Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps they
won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few people *think*.
IANAL, I am a software engineer. I am also not an OSS zealot. My
philosophy tends more towards Cluetrain than anything else.
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002,
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 11:43, John Klar wrote:
Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps they
won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few people *think*.
[2] Pointing requestors to the upstream source is NOT good enough. The
distributor is required to
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 12:20, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 11:43, John Klar wrote:
Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps they
won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few people *think*.
[2] Pointing requestors to the upstream source
On Sunday 14 July 2002 14:20, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 11:43, John Klar wrote:
Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps
they won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few
people *think*.
[2] Pointing requestors to the upstream
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 13:16, Richard Doyle wrote:
Personally, I don't care whether sources are provided directly or
upstream as long as they are publicly accessible. Unfortunately, this is
not always the case for LEAF releases, which can include binaries
compiled from modified sources, where
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 15:45, guitarlynn wrote:
On Monday 08 July 2002 08:55, Mike Noyes wrote:
Corporate Affiliates proposal:
I'd like us to start affiliating with corporations. However, I'm
unsure of the point where we should consider a company for
affiliation. Do they need
I definitely have opinions on all of this but have been waiting to see the response
from others as I am the most junior involved.
From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 7/12/2002 10:31 AM
I'm not proposing certification by our project of
On Friday 12 July 2002 12:31, Mike Noyes wrote:
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 15:45, guitarlynn wrote:
Lynn,
Thanks for the feedback. :-)
I was hoping these proposals would generate more discussion than they
have. I'd really appreciate additional feedback from our project
members. I don't want to
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 00:27, kitakura wrote:
Don't worry. I am following GPL .
Thank-you :-)
I'm looking forward to seeing IPNuts succeed,
and I appreciate your time and effort with my concerns.
--
~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn
guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
But when webadmin is upgraded, a license may change.
I'm sorry to hear this, but those that write the code usually get to
choose the license.
Don't worry. It is a far future.
# I'm developing kernel 2.4. It is going to use the linuxrc
code of Bering.
Great. Is there an
First of all, I would like to thank-you, kitakura, for updating us
on your project and clarifying any assumptions that I made based
on what little information I interpreted from various websites. TY :-)
I offer my apologies for any false information/assumptions that I may
have made!
On Monday
# I'm developing kernel 2.4. It is going to use the linuxrc code of
Bering. # I am thankful to many developers.
This is where I was really concerned. Are you using Bering and/or
Dachstein IDE code for "sale-only" products that do not have open
code equivilents (ie... floppy-only free
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 06:55, Mike Noyes wrote:
rc.firewall
This site is unavailable, and there hasn't been a new release in a
while. Does anyone know what the rcf development status is?
Everyone,
Steven just informed me this site is up and running again. I'm reviewing
the rcf-devel
On Monday 08 July 2002 08:55, Mike Noyes wrote:
Mosquito
From what I was able to glean from babelfish, it looks like
Mosquito was purchased by a VPN company (SeSame), renamed to IPnuts,
and was taken commercial. Does anyone have information on Mosquito
development status?
On Monday 08 July 2002 08:55, Mike Noyes wrote:
Mosquito
From what I was able to glean from babelfish, it looks like
Mosquito was purchased by a VPN company (SeSame), renamed to IPnuts,
and was taken commercial. Does anyone have information on Mosquito
development status?
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 17:26, kitakura wrote:
On Monday 08 July 2002 08:55, Mike Noyes wrote:
Mosquito
From what I was able to glean from babelfish
Kitakura,
It is nice to hear from you again. :-)
Mosquito changed the name to IPnuts 3.4.
Then it was just a name change not a
16 matches
Mail list logo
