[leaf-devel] git master perf broken?

2016-03-09 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Folks it looks like perf on master is broken or has a missing dependency make DESTDIR=/home/mega/leaf/devel/bering-6/build/i486-unknown-linux-uclibc/perf/usr -C /home/mega/leaf/devel/bering-6/source/i486-unknown-linux-uclibc/linux/linux/tools/perf install) make[1]: Entering directory

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-08 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew Am 07.03.2016 um 22:46 schrieb Andrew: > Delayed unmounting is mostly for services that have delayed modules > loading (like wpa-supplicant or hostapd) to ensure that all is ok. If you really want to do this right, then you would need to insert control logic that communicates with the

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-07 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew Am 07.03.2016 um 21:46 schrieb Andrew: > 07.03.2016 20:41, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: ... >> >> Another drawback is the time it needs to load modules.sqfs. >> If we choose to that for several packages it will raise startup times >> significantly. > Delayed umount can solve this. Just

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-07 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew Am 07.03.2016 um 21:46 schrieb Andrew: > 07.03.2016 20:41, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: >> Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 20:26:58 schrieb Andrew: >>> Maybe we should just mount storage till hostapd will start? >> Will hostapd really load the modules without changes to the init process? > If it

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-07 Thread Andrew
07.03.2016 20:41, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 20:26:58 schrieb Andrew: >> Maybe we should just mount storage till hostapd will start? > Will hostapd really load the modules without changes to the init process? If it loads modules earlier - it should load them now with

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-07 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP Am 07.03.2016 um 19:41 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 20:26:58 schrieb Andrew: >> Maybe we should just mount storage till hostapd will start? > > Will hostapd really load the modules without changes to the init process? I doubt it. > The later is something I try to

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-07 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Sorry, another response Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 20:26:58 schrieb Andrew: > Maybe we should just mount storage till hostapd will start? And what happens if hostpad isn't loaded at all? kp -- Transform Data into

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-07 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 20:26:58 schrieb Andrew: > Maybe we should just mount storage till hostapd will start? Will hostapd really load the modules without changes to the init process? The later is something I try to avoid,cause it will make us to maintain a different init for hostapd.

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-07 Thread Andrew
Maybe we should just mount storage till hostapd will start? Also, maybe it'll be good to add delayed umount (for ex., 3-5 seconds)? 07.03.2016 19:06, Erich Titl пишет: > Hi Folks > > OK after some twiddling with buildtool.cfg in master I succeeded to > build a 486 version. > > There are a few

Re: [leaf-devel] git master broken?

2016-03-07 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 11:13:47 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > Is master supposed to compile completely? To me it looks broken. > > mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/bering-6$ git branch > * master > new-initrd-6.x > mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/bering-6$ git pull > remote: Counting

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-06 Thread Andrew
06.03.2016 15:48, Erich Titl пишет: > Am 06.03.2016 um 11:05 schrieb Andrew: >> 4.4 config seems to be re-created from scratch; + currently we use i486 >> as base config - so I moved all changes from i486 cdiff to base config. > That is quite a bit puzzling that the 486 config should be common to

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-05 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew Am 05.03.2016 um 20:30 schrieb Andrew: > I cleaned configs (there was a lot of strange things - as I understood, > you just build storage drivers in kernel instead of modules, all other > changes are unnecessary?). There should not be any other changes in config, if they are I would

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-05 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew Am 05.03.2016 um 11:54 schrieb Andrew: > Hi. > > I'll try to look on it at this weekend. I believe I made some progress mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/bering-6$ git status On branch new-initrd-6.x Your branch and 'origin/new-initrd-6.x' have diverged, and have 101 and 17 different

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-05 Thread Andrew
Hi. I'll try to look on it at this weekend. 05.03.2016 12:51, Erich Titl пишет: > Am 05.03.2016 um 00:57 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: >> Hi Erich; >> ... >> >> They are not forgotten, they are still used for armv6 toolchain. >> We need to update the raspberry kernel (armv6) to 4.4, until then both

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-05 Thread Erich Titl
Am 05.03.2016 um 00:57 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Hi Erich; > ... > > They are not forgotten, they are still used for armv6 toolchain. > We need to update the raspberry kernel (armv6) to 4.4, until then both kernel > versions configs are needed to keep the kernel for raspberry pi at 4.1, which

Re: [leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-04 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Hi Erich; Am Freitag, 4. März 2016, 22:50:09 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > I am trying to rebase new-initrd to master and failing miserably due to > weird (for me) conflicts. In order to make progress I would like to > suggest to clean up master in a way to be at least consistent with the >

[leaf-devel] git master

2016-03-04 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Folks I am trying to rebase new-initrd to master and failing miserably due to weird (for me) conflicts. In order to make progress I would like to suggest to clean up master in a way to be at least consistent with the actual kernel release, e.g. the person responsable for the introduction of