Paul Gear wrote:
Tom has finally admitted what some of us have thought all along. The
day had to come. If you get to the point where you're not happy with
your life, something has to give. And since none of us owe you
anything, i think you've made the right choice, Tom. Best of luck and
Tom,
Your support had been so valuable as the shorewall itself.
It has been a pleasure reading your replies on this channel.
Shorewall has brought so much credibility to many net admins
(and the would be net admins:-))from the Top Management of their organizations.
And with shorewall
All,
I am prepared to host the website/domain, is there a group of people that
are willing to be active in the ongoing support/development of shorewall?
Regards,
T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Eastep
Sent: Wednesday, 18
Your passion shone through.
Thank you.
Tom Eastep wrote:
It is with regret that I announce that Shorewall development and support is
officially ended.
Sean's post has finally driven it home to me that in the long term, trying
to support a project like Shorewall is impossible for a person
Tom Eastep wrote:
It is with regret that I announce that Shorewall development and support is
officially ended.
Tom:
Thanks for everything you've done. And stay well.
Regards,
Micha
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space
It is with regret that I announce that Shorewall development and support is
officially ended.
Sean's post has finally driven it home to me that in the long term, trying
to support a project like Shorewall is impossible for a person of my
personality and age.
Sean -- please believe that this
Tom Eastep wrote:
It is with regret that I announce that Shorewall development and support is
officially ended.
Sean's post has finally driven it home to me that in the long term, trying
to support a project like Shorewall is impossible for a person of my
personality and age.
...
Unlike
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 08:25, Tom Eastep wrote:
Paul Gear wrote:
As for the mechanics of shorewall.net going away: we have a functional
sourceforge.net project page and web site for shorewall. If Tom is
willing, perhaps he could add some of us on the devel list as project
admins on his
Mike Noyes wrote:
If you need help with SF, let me know.
Am i right in remembering
that lists.shorewall.net is hosted elsewhere, Tom?
No, lists.shorewall.net is hosted here in my home. It's the same box as
http://shorewall.net which is the system that all of the mirrors
(including
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 09:22, Tom Eastep wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
I don't mind continuing to
host the mailing lists here for a while until mailing lists can be
reestablished at SF (they were there once upon a time).
The SF staff will even import your pipermail archive, so the content
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 09:22, Tom Eastep wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
The SF staff will even import your pipermail archive, so the content
isn't lost. SF will upgrade Mailman shortly too, so the list settings
shouldn't need much tweaking.
Tom,
Correction: MBOX import is supported. No pipermail
Tom:
My very best wishes for a happy and healthy future for you. And
my congrats and appreciation for what you achieved with Shorewall;
it remains an excellent implementation.
cheers,
Scott
On May 17, 2005, at 8:17 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
It is with regret that I announce that Shorewall
Mike Noyes wrote:
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 09:22, Tom Eastep wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
I don't mind continuing to
host the mailing lists here for a while until mailing lists can be
reestablished at SF (they were there once upon a time).
The SF staff will even import your pipermail archive, so the
Paul Traina wrote:
[Tom, just cc'ing you if you want to chime in about the
stability/appropriateness of 2.3]
So as you guys know, I made the shorewall packages for BU based on the
stable 2.2 branch of shorewall. If shorewall is moved from
shorewall.net to sourceforge and taken over by
Tom;
Many thanks to you from the Bering(-uclibc) developers as well.
Shorewall made iptables easy and helped a lot to build a secure box.
All the best to you - we will miss you.
Am Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2005 17:25 schrieb Tom Eastep:
Paul Gear wrote:
- We need to look at the big issues
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Eastep wrote:
| It is with regret that I announce that Shorewall development and support is
| officially ended.
Tom,
First, many thanks for creating the firewall that I now use to replace the
customized scripts from my earlier LRP/LEAF releases. I
It is with regret that I announce that Shorewall development and support
is
officially ended.
Hi Tom,
All I can say is THANK YOU very much for all the hard work you have put
into Shorewall and it's great documentation and the best support I have
seen in my life. I hope you will get your life
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 10:18, Tom Eastep wrote:
Mike Noyes wrote:
Have you considered moving CVS? I believe you haven't migrated to SVN,
so CVS tarball import by the SF staff is possible. Maybe tarball the
repository after your last release?
Yes -- that will work fine.
Tom,
SourceForge
Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
2005/5/18, Tom Eastep [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- We need to look at the big issues and make sure we've got a good
handle on them. For me, these include (in rough order of priority from
my perspective):
* Multiple ISPs load balancing
* Features to enable building a
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 11:57, Tom Eastep wrote:
Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
Possibly Mike Noyes can help you with coming up with a new arrangement;
he has offered to help with things at the Sourceforge end. I'm uncertain
how to set up a publishing scheme based at Sourceforge that can keep the
Mike Noyes wrote:
Do you pull or push with rsync? SF doesn't offer public rsync hosting.
Only project members with shell access can rsync to/from the shell.
Currently, all of the mirrors pull from rsync.shorewall.net.
I use a script on SF to xslt docbook xml to html. It's not great, but it
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 12:28, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
2005/5/18, Tom Eastep [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've attached the simple scripts that I use to publish to Sourceforge
and to my own server (shorewall.net AKA lists.shorewall.net AKA
cvs.shorewall.net AKA rsync.shorewall.net).
Paul Gear wrote:
Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
...
My ideas are the following:
1. Declare Shorewall alive but feature frozen,only bug fixes, until
we can organize and get the needed coders,especially some good bash
coders and an iptables geek (¿anyone?)
2.I can take care of a mirror and enrole me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Noyes wrote:
| On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 12:28, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
| 2005/5/18, Tom Eastep [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| I've attached the simple scripts that I use to publish to Sourceforge
| and to my own server (shorewall.net AKA
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 10:17 pm, Tom Eastep wrote:
It is with regret that I announce that Shorewall development and support is
officially ended.
Tom,
The enormous amount of time and energy you have put in to develop,
promote, and support Shorewall has been appreciated more than you
will likely
25 matches
Mail list logo
