On 03.10.2016 11:45, kp kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2016, 10:41:05 schrieb Andrew:
>> On 02.10.2016 23:37, Erich Titl wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew
>>>
>>> Am 02.10.2016 um 19:58 schrieb Andrew:
On 02.10.2016 20:45, Erich Titl wrote
>>> :...
>>> :
> We need to find out if this
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2016, 10:41:05 schrieb Andrew:
> On 02.10.2016 23:37, Erich Titl wrote:
> > Hi Andrew
> >
> > Am 02.10.2016 um 19:58 schrieb Andrew:
> >> On 02.10.2016 20:45, Erich Titl wrote
> >>
> > :...
> > :
> >>> We need to find out if this is an issue for the majority of our users.
>
On 02.10.2016 23:37, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> Am 02.10.2016 um 19:58 schrieb Andrew:
>> On 02.10.2016 20:45, Erich Titl wrote
> :...
>>> We need to find out if this is an issue for the majority of our users.
>>> most of the drivers will probably just work as they work in standad
>>>
Hi Andrew
Am 02.10.2016 um 19:58 schrieb Andrew:
> On 02.10.2016 20:45, Erich Titl wrote
:...
>> We need to find out if this is an issue for the majority of our users.
>> most of the drivers will probably just work as they work in standad
>> distros.
> This is issue for everybody who uses intel
Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016, 19:48:21 schrieb Andrew:
> On 02.10.2016 19:36, kp kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016, 19:29:37 schrieb Andrew:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> Built-in drivers have much less parameters. For ex., interrupt
> >> throttling, etc.
> >
> > Is this also
Hi.
Built-in drivers have much less parameters. For ex., interrupt
throttling, etc.
On 02.10.2016 19:25, kp kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I've had some spare time and was looking at what is ahead .
>
> I've updated for testing uclibc-ng to 1.0.18 (which seems about 100 kb
> smaller) and kernel
