Patrick
At 13:34 23.09.2004 +0200, Patrick Benson wrote:
Erich Titl wrote:
Hi everybody
Networks 83.0.0.0 and 84.0.0.0 have been assigned to RIPE last year. In my version
(1.4.8) of shorewall these networks are still blocked by the rfc1918 rules. It it
probably worthwhile to remove
Chad,
What is the status of leaf-tools?
Nathan,
What is the status of webconf?
Everyone,
Has anyone looked at how Devil-Linux and/or Sentry Firewall handle
configuration?
http://www.devil-linux.org/
http://www.sentryfirewall.com/
--
Mike Noyes mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net
Everyone,
What is the status of Dash adoption?
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/dash
http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/dash/
--
Mike Noyes mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm,
On Friday 24 September 2004 12:53 pm, Mike Noyes wrote:
What is the status of webconf?
The current version in cvs provides a web version of lrcfg and the backup
script. It works for me, but hasn't been tested much.
I've received a number of good suggestions from the uClibc-Bering crew, and as
On Friday 24 September 2004 12:06 pm, Mike Noyes wrote:
Everyone,
What is the status of Dash adoption?
I believe that Uclibc is now using dash.
Dash is not an option with Glibc-2.0.x, I checked a long time ago.
--
~Lynn Avants
Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall Developer
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 21:35, Lynn Avants wrote:
On Friday 24 September 2004 12:06 pm, Mike Noyes wrote:
What is the status of Dash adoption?
I believe that Uclibc is now using dash.
Dash is not an option with Glibc-2.0.x, I checked a long time ago.
Lynn,
Is it a failure on compile? If so,
