Re: [Leaf-devel] SF changes TOS

2002-02-14 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> > Um...aprox SQRT(2)/2 > > No, no, I didn't mean rms mirrors :) Not RMS mirrors, just a "shoot from the hip" estimate of how much of our SF content is actually archived off-site. I figure it's some irrational number between 1/2 and 1, hence the above. :) > > > 5) How long does it take to b

Re: [Leaf-devel] SF changes TOS

2002-02-13 Thread Matt Schalit
Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > > 3) Where is the master offsite backup of LEAF material kept? > > I have backups of my site, and the ?defunct? c0wz site. I've been meaning > to setup some scripts to grab the SF site content (stored in mySQL) > periodically, but have yet to do anything on thi

Re: [Leaf-devel] SF changes TOS

2002-02-13 Thread Mike Noyes
At 2002-02-13 15:29 -0800, Matt Schalit wrote: >Mike you are amazing. And it's like you get better at this, all the >time. I said it before, but I'm sure your Dad is proud of you. >You rock man. You just rock :) Matt, Thanks for the very kind words. :-) >About that agreement, > > 1) It look

Re: [Leaf-devel] SF changes TOS

2002-02-13 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> 3) Where is the master offsite backup of LEAF material kept? I have backups of my site, and the ?defunct? c0wz site. I've been meaning to setup some scripts to grab the SF site content (stored in mySQL) periodically, but have yet to do anything on this front. AFAIK, there is *NO* full site

Re: [Leaf-devel] SF changes TOS

2002-02-13 Thread Matt Schalit
Mike Noyes wrote: > > Everyone, > SourceForge is changing their Terms of Service on March 1st. Please read > the new TOS. > https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9269&group_id=1 > > Changes that I noticed: > 1) Notification of TOS changes went from 15 days to effective immediate

Re: [Leaf-devel] SF changes TOS

2002-02-13 Thread guitarlynn
Re:not such a big deal (Score:2) by wendy on Wednesday February 13, @04:34PM (#3002999) (User #42400 Info | http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html) They're choosing to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provision for ISPs (DMCA section 512, not the anticircumvention rules). 512(c) imm

RE: [Leaf-devel] SF changes TOS

2002-02-13 Thread Mike Noyes
Everyone, Slashdot is running a story on SF's new TOS. http://slashdot.org/developers/02/02/13/188234.shtml?tid=150 -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000&page_id=4 __

RE: [Leaf-devel] SF changes TOS

2002-02-13 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 04:36 PM 2/13/02 -, Luis.F.Correia wrote: >Can you explain me in laymen terms what DCMA stands for? >I know it means Digital Copyright Millenium Act but what is this exactly? DMCA, not DCMA. = Digital Millennium Copyright Act. It is a US law that grants certain rights to copyright holders

RE: [Leaf-devel] SF changes TOS

2002-02-13 Thread Luis.F.Correia
, February 13, 2002 4:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Leaf-devel] SF changes TOS Everyone, SourceForge is changing their Terms of Service on March 1st. Please read the new TOS. https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9269&group_id=1 Changes that I noticed: 1) Notification of

[Leaf-devel] SF changes TOS

2002-02-13 Thread Mike Noyes
Everyone, SourceForge is changing their Terms of Service on March 1st. Please read the new TOS. https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9269&group_id=1 Changes that I noticed: 1) Notification of TOS changes went from 15 days to effective immediately upon posting of the modifi