-devel] Re: Webbased configuration
Better sense tells me I should probably keep quiet, but ...
Nah...speak up. We won't even flame you here!
Back when this discussion came up previously (Dec 2001/Jan 2002?) I
was able
On Sunday 01 September 2002 09:58, Nathan Angelacos wrote:
Hey Lynn, thanks for your comments.
I guess we are approaching this from slightly different starting
assumptions. My assumption is that the webbased configuration engine
is just a pretty face on lrcfg.
The model I'm thinking of is
