Re: [leaf-devel] intel network drivers

2016-10-02 Thread Andrew
Hi. Built-in drivers have much less parameters. For ex., interrupt throttling, etc. On 02.10.2016 19:25, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: > Hi; > > I've had some spare time and was looking at what is ahead . > > I've updated for testing uclibc-ng to 1.0.18 (which seems about 100 kb > smaller) and kernel

[leaf-devel] intel network drivers

2016-10-02 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Hi; I've had some spare time and was looking at what is ahead . I've updated for testing uclibc-ng to 1.0.18 (which seems about 100 kb smaller) and kernel 4.7.6 (which seems about 100 kb larger). A few packages are failing to compile - notably ipt-netflow (looking into the src repository it

Re: [leaf-devel] intel network drivers

2016-10-02 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016, 19:48:21 schrieb Andrew: > On 02.10.2016 19:36, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: > > Hi; > > > > Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016, 19:29:37 schrieb Andrew: > >> Hi. > >> > >> Built-in drivers have much less parameters. For ex., interrupt > >> throttling, etc. > > > > Is this also

Re: [leaf-devel] intel network drivers

2016-10-02 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew Am 02.10.2016 um 19:58 schrieb Andrew: > On 02.10.2016 20:45, Erich Titl wrote :... >> We need to find out if this is an issue for the majority of our users. >> most of the drivers will probably just work as they work in standad >> distros. > This is issue for everybody who uses intel