Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 18:59:56 schrieb Martin Hejl:
> Hi kp,
>
> > the mailing list archive on SF is not up to date. The last archived
> > messages for leaf-user is Feb 23th. Are there any known issues? SF status
> > does not show a pb related to mailing list archives.
>
> I've opened a tracke
Hi kp,
> the mailing list archive on SF is not up to date. The last archived messages
> for leaf-user is Feb 23th. Are there any known issues? SF status does not
> show a pb related to mailing list archives.
I've opened a tracker - see
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=16
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 04:46, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> the mailing list archive on SF is not up to date. The last archived messages
> for leaf-user is Feb 23th. Are there any known issues? SF status does not
> show a pb related to mailing list archives.
KP,
If site status doesn't show a problem,
Hi all;
the mailing list archive on SF is not up to date. The last archived messages
for leaf-user is Feb 23th. Are there any known issues? SF status does not
show a pb related to mailing list archives.
kp
-
Take Surveys.
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > When you umount a /dev/ram* device, is the memory essentially free and
> > returned to the standard free pool? Or are some resources still used
> > by it?
>
> I've seen reports you have to run freeramdisk, but I have yet to verify
> this. NOTE: Busybox has a fr
> > David, does Oxygen have any reason it would be different from other
> > LRPs, or should somebody give this guy the standard answer?
>
> I'm not sure what the standard answer would be.
>
> However, the use of the ram disks is hardcoded in linuxrc, and
> /etc/fstab; the kernel is probably the bi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> David, does Oxygen have any reason it would be different from other
> LRPs, or should somebody give this guy the standard answer?
I'm not sure what the standard answer would be.
However, the use of the ram disks is hardcoded in linuxrc, and
/etc/fstab; the kernel is p
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:23:32AM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled:
> Also, this message was posted to leaf-user. Does anyone have an answer?
> http://www.mail-archive.com\leaf-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg1.html
You used the wrong slash in that URL; correct URL is
http://www.mail-archive.com/
Mike Noyes, 2001-03-28 15:29 -0800
>Mike Noyes, 2001-03-27 11:16 -0800
>>Mike Noyes, 2001-03-26 06:26 -0800
>>>Everyone,
>>>Our lists are now being archived at the Mail-Archive in addition to
>>>GeoCrawler. Rick and I will attempt to recreate the older messages in
>>>our new list archives.
>>
>>
Mike Noyes, 2001-03-27 11:16 -0800
>Mike Noyes, 2001-03-26 06:26 -0800
>>Everyone,
>>Our lists are now being archived at the Mail-Archive in addition to
>>GeoCrawler. Rick and I will attempt to recreate the older messages in our
>>new list archives.
>
>Everyone,
>Three of our lists are now archi
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 11:16:14AM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled:
> Rick did most of the work on recreating our old messages in the archive.
Bah! I just ran a 'bounce.pl' that mail-archive.com linked to,
using their instructions. Mike dug up all the messages (he's a
more organized pack-rat than I
Mike Noyes, 2001-03-26 06:26 -0800
>Everyone,
>Our lists are now being archived at the Mail-Archive in addition to
>GeoCrawler. Rick and I will attempt to recreate the older messages in our
>new list archives.
Everyone,
Three of our lists are now archived at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/index.p
Everyone,
Our lists are now being archived at the Mail-Archive in addition to
GeoCrawler. Rick and I will attempt to recreate the older messages in our
new list archives.
leaf-devel
http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/
http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/723
Mike Noyes, 2001-03-25 10:14 -0800
Everyone,
>I just subscribed all of our lists to this service. Rick and I are looking
>into the possibility of adding prior messages into the new archive.
Test mail-archive.com leaf-devel archive.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
Everyone,
It's come to my attention that we should have a backup to the GeoCrawler
archive for our lists. I found the following possible solution. What do you
think?
The Mail Archive
http://www.mail-archive.com/
http://www.mail-archive.com/faq.html
P.S. This may be a good solution for the linu
Mike Noyes, 2001-03-25 08:52 -0800
>The Mail Archive
>http://www.mail-archive.com/
>http://www.mail-archive.com/faq.html
Everyone,
I just subscribed all of our lists to this service. Rick and I are looking
into the possibility of adding prior messages into the new archive.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL
16 matches
Mail list logo
