Jacques NIlo wrote:
How about deciding to call leaf stuff leaf
and not lrp anymore?
.lrp files
lrp all over sourceforge documents.
Perhaps we could make use of a change of the suffix in
the package names
to make a distinction between the older lrp packages
and a
Matt Schalit wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles,
For Dachenstein, not having set it up yet myself. Perhaps a specific menu item to
back up the ssh keys...
hThat just doesn't sound right. Well, I'll post it anyway to generate
thought.
-sp
How about deciding to call leaf
How about deciding to call leaf stuff leaf
and not lrp anymore?
.lrp files
lrp all over sourceforge documents.
Perhaps we could make use of a change of the suffix in
the package names
to make a distinction between the older lrp packages
and a new new more
featurefull leaf
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] [dachstein] feature add
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles,
For Dachenstein, not having set it up yet myself. Perhaps a specific
menu item to back up the ssh keys... h
At 2002-01-14 23:12 -0800, Matt Schalit wrote:
How about deciding to call leaf stuff leaf
and not lrp anymore?
.lrp files
lrp all over sourceforge documents.
45 hits for Linux Router Project
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Linux+Router+Project%22+site%3Aleaf.source
forge.net
523
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles,
For Dachenstein, not having set it up yet myself. Perhaps a specific menu item to
back up the ssh keys...
hThat just doesn't sound right. Well, I'll post it anyway to generate
thought.
-sp
How about deciding to call leaf stuff leaf
and
