some remarks about using forth:
- certainly forth is missing all that nice pattern matching
like awk or perl, all this has to be coded.
Well, C is missing these as well, until you load a massive standard
library :)
- I assume that even arrays are not available in forth
Not as part of the
Charles Steinkuehler schrieb:
some remarks about using forth:
- certainly forth is missing all that nice pattern matching
like awk or perl, all this has to be coded.
Well, C is missing these as well, until you load a massive standard
library :)
- I assume that even arrays are
Readability is a question of coding style. In any language you can
write code that is not easy to understand.
snip
but the latter is more easily to understand.
It is also a question of experience with the language.
My boss is a experienced C programmer on DOS and embedded systems.
But
Mike Noyes schrieb:
Manfred,
Is your perl4 package different than the one already in our repository?
Yes
- it is compiled with gcc 2.95.3. If the tales about this compiler
version are true, it should gain some speed.
- it is linked static against libdb
- it does not contain libm, libm.lrp
Everyone,
I propose the creation of a config tree in our CVS src tree. All of the
components necessary for this project can be placed there, and write
access granted to team members. The structure of the config tree is left
to the team members discretion.
Example:
leaf/src/config +
Hi,
some remarks about using forth:
- certainly forth is missing all that nice pattern matching
like awk or perl, all this has to be coded.
- I assume that even arrays are not available in forth
- because forth uses very unusual semantics (reverse
polish notation) it is not easy to
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 13:08, Erich Titl wrote:
you seem to be knowledgeable about the copyright stuff. I am about to paint
an entry page for the config stuff and would like to use the LEAF logo for
it. Is there a problem?
Erich,
Since I created it there is no problem. It can be used for
On Sunday 01 September 2002 15:08, Erich Titl wrote:
Mike
you seem to be knowledgeable about the copyright stuff. I am about to
paint an entry page for the config stuff and would like to use the
LEAF logo for it. Is there a problem?
Erich,
Would you mind getting with Richard Amerman and
]]
Sent: Sun 9/1/2002 10:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Webbased configuration
On Sunday 01 September 2002 15:08, Erich Titl wrote:
Mike
you seem to be knowledgeable about the copyright
Hello Lynn, Charles , List
On Saturday 31 August 2002 14:21, Eric Wolzak wrote:
Hello all,
I agree with Erich that it would be wise to get an architecture
before thinking about the implementation.
IMHO it should be :
-easy to configure.
-flexible , so adding new packages is
Well put!
I know that I have not been vocal in the past month, I have been overloaded with a
rush project at work, and my Wife has taken to Zope, so between these, I have had
little time for LEAF. This does not mean that I am less interested. :-)
Your post is right on track. One
Hi Eric, Lynn, Charles
Asking for permission to come aboard.
Dive right in! You'll either sink or swim.
Please don't swim within 30 minutes of eating.
Remember your life-preserver.
Go with the flow, swim against the current, or maybe just try treading
water...your preference.
Please keep
12 matches
Mail list logo
