Hi,
i spent my last two weeks in playing around with my gcc again, and made a
first test version of a text/menu based version of a config frontend for lrp
(it currently works for my version for kernel 2.4, based on lrp 2.9.8 and
soon uClibc).
For now it just configures the stuff in the
i spent my last two weeks in playing around with my gcc again, and made a
first test version of a text/menu based version of a config frontend for
lrp
(it currently works for my version for kernel 2.4, based on lrp 2.9.8 and
soon uClibc).
For now it just configures the stuff in the
At 2002-01-03 17:42 +0100, arne @ loopback . org wrote:
i spent my last two weeks in playing around with my gcc again, and made a
first test version of a text/menu based version of a config frontend for lrp
(it currently works for my version for kernel 2.4, based on lrp 2.9.8 and
soon uClibc).
arne @ loopback . org wrote:
Hi,
i spent my last two weeks in playing around with my gcc again, and made a
first test version of a text/menu based version of a config frontend for lrp
(it currently works for my version for kernel 2.4, based on lrp 2.9.8 and
soon uClibc).
I've been playing with
I do like the idea. But I wonder if it will be worth the extra space
this takes when we switch to a decent libc finally (if ever). But of
course you are using uClibc. BTW, while we are at it, Charles, how
do you feel about a uClibc based version of Dachstein? I've been playing
with this
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
I do like the idea. But I wonder if it will be worth the extra space
this takes when we switch to a decent libc finally (if ever). But of
course you are using uClibc. BTW, while we are at it, Charles, how
do you feel about a uClibc based version of Dachstein?
arne @ loopback . org wrote:
Hi,
i spent my last two weeks in playing around with my gcc
again, and made a
first test version of a text/menu based version of a config
frontend for lrp
(it currently works for my version for kernel 2.4, based on
lrp 2.9.8 and
soon uClibc).
I've been
Richard Doyle wrote:
snip
Eric Anderson is still maintaining it. I also don't know how to evaluate
the security of uClibc, as opposed to glibc.
I've seen others asking about this too, and I've been wondering about
this myself. I wouldn't know how it compares to a recent glibc, but
compared
On 1/3/02 at 5:42 PM, arne @ loopback . org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
... but it should be clear that this
will only work with configuration files NOT containing
anything else than configuration keys-value pairs and
comments (and no shell script functions like dachstein had
in previous
