Paul Gear wrote:
Tom has finally admitted what some of us have thought all along. The
day had to come. If you get to the point where you're not happy with
your life, something has to give. And since none of us owe you
anything, i think you've made the right choice, Tom. Best of luck and
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 08:25, Tom Eastep wrote:
Paul Gear wrote:
As for the mechanics of shorewall.net going away: we have a functional
sourceforge.net project page and web site for shorewall. If Tom is
willing, perhaps he could add some of us on the devel list as project
admins on his
Mike Noyes wrote:
If you need help with SF, let me know.
Am i right in remembering
that lists.shorewall.net is hosted elsewhere, Tom?
No, lists.shorewall.net is hosted here in my home. It's the same box as
http://shorewall.net which is the system that all of the mirrors
(including
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 09:22, Tom Eastep wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
I don't mind continuing to
host the mailing lists here for a while until mailing lists can be
reestablished at SF (they were there once upon a time).
The SF staff will even import your pipermail archive, so the content
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 09:22, Tom Eastep wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
The SF staff will even import your pipermail archive, so the content
isn't lost. SF will upgrade Mailman shortly too, so the list settings
shouldn't need much tweaking.
Tom,
Correction: MBOX import is supported. No pipermail
Mike Noyes wrote:
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 09:22, Tom Eastep wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
I don't mind continuing to
host the mailing lists here for a while until mailing lists can be
reestablished at SF (they were there once upon a time).
The SF staff will even import your pipermail archive, so the
Tom;
Many thanks to you from the Bering(-uclibc) developers as well.
Shorewall made iptables easy and helped a lot to build a secure box.
All the best to you - we will miss you.
Am Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2005 17:25 schrieb Tom Eastep:
Paul Gear wrote:
- We need to look at the big issues
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 10:18, Tom Eastep wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
Have you considered moving CVS? I believe you haven't migrated to SVN,
so CVS tarball import by the SF staff is possible. Maybe tarball the
repository after your last release?
Yes -- that will work fine.
Tom,
SourceForge
