge

Re: [leaf-devel] xntp problem with busybox 1.8.2 (was dhcpcd still seems to malfunction in beta2a)

2008-01-07 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Strange, neither the version of ntpd or iptools has changed between the two betas and the initrd basicly only contains busybox. So I wonder what can cause this problem... besides an ntpd init script (busybox change in init applet?) or a busybox command used in the ntp scripts.. Eric

Re: [leaf-devel] xntp problem with busybox 1.8.2 (was dhcpcd still seems to malfunction in beta2a)

2008-01-07 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or did you compile your own? Eric Strange, neither the version of ntpd or iptools has changed between the two betas and the initrd basicly only contains busybox. Yes, strange indeed, I just looked at .config

Re: [leaf-devel] RTL8111B driver

2007-04-05 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Let me know if you run into pb's. Indeed I am running into problems. My sources are currntly at /home/mega/leaf/bering-uclibc/devel/latest/src/bering-uclibc/buildtool/sou rce I am using cvs -z3 -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/leaf/src/apps import r1000/buildtool.cfg

Re: [leaf-devel] RTL8111B driver

2007-04-05 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Mike, Erich, Disregard my last post. You omitted a path 'bering-uclibc' from the import command. http://leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/leaf/src/bering-uclibc/apps/ The correct path is: leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/leaf/src/bering-uclibc/contrib/ Eric

Re: [leaf-devel] libstdc++

2007-03-05 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Natanael, Hi Mike, Everyone, Tom just asked about libstdc++ for embedded use on the shorewall-devel list. I wasn't able to find a package for that in our package repository with a cursory look. Do we have a libstdc++ package? We do have a package containing libstdc++: libcxx.lrp But

Re: [leaf-devel] libstdc++

2007-03-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Mike, Everyone, Tom just asked about libstdc++ for embedded use on the shorewall-devel list. I wasn't able to find a package for that in our package repository with a cursory look. Do we have a libstdc++ package? We do have a package containing libstdc++: libcxx.lrp But the library is

Re: [leaf-devel] libstdc++

2007-03-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Mike, Eric, Thanks for the information. If I have this straight, either choice is about the same resource wise. microperl 350 kbytes libstdc++ more than 400 kbyte Not entirely, the microperl package (tar.gz) is 350 kbyte (without probably needed modules) the microperl binary is 930

Re: [leaf-devel] rt2400

2007-02-27 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, This is always of interest, please send the patch. Eric Hi folks I added the rt2400 module to the ralink directory. I have a patch for ralink if this should be of interest. cheers Erich - Take

Re: [leaf-devel] Perl

2007-02-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Mike, On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 11:11, Tom Eastep wrote: If you find one that looks promising, let me know. I assume that it will be limited in some way but I'm used to programming to the greatest common denominator. Tom, It looks like OpenWrt and NSLU2-Linux have microperl ipkg builds

Re: [leaf-devel] Perl

2007-02-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Mike, Everyone, It looks like there are some embedded distributions that successfully built relatively small perl packages. See: CPAN/Ports http://www.cpan.org/ports/ Maybe we can glean useful information from existing binary builds to generate our own package. I don't see a lot of

Re: [leaf-devel] Oops

2007-01-06 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, As I mentioned a few days ago, I've, err, borrowed, yeah, that's the word, Bering uClibc as a base for a boot floppy I need to install my LFS installation on new boxes from a CD or file server. So I've hacked it a bit to simplify things I didn't need (self-maintainability, etc.),

Re: [leaf-devel] ipt_CONNMARK.o

2006-12-19 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, I just checked rc1 and it's in the modules tarball: 2.4.33\kernel\net\ipv4\netfilter\ipt_CONNMARK.o Eric It looks like ipt_CONNMARK.o is not in the Bering*_modules.tgz file in the iso image. Can we please get this in as part of the standard build before shipping 3.0? It's needed

Re: [leaf-devel] ulogd does not use new logfile after rotation

2006-12-01 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Both logfiles (shorewall.log and ulogd.log), served by ulogd are rotated by there own cron scripts. ulogd.log once a week and shorewall. log every day. In both cron scripts ulogd is reloaded. Using different logrotation methods is IMHO not very reasonable. I am not using shorewall

Re: [leaf-devel] ulogd does not use new logfile after rotation

2006-12-01 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Using different logrotation methods is IMHO not very reasonable. I am not using shorewall for my big production systems and just added the snip I think I know what is going wrong. You're not using shorewall, why do you use ulogd? Ulogd is used exclusively for shorewall, so if

Re: [leaf-devel] ulogd does not use new logfile after rotation

2006-12-01 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, The correct place to change this is the ulogd cron.daily file, lrp.conf is for configuration of the logfiles served by syslogd. I will look for an option to pass the ulogd.conf logfile parameters to the cron.daily script, so this will handled automatically (like done in mhttpd).

Re: [leaf-devel] ulogd does not use new logfile after rotation

2006-11-30 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Both logfiles (shorewall.log and ulogd.log), served by ulogd are rotated by there own cron scripts. ulogd.log once a week and shorewall. log every day. In both cron scripts ulogd is reloaded. Eric Hi Folks again, I should learn to change subject, sorry in my attempt to move to

Re: [leaf-devel] small glitch in ssh/scp in bering-uClibc

2006-11-29 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Starting with bering-uclibc3.x I observed an error when trying to use ssh/scp. debug2: calling socket with 10 , 1 , 6 socket: Address family not supported by protocol This is due to the fact that the socket call is using an address family of inetv6 by default. is this really

Re: [leaf-devel] QBox - Back under active development

2006-11-29 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Ron, The nice thing about Bering-uClibc-3.0 is that you don't need to tune the packages but only have to touch the configdb.lrp and moddb.lrp to have a different configuration. An other nice thing is that you can create an lwp web plugin specific for QOS use, given it a specific

Re: [leaf-devel] QBox - Back under active development

2006-11-29 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, Ron, One of the things I always bitch about here (and unfortunately don't help enough with) is improving on exactly this thing -- the packaging and installation of B-U along with the dev environment. If you feel the same way, it would be totally cool if you would be willing to take

Re: [leaf-devel] ez-ipupdate?

2006-11-23 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, There is no reason for it, that's why it's just available ;-) http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/index.php?module=pagemasterPAGE_user_op=view_pagePAGE_id=12MMN_position=32:32 ezipupd.lrp Eric Is there a reason the ez-ipupdate package for 3.x isn't in the packages 3.x list?

Re: [leaf-devel] Documentation in Shorewall Configuration Files

2006-11-23 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, What troubles me more is that Tom updates the documentation on his site to represent the state of the art in shorewall v5, and the currently shipping versions of LEAF or BU are using shorewall v3, our documentation will not match the code we're shipping. snip There is no

Re: [leaf-devel] Documentation in Shorewall Configuration Files

2006-11-23 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Mike, Ok, but back to the documentation issue. BU will always use the latest stable shorewall version and even with an older version of BU it shouldn't be a big problem to update to the latest shorewall (especially 3.0 onwards). Why duplicate the shorewall documentation on the LEAF

Re: [leaf-devel] xl2tpd does not compile

2006-10-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Are you sure you're using the latest checkout of apps/linux? The linux/if_pppol2tp.h file is part of the pppol2tp-linux-2.4.27.patch.gz patch in the linux CVS directory. Eric Hi Folks it appears that the xl2tpd package as distributed on CVs does not compile. The makefile uses

Re: [leaf-devel] xl2tpd does not compile

2006-10-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Are you sure you're using the latest checkout of apps/linux? The linux/if_pppol2tp.h file is part of the pppol2tp-linux-2.4.27.patch.gz patch in the linux CVS directory. I have not seen that patch in my linux directory, so it is very possible that it is not up to latest level. I

Re: [leaf-devel] xl2tpd does not compile

2006-10-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, How do you guys handle to have your own workspace and still keep up with CVS. buildtool does not appear to be the solution for this. It's not really meant for it. We don't really have our own workspace, CVS head is our workspace. But why do you need your own workspace? Do you

Re: [leaf-devel] initial 3.0 beta feedback

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, Just my random notes. I built a leaf flash from scratch using pxeboot on a spare box using the CVS .lrp packages diff.lrp is not being built? Diff is part of busybox and included. a port of traceroute would be a good thing (feedback from burning man) ditto iperf Iperf is pretty

Re: [leaf-devel] patch: enable traceroute in busybox

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, I don't want to enable traceroute in busybox, because it don't work out of the box with shorewall and it adds size. Traceroute can also be done from any host connected. I rather have a separate traceroute package. Eric ? busybox-1.2.1 Index: .config

Re: [leaf-devel] dynamic generation of dropbear keys if not present

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, Good idea, will take a look. Eric Please consider applying this patch to dropbear. It will dynamically create the dropbear host key files if they don't exist. This is EXTREMELY useful for bringup from scratch. If you don't have access to the serial port, at least you can ssh into

Re: [leaf-devel] dynamic modules building idea

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, Sounds interesting, but you can also unpack the modules tarball on one of the storage media, mount it and load the modules directly from there (some examples in the /etc/modules file). But I like this idea, it's very easy this way to create or update a moddb on a running system.

Re: [leaf-devel] example 'build modules' engine...

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, A few comments: -We do have tar -X, so you can use that. Take a look at the apkg upgrade code for an example. -The hardcoded name of the modules repository is somewhat ugly, maybe you can do something with uname to find the kernel version. Eric Here's what I was talking about... this

Re: [leaf-devel] initial 3.0 beta feedback

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, should we be saving /var/lib/random-seed in configdb? Ok, understand the question. Yes, it should be saved ;-) Eric - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done

Re: [leaf-devel] patch: enable traceroute in busybox

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, Speaking of busybox, I noticed that you're linking busybox to its linked commands with symbolic links instead of hardlinks. Using hardlinks should be more memory and space efficient *if* using a symbolic link takes up an inode in the filesystem in memory/on disk. Unfortunately, my

Re: [leaf-devel] yet another functionality request for 3.0 - ancillary file storage .lrp

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, The 2.x distribution had one particularly nice feature that I'd like to see reimplemented in 3.x. From the looks of it, saving the config currently only checks the collection of config files enumerated in /var/lib/lrpkg/*.config. Nope, it checks the sha1sums of the files listed in

Re: [leaf-devel] runtime fixup of /etc/inittab for serial consoles

2006-09-05 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, Sorry for the delay getting back to you, just got back from a week on the playa lighting up dust storms with 2.4 and 5.8ghz wifi... :-) ;-) The reason I'm not really enthusiastic about this idea is that it adds a new dependency between sylinux, initrd and the etc package and also

Re: [leaf-devel] latest cvs checkout does not compile

2006-08-28 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, It's probably your version of jade. Try to change libusb buildtool.mk file like this: Change: ./configure) to ./configure --disable-build-docs) Eric Hi Maybe I blew it again, altough I thought upgrading my development environment was easy - I checked out the latest cvs

Re: [leaf-devel] latest cvs checkout does not compile

2006-08-28 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, It's probably your version of jade. Most probably. I did not run buildenv this time, is there a new version of jade built in the buildenv? No, this source uses jade from your hostsystem if it exists. It probably exists on your system and found by libusb's configure script. But

Re: [leaf-devel] Shorewall 3.3.0

2006-08-28 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Tom, That's great news! Thank you very much! Eric Spakman I have opened up the 3.3 development thread. http://www1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/development/3.3/shorewall-3.3.0 ftp://ftp1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/development/3.3/shorewall-3.3.0 The two major changes in 3.3.0 when

Re: [leaf-devel] runtime fixup of /etc/inittab for serial consoles

2006-08-27 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, What it saves them from having to do is hand mess with etc.lrp on a second system the very first time they load the flash. There is absolutly no need for that. We will release some specific configdb packages for certain types of hardware, so it's just a matter of copying the right

Re: [leaf-devel] webconf backup packages

2006-08-26 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Kp, Hi; thx - I'm running latest from cvs and see: grep: /etc/init.d/init.d: No such file or directory grep: /etc/init.d/init.d: No such file or directory At the end of various (each?) daemon description - e.g. dnsmasq. I don't think this is intended. Did you also used the latest

Re: [leaf-devel] runtime fixup of /etc/inittab for serial consoles

2006-08-26 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, Hmmm, not sure. I find it a bit of a clutch. What happens if an user edit the inittab for other changes like mgetty? I prefer specific configdb/sylinux.cfg for different hardware where also other changes can be done. Eric --Apple-Mail-3-25159442 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;

Re: [leaf-devel] runtime fixup of /etc/inittab for serial consoles

2006-08-26 Thread Eric Spakman
to fix if they don't have a linux system handy. I would call it, or hook it into /var/lib/lrpkg/root.whatever that script is called that gets executed before /sbin/init. The script that loads all the packages at boot time... On Aug 26, 2006, at 1:49 AM, Eric Spakman wrote: Hi Paul, Hmmm

Re: [leaf-devel] runtime fixup of /etc/inittab for serial consoles

2006-08-26 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, Not if it's not. You're the software developer, you make the distribution etc.lrp. The whole point of this thing is to get people running with a working console. Once they're on their feet, i.e. if they edit the /etc/inittab or do a backup after the real inittab is working,

Re: [leaf-devel] webconf backup packages

2006-08-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Nathan, Thank you very much! Hi Eric, I just posted the source and binary versions of webconf.lrp and webconf.lwp. Your changes to lrcfg.back.cgi were heroic. :))) I decided to shortcut the whole thing and make webconf (backup, at least) work with Bering uClibc *only*. (Since

Re: [leaf-devel] new config/backup system

2006-08-21 Thread Eric Spakman
dep=`find_lrp_that_has_file $so` add_dependency $dep done done So you shouldn't need to figure out all dependencies by hand. Ok, thanks! That should be easy implementable in buildtool. -- Natanael Copa Eric Spakman

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-07-18 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Mike, Op Di, 18 juli, 2006 5:25 pm schreef David Douthitt: Mike Noyes wrote: Everyone, We need to release source tarballs in the SF FRS with our binaries. How does this affect distributions that are not being actively maintained? I agree with Luis, though - the storage requirements

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-07-18 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Mike, KP, My interpretation of Stallman's comments leads me to believe those sources are considered up-stream. I hope I'm wrong. My interpretation: If you release binaries, you must maintain source availability for three years. You may not rely on other projects to do

Re: [leaf-devel] new config system

2006-07-15 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Cedric, No, it is already listed in image/fd/filelist The ISO simply contains all packages found in $PKGDIR (no hard wired list) Ok, so an exception should be made for the moddb package. Here is my patch to add moddb.lrp in bootdisk.ima and hide it from the ISO :

Re: [leaf-devel] new config system

2006-07-14 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Cedric, Hello list, With new config system, only one instance of a package is installed, the last one from PKGPATH sources. That is coherent with packages not splitted anymore between pristine and local. On the other hand, if PKGPATH=floppy,cdrom and there is moddb.lrp on both, the

Re: [leaf-devel] new config system

2006-07-14 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Cedric, There shouldn't be 2 modules databases installed. Yes. So for a cdrom/floppy distrib, the standard moddb used for the first boot should be already on the floppy and no moddb should exist on the iso. Correct, ofcourse you can have an unpacked modules repository on the CD, which can

Re: [leaf-devel] new config system

2006-07-14 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Cedric, Correct, ofcourse you can have an unpacked modules repository on the CD, which can be used by mounting it and setting the path in /etc/ modules. That's what I do but it doesn't work with modules loaded by init.d scripts (ipsec, gpio) Yes, I think the same is true for pcmcia. It

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-10 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, The problem on the shorewall site is solved now, the www.shorewall.net link works correct again. Cheers, Eric Op Zo, 9 juli, 2006 11:40 am schreef Erich Titl: Hi Eric Eric Spakman wrote: Hi Erich, I think it's a temporary problem on shorewall's main site. I will keep an eye

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi everybody, some of you may have seen my odyssey getting a buildenv for uClibc up and running. With lots of help and patience by Eric Spakman I finally got the CVS HEAD to compile without barfing on my SuSE 9.2 . Now the 2.4.2 tagged release is not as gentle, as it still contains some

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Thank you, I will fetch them probably tonight and have them run. I believe though, that after these modifications it is in the best interest to tag these files as 2.4.3 and release them accordingly, as _they_were_modified_ What do you think? The changes in buildtool don't

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, I will download the current 2.4.2 tonight and see how it runs on my environment. Thanks! Eric - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, I think it's a temporary problem on shorewall's main site. I will keep an eye on it and change to an other site if the problem persist. Thanks for reporting. Eric Eric Eric Spakman wrote: Hi Erich, I will download the current 2.4.2 tonight and see how it runs on my

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-06 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Erich, I tought about the same, but the strange thing is that HOST_COMPILE is empty with the latest commit and $CC points to the crosscompiler (the 2.4.2 tag should be set to current HEAD). But I will take a look at it this evening. Erc Hello following up to my compile problems with

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-05 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, I will take a look at it, although I can't remember seeing this in my test... Eric Eric some more information. Although wlan-ng appears to compile correctly, not all is well in config.mk CROSS_COMPILE=/data/leaf/bering-uclibc/devel/latest/src/bering-uclibc/bui

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Did you checkout the contrib section in CVS also? The directory setserial seems to be missing in the path below: /home/mega/leaf/bering-uclibc/devel/2.4.2/src/bering-uclibc/contrib/buildtool.cfg The setserial setup is an user added setup, so I can't say a lot about it. Although with a

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, The directory setserial seems to be missing in the path below: /home/mega/leaf/bering-uclibc/devel/2.4.2/src/bering-uclibc/contrib/buil dtool.cfg sure, I did not want to update this before I was certain, but the problem appears to be in a corrupted sources.cfg, where the setserial

Re: [leaf-devel] Docs

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Paul, I fully agree, but unfortuanatly I can't do anything about it. I hope Mike can give the status of PDF (and/or HTML) generation. Eric -- Eric Spakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Paul, AFAIK pdf generation is still not ready... But you can checkout the XML document

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Buildtool checks the link to the right uClibc loader when you start it (either 0.9.20 or 0.9.28), it's not possible to do two simultanious builds for two different environments. So don't ;)) But these are unrelated processes, with unrelated buildtool perl sources, libraries and

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Not entirely, some sources are broken upstream for crosscompiling and expect the loader to be in /lib (hardcoded). ooops... OK, may I suggest to add this to the docs :-) It already is in the docs ;-) http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/bk07ch02s02.html last alinea, the process is

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, This is very well possible, I seem to remember that I fixed something like this some time ago. Maybe after the 2.4.2 tag :-) In indeed did: source.cfg Revision 1.112 in CVS Boooh another one in building kernel snip I have 2 builds running at the same time, one for

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Op Di, 4 juli, 2006 3:31 pm schreef Erich Titl: Eric feels like a never ending story, herre the latest from the HEAD checkout snip -D__LINUX_WLAN__ ../shared/p80211types.c ../shared/p80211metamsg.c ../shared/p80211metamib.c ../shared/p80211meta.c mkmetadef.c ../shared/p80211types.c

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, snip The problem is in the linux-wlan-ng-0.2.3 directory, where CC is redefined in config.mk luna grep /usr/bin/cc * config.mk:HOST_CC=$(HOST_COMPILE)/usr/bin/cc config.mk:CC=/data/leaf/bering-uclibc/devel/latest/src/bering-uclibc/build tool/staging/usr/bin//usr/bin/cc

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, I just checked-in a slightly different version of wlan-ng's buildtool.mk, this is more in line with other sources. Can you check this one to see if it solves your problem? Eric Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with

Re: [leaf-devel] Docs

2006-07-03 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Paul, AFAIK pdf generation is still not ready... But you can checkout the XML document files from CVS: http://leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/leaf/doc/guide/ Eric I went looking around the site for downloadable copies of the manuals for Bering-uClibc. I found a link to a supposed PDF at the

Re: [leaf-devel] new tagged 2.4.2

2006-07-02 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Andrea, Hi to all, I successfully built a leaf bering uclibc usb stick with this tagged branch. I have now a working dropbear in a via mobo. some things: 1) when I built the initrd package, I got an error, because busybox was configured without mkfs minix. I did enable it in the

Re: [leaf-devel] new tagged 2.4.2

2006-07-02 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, I don't know enough of CVS to see what goes wrong. You can try a fresh checkout of buildtool in a different directory. EricS Eric Eric Spakman wrote: ... Instead of using the tagged 2.4.2 with uClibc-0.9.20, why not use the latest in CVS with 0.9.28? Tried to update buildenv

Re: [leaf-devel] beckup menu disappered

2006-06-30 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Andrea, Hi all, I have recently rebuilt the leaf bering base package (yesterday 29 june), to test some modifications I did to the bristuff/asterisk package, and see if all go nicely with the new uclibc buildenv recently commited. Well, when I go to the backup menu of this box, I got:

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Mike, If you provide software to download the source then the link it points to _must_not_be_altered_. This is pretty sensible. Eric, That's the way I understood things also (linking to up-stream source was permissible when distributing unmodified binaries), but DSL and MEPIS were

Re: [leaf-devel] openswan fix

2006-06-29 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Nataneal, I looked at the link and it appears to be a very old bug. So its fixed in newer versions of openswan? No, the version used by Bering-uClibc is 2.4.5 which is the latest stable version released only a few weeks ago and still has the bug. Eric Using Tomcat but need to do

Re: [leaf-devel] apkg -u (upgrade)

2006-06-29 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Cedric, Very interesting! I still have some problems understanding how it exactly works ;) Why is the following piece added? else tar -zxpf $pth create_sha1 $pkg fi Regards Eric I've implemented a simple upgrade command for apkg : non

Re: [leaf-devel] apkg -u (upgrade)

2006-06-29 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Cedric, To reply to myself, I understand. If the package has no config files it can just be installed. A possible problem with this implementation is that programs that are running (like daemons) are not stopped before and started after and upgrade. I still have some problems

Re: [leaf-devel] apkg -u (upgrade)

2006-06-29 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Cedric, A possible problem with this implementation is that programs that are running (like daemons) are not stopped before and started after and upgrade. Yes, we'd need some kind of preinst/postinst script to handle that. Or look for an init.d file in the package, like done in

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-29 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello David, I'm not sure about other LEAF distributions, but the Bering-uClibc distro has all sources, patches and config files of all programs in Sourceforge's CVS. There may be a few ones linked from other sites, but they can be added to CVS if needed. But I do think that it may affect some

Re: [leaf-devel] openswan fix

2006-06-28 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Cedric, Thanks for your fix! I will commit it to CVS and also update the current ipsec package in CVS. Regards, Eric Issuing the command ipsec auto --status while there is no tunnel will trigger a uclibc only bug in openswan (it blindly mallocs 0 bytes) more info at

Re: [leaf-devel] openswan fix

2006-06-28 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Natanael, Issuing the command ipsec auto --status while there is no tunnel will trigger a uclibc only bug in openswan (it blindly mallocs 0 bytes) does it affect openswan on a 2.6 kernel too? It looks like it, the malloc problem is in an openswan userspace tool and has to do with a

Re: [leaf-devel] mknod and .lwp

2006-06-27 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Andrea, I did find the webconf sources in source/webconf ? But I still don't understand in which way these files that I found on a bering uclib image are created: webconf.lwp keyboard.lwp dropbear.lwp They are created by the buildlrps script in

Re: [leaf-devel] Buildtool and buildenv

2006-06-18 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Erich, I want to make a small modification in the kernel configuration. What directory will these changes be made in, as it is neither in apps nor contrib. Basically the sources reside in $BUILDROOT/source/linux/ the mods are done using menuconfig, which will make a modified .config

Re: [leaf-devel] Buildtool and buildenv

2006-06-18 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Erich, A few questions before I dig deeper in the Bering uClibc stuff - after a ./buildtool.pl build kernel, where does the upx compressed kernel image go? Is it $BUILDROOT/buildtool/source/linux/linux/arch/i386/boot/bzlinux It goes to $BUILDROOT/buildtool/build/kernel/ I looked

Re: [leaf-devel] Buildtool and buildenv

2006-06-18 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Erich, How are the dependencies handled by buildtool? Is this done by flag files? In sources.cfg. If some source depends on an other source, it's listed in sources.cfg as a dependency. Eric ___ leaf-devel mailing list

Re: [leaf-devel] Buildtool and buildenv

2006-06-18 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Erich, The setup of linux and kernel is unlike other packages split in two different setups because the linux source/headers are needed for buildenv and buildenv is needed for building the kernel. That is probably the part I am missing. What are the linux kernel sources needed for in

Re: [leaf-devel] Buildtool and buildenv

2006-06-18 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Hmmm... why would I have to rebuild the buildenv? AFAIK Andreas Steffen has just added some functionality to the *swan, just like openswan. I will have to look a bit deeper. You may need the strongswan kernel headers to properly build strongswan. It's a bit subtle, you could go ahead

Re: [leaf-devel] Buildtool and buildenv

2006-06-18 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Hmmm... why would I have to rebuild the buildenv? AFAIK Andreas Steffen has just added some functionality to the *swan, just like openswan. I will have to look a bit deeper. To be somewhat clearer, I rebuilt buildenv not for gcc/uClibc itself but more to be sure all the headers are

Re: [leaf-devel] buildenv

2006-06-16 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Cedric, Hello list, I'd like to start working on updating buildenv to uclibc 0.9.28 so I have some questions : Is there someone already working on this ? If yes, what can I do to help ? The Bering-uClibc team has all the changes necessary for an upgrade ready, both in buildenv and

Re: [leaf-devel] New config/backup system

2006-06-12 Thread Eric Spakman
are incompatible, the question is if a 3-way diff tool works. Anyway, with this new config system you only have to diff one package (the configdb) instead of each and every package. Regards, Cedric Regards, Eric 2006/6/11, Eric Spakman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello list, The Bering-uClibc

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd + wpa2 + madwifi_ng = broken

2006-06-12 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Paul, The second problem is probably a madwifi driver bug or an inability of the CM9 card. I was trying to run WPA with CCMP (AES in CBC mode) as one of the available cyphers. (hostapd was configured to allow ccmp as well as tkip). My Mac was working fine, but my wife's PC was

Re: [leaf-devel] New config/backup system

2006-06-12 Thread Eric Spakman
Op Ma, 12 juni, 2006 10:26 am schreef Cédric Schieli: I have an image I can send you this evening (UTC) when I'm home. If there is more demand, maybe it can be placed somewhere on the LEAF site. I'll be there ;) Ok :)) Not yet, it depends on everyones free time ;)) The move to a new

  1   2   >